Microsoft Announces Yet Another DRM Nobody Really Wants
from the snorrrrre dept
Despite Bill Gates' supposed lack of fondness for DRM, Microsoft continues to build copy-protection technology that might mollify content providers, but doesn't really do much for end users. A few years ago, it released its PlaysForSure system, which it licensed to a number of device manufacturers and was supposed to ensure that compatible content could be played across a bunch of devices. Like most DRM schemes, it was broken when its subscription features were cracked, and Microsoft eventually moved away from it, choosing not even to support it in its Zune media device. But the company has now announced a new DRM system aimed at mobile phones to annoy users and restrict what they can do with legitimately purchased content. Called PlayReady (they're getting creative), the platform-agnostic technology supports the use of "domains," which will supposedly allow users to copy content to multiple registered devices they own -- but, of course, it will be limited by who sold them the content and who controls it. The company notes that so far, PlayReady is just a "foundation technology," but hopes to roll it out in a product sometime in the first half of the year, and it's already garnered the support of several mobile operators for it. Of course, while the company says that it will allow users to put content on multiple devices, it will be rather difficult to get many old devices they already own to support this new flavor of DRM, rather undermining that claim.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Microsoft is gay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft is gay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This wont work either...
Since I don't believe that a company should have the rights of an individual, I wont say whether or not the "company" can be gay.
Back on topic, This DRM scheme (or should I say schema?) will be a miserable failure AND THATS A GOOD THING.
We need more DRM strategies to become horrid miserable failures in the eyes of the consumer so they will stop "voting for drm with their dollars". Just be happy you are enlightened enough to not be the example for others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This wont work either...
And I don't believe the person that called MS the Corp gay, meant that MS is homosexual. Just a little kid calling things he doesn't like "Gay."
As for DRM, it doesn't and will never stop REAL piracy, and it was never meant to. It is a means of control over the paying public by the content fascists.
Before DRM's codification into the law with the DMCA, the content industries had to sue you and win, if they disagreed with your interpretation of "fair use." Now with the DMCA and DRM, the legal burden has been shifted to the consumer. If you don't agree with DRM locking you out of your ability to "fairly use" the content you purchased, you now have to sue them, and since "fair use" is technically a defense to copyright infringement, a court probably is gonna side with the content fascists, since you wouldn't be defending yourself, but suing to break the content fascists' DRM lock out.
There has yet to be a DRM system that isn't a total piece of useless crap, yet the sheeple keep buying crap with it. You don't ever need to fool all the sheeple all the time, just fooling enough of them to make a profit is quite sufficient.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This wont work either...
...sorry to ruin your day with that mental image
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This wont work either...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
money money money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It will be hacked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bumbling old fool is gay
This is just another MS DRM will be cracked the second it hits a consumer electronic. Also, following their astonishing success of de-throning the iPod, their no "iPhone killer" phone will meet similar success after being strapped with Zune like flexibility and PlayReady content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why
but no they just keep on finding ways to force people into using their crap software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM is dumber than a Bush family reunion. Why do they persist? Instead of wasting millions of dollars worth of entertainment for hackers and crackers, why not find ways of making your product cheaper? I'm sure economically, higher sales, not fewer, makes more sense? Maybe I'm missing something??? Maybe I'm just gay.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow
"Calling someone that you don't like 'Gay' just because you can't come up with anything more original, is just plain sad. Quit being such a faggot and come up with something worth reading...."
You just did what you said not to do!!! (gay and faggot are both used as derogatory terms for homosexuals.) You freaking frenchman! oh wait... I think frenchmen are homosexuals...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
English, a living language...
Not long after the word gay came to mean homosexual. This wasn't a particularly natural progression of the English language, the homosexual community wanted a more positive label for themselves if I recall correctly, and took the word by force.
There are no doubt a number of homosexual employees in Microsoft but I don't think that makes the company gay as a whole. I'm fairly sure that Bill Gates, Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer are not gay.
Today it seems the meaning of the word has changed, or is at least in the process of changing, again. Gay now means sad and pathetic; almost the exact opposite of the meaning it had a little over thirty years ago.
By that meaning Microsoft is still not gay, but many of their products and all of their various incompatable DRM schemes most certainly are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny
Hear that sound? It's sarcasm going right over your head.
Anyway, I still think it is a bit early to call all DRM inherently crackable. The problem is that every DRM system created so far has been designed by idiots. DVDs, Itunes, WMVs; all had encryption systems that were just plain weak. AACS is a better system, and while some keys have been cracked, they designed the system with such an eventuality in mind. We shell see if it can handle the amount of attacks being thrown at it or not.
If it is cracked, the entertainment/computer industry will figure out how and make a new system. And with MS and Intel locking down entire computer systems, they might eventually succeed.
As for Vista, I think MS is out of ideas. MS has always been way ahead of the curve in terms of the combination of usability and technical expertise (And frankly, Apple fanboys, I don't want to hear your rebuttal). With Vista it seems they have nothing more to add to the party, and it will be interesting if Linux can finally catch up. I refuse to install Vista for now, because of the DRM (and the uselessness, and the incompatibility, and other reasons), and am switching more to Linux. But I am a geek and I still find Linux maddening difficult. If Linux can capture the newbie non-geek interest, it does have a lot of advantages that might finally put them ahead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey, all you homos!
1. All DRM systems rely on symmetric encryption to secure the content. The key must be symmetric because the decryption has to happen over a lot of data in real-time.
2. So, Joe User, in order to play back his DRM content, must have access to this secret key. It may be "hidden" from him, but it is on his system, somewhere.
3. Once Joe Hacker locates the secret key that has to be on the system in order for DRM to work, then the gig is up (at least for that particular piece of content).
So, DRM is weak, and creating a brain-dead hack of it is always a trivial exercise. The only question is whether or not people see the content as being worth all the trouble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And as for the whole gay thing, in all honesty 'gay' on the internet translates to 'lame' and has nothing to do with homosexuals. Seeing as they stole the word and made it mean something else there isnt anything wrong with this, if they take offense then they just really want to be the victim in an 'homophobe' lawsuit so they can either get money or be really proud gay heroes that stood up for their right to piddle whomever they want.
More power to them, but sometimes people need to just lighten the hell up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Irony
[ link to this | view in chronology ]