iTunes Exposes Classical Music Hoax
from the gotcha dept
The classical music world has been thrown into a tizzy by the revelation that the recordings of an acclaimed, dead pianist are actually the work of a hoax. Shortly before her death, the British pianist Joyce Hatto was proclaimed by some to be the "the greatest living pianist that almost no one has heard of" upon the release of her recordings. But according to a sound engineer working on behalf of a classical music magazine, all 100 of her CDs can be attributed to other artists. What's really fascinating about the story is how the hoax was discovered. Apparently a critic of the magazine put one of her CDs into iTunes and found that iTunes identified the recording as belonging to another artist. iTunes is able to identify an album by the comparing the duration of its tracks against a database of known albums. When the critic put in another one of Hatto's CDs, iTunes again attributed it to another pianist. It was only then that the magazine decided to consult experts, who confirmed that the recordings were not original. Of course, Hatto's husband who created a record label solely to distribute his late wife's work claims to have "no idea" why the tracks seem so similar to other people's recordings.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
first post! bam!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: first post! bam!
What the article says is that Ms. Hutto had been taking recordings from other pianists AND PASSING THEM OFF AS HER OWN RECORDINGS.
What you're thinking is, "Hm. So she's recorded Beethoven's Piano Concerto No. 5. Where's the foul?"
The problem is that she has taken, say, Claudio Arrau's recordings, and then slapped her name on them and released them as being her performances.
I can only imagine the fun that the lawyers will have on this one...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hatto
http://www.gramophone.co.uk/newsMainTemplate.asp?storyID=2759&newssectionID=1
Fas cinating how so many people fell for this hoax based apparently (given the revelation that it was a hoax) solely on the apparent obscurantism of Hatto's latter "recordings."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
response to "Wow"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: response to "Wow"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: response to "Wow"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait a minute
So then Hatto's release was a compilation of sorts yet CDDB matched it to the work of a single artist. I know all it is doing is comparing the number of tracks with the duration of the disc, so there are bound to be false positives, but it makes me wonder about the circumstances that set this whole thing in motion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CDDB is not a good test for this...
In this case, however, CDDB let's you know enough that you can then compare the actual data in the tracks to see if they're the same.
To sum up, CDDB doesn't use the actual music itself to generate its ids. It just uses the CD table of contents.
From wikipedia: "Critics charge that the field listings for CDDB are inadequate for the inclusion of proper identification of classical music recordings."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CDDB is not a good test for this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]