Wireless Speaker Patent Holder Sues Slingbox Over Place Shifting

from the not-quite-what-the-patent-system-intended dept

Fri, Feb 16th 2007 10:52am — Mike Masnick

One of the problems with the big patent awards that have been given out lately is that patent holders will look for just about anything that might possibly maybe-if-you-squinted be considered to infringe on a patent they hold. Witness the latest case (of course, filed in the Easter Texas court that patent holders flock to), where the guy who holds a patent on wireless speakers is suing place shifting device maker, Sling Media. Sling Media's Slingbox is a very useful little device that hooks up to your TV and lets you access the content on your TV (or DVR) via any internet connection. If that seems a lot more advanced than wireless speakers, you'd be correct. It certainly sounds like the guy is claiming that his patent on wireless speakers basically applies to place shifting any content -- which is a huge stretch. Of course, with the way some courts have been handing out huge prizes to patent holders, no wonder he thinks it's worth a shot.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

10 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Chris, 16 Feb 2007 @ 11:53am

What's next?
I wonder if he's given any thought to those wonderful little FM modulator / transmitter's for iPod, Sirius, XM, etc....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chris, 16 Feb 2007 @ 11:55am

or...
... or to take things to even more of an extreme, remote controls. Isn't that effectively place-shifting your finger to the buttons on the TV / VCR / PVR / DVD / Sat / etc? :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Feb 2007 @ 11:56am

thats funny very soon it would be wirless headsets too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The infamous Joe, 16 Feb 2007 @ 12:09pm

Math
That last line pretty much sums up what is wrong with patent legal cases.

I don't blame the bottomfeeders-- they are just following their nature of bottomfeeding, I blame the people who make it "worth a shot" for them to do so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sanguine Dream, 16 Feb 2007 @ 1:21pm

Good point Joe
There are way too many bottomfeeders to try to take them all out. On the other hand there aren't as many people that make it "worth a shot", which is why patent holders flock to certain friendly courts.

So if I understand this right place shifting is simply moving content from one device to another? If so then internet itself is violating this guy's patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DV Henkel-Wallace, 16 Feb 2007 @ 1:45pm

Prior art
My understanding is that this also counts as "place shifting."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dosquatch, 16 Feb 2007 @ 5:21pm
  
  Re: Prior art
  Thank you for that. I was going to post pretty much exactly the same point - radio and television are prior art.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous of Course, 16 Feb 2007 @ 3:12pm

I wouldn't call it innovative
The patent is 6,212,282 and it begins with the
premise that wireless speakers/hadphones are
of limited range at 900Mhz and cites some prior
art.

So he does the A/D and D/A thing and also uses
the link for control of the source device.

It's pretty obvious to anyone familiar with FCC
part 15 that for increased range you have to
move to spread spectrum and run more power,
like cordless telephones have already done /and
some other audio devices as well./

Slingbox is not a speaker, this guy is grasping at straws.
His patent is pretty shakey as well if prior art matters
a jot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gregory, 15 Mar 2013 @ 6:27am

Wow i wonder how that court case went with this case. You know, some people think they are entitled to some things. The wireless speaker system is an ingenious idea and I do think other companies should be entitled to have the choice to develop products like these, that is if he wanted to close that option? Wireless speakers today have improved alot, with some you would'nt even know they are wireless because of the quality of sound they produce today. Thanks for informing us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AltavocesBluetooth (profile), 20 Aug 2015 @ 5:51am

We are doing something wrong with the patent system...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]