Congress Critters Threaten To Pass Laws Forcing Universities To Obey RIAA
from the money-well-spent dept
You may have noticed that the RIAA decided that 2007 was the year that they would try to piss off college students around the country by assuming they were all criminals and making sure that they're even less interested in supporting legal and authorized music options. The RIAA started out with its "pre-settlement" offers, where it hoped that students accused of file sharing would agree to pay up early, without having a chance to even see or respond to the flimsy evidence the RIAA had on them. Following this, the RIAA convinced some grandstanding politicians to threaten universities that didn't do more to stop file sharing, even as various universities wondered why it was their responsibility to spend their time and money dealing with the RIAA's inability to find a new business model.It appears that the money the RIAA is spending on campaign donations is well spent, however. With the universities not falling into line as expected, Congress held hearings where various politicians blasted universities for not taking a more proactive stance and threatening to withhold federal money from universities that don't play by the RIAA's rules. The quotes are stunning for both their ignorance and clear bias from the start. It starts off with Science and Technology Committee Chair Bart Gordon saying that it's not just about royalties: "It clogs campus networks and interferes with the educational and research mission of universities." Whether or not that's true is debatable, but isn't it up to the universities, not Congress, to decide what to do about it?
Then there was Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner claiming that file sharing "[drives] up the cost of education" without offering a shred of evidence that this is true. Even so, there are lots of things that drive up the cost of education (textbooks and good professors for example), and no one's complaining about them. Then, when two university representatives gently tried to note the problems with filtering technology (it doesn't work very well, has many more costs in terms of managing, blocks perfectly legitimate uses and can damage the network) while also daring to point out that this is really a business model issue for the entertainment industry, our wonderful Congressional representatives "accused them of not taking seriously the viability of technological solutions." Who do you think understands the viability of technological solutions better? The chief information officer for the University of Chicago or a bunch of politicians? It seems clear they had no interest in actually hearing about why such technologies have additional costs, and only wanted to make it known that they were going to start withholding money, no matter what the unintended consequences.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
think positive
maybe a positive will come out of this hearing, to wit: the cio's will return home thinking "what a bunch of shills. i'm talking to our lawyers", who in turn will have the guts to advise a firmer policy vis-a-vis the riaa's aggressive pursuit of the universities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overstepping.
It's scary that these men, like Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.), were actually elected into office, when he spouts such nonsense as:
So, if crimes are committed on roads, pull funding on roads, right? Is there a reset button on the government? Oh yeah, the founding fathers wrote one in there for us:
Also, it mildly amusing that Greg Jackson, chief information officer for the University of Chicago, nailed the DRM on the head, when it seems that the RIAA just can't understand it. Mr. Jackon's wonderful quote for your viewing pleasure:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well.....
2. It is not the network owners job to protect someone else's failing business model.
3. It has been said many times before, the RIAA/MPIAA need to have their attitudes adjusted, preferably with a large hammer.
4. If I were a university network admin my response would be a hardy F**K OFF, this is my network! Take your attempts at a money grab and pack sand!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AlCore, DARPA and Congress invented the internet,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: AlCore, DARPA and Congress invented the intern
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ahhhh
They should take up smoking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
List of Peoples
I want to send them nasty-grams about their senility.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of Peoples
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A reality check
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A reality check
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A reality check
The fact that students are using P2P applications is not in it's self a reason for a crack down. The Universities need to have the infrastructure in place to serve their students (since the students are paying for them to exist). If students downloads can cripple a network, the IT staff needs to be fired for not having systems in place to regulate it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where are the Martians when we need them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We need a revolution
We need a revolution- get rid of every damn one them and start over.
I mean, Ted Stevens is in charge of regulating the Internet-- and we all know he's proved that he doesn't even know what the Internet is!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Global Equality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Global Equality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Education Investment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It ain't the musicians
When TLC was huge, they had tunes on all the charts, had about 5 number ones off the same CD, and do you know that at that time there wasn't one of them who was making $35K. And who was making those MILLIONS that were coming in? THE LAWYERS at the heads of the companies. That is just one example, there are literally thousands of others.
This is the industry, which has yet to move forward from a 1950's model, other than screwing the artists even more, scrambling for a way to keep paying their overinflated salaries even if they have to sue THEIR CUSTOMERS to do it. Pretty freaking sad if THAT is what they have for a strategy. And so they have to go and destroy the college system to maintain their graft? Sorry, I wouldn't mind seeing the RIAA go right down the toilet.
Now if you'll pardon me, I have to change for my gig tonight, where if I am lucky, I MIGHT make what Charlie Parker was making in 1952 playing in EXACTLY the same kind of places I am now. Damn, there are times I just HATE this business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]