Norway Looking To Force ISPs To Censor The Internet
from the great-firewall-moves-north dept
There aren't many details here, but it sounds like Norway is thinking about putting in place an internet censorship plan that's similar to what's in China. ISPs would be responsible for blocking various sites that the government didn't like -- including foreign gambling sites (government monopoly on gambling would be protected), any sites that offer unauthorized downloads, sites that are seen as "desecrating the Flag or Coat of Arms of a foreign nation," sites "promoting hatred towards public authorities, racism and hate speech" and "Sites offering pornography that may cause offence." While it sounds like this is still a long way away from becoming law, there are obviously a ton of problems with this. Beyond the first point, which is clearly just to preserve a lucrative government monopoly, the rest are pretty subjective and open to wide interpretation. Promoting hatred towards public authorities could be seen as just about any political blog. Hell, perhaps this post could be seen as qualifying to be blocked. Also, trying to ban pornography sites is impossible, because there is no definition of pornography that covers everything. There are a ton of sites out there that "may offend" some people -- but won't offend most people. It's not clear what good such a proposal would actually do -- but it's pretty clear that it would probably piss off a lot of perfectly reasonable Norwegian residents who want the freedom to use the internet as they please. Update: In the comments, it's pointed out that this proposal is not supported by the majority, and probably won't go anywhere.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Not too worried.
By Norwegian Law, the minority proposal has to be considered by the DOJ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for "offensive pornography", as far as I know that's what the current law on pornography bans--and last year, the supreme court decided that the state couldn't decide what would cause offence. Thus hardcore porn became legal, and it's no longer necessary for people to set their decoders to Swedish to circumvent the infamous black bars covering naughty bits. :-P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good
While agree that most media sources might have blown this out of proportion I do think it was worth mentioning. Acting like an issue isn't there does not make it go away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Justice flushtice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No chance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]