Developers Keep Cracking Away At Mesh Networks
from the maybe-you-can-hear-me-now dept
Mesh networks have been talked about for many years as a wireless networking technology for the future. The basic idea is that instead of having every individual access point or cell site backhauled to a larger network (like the internet or the PSTN), access points can talk to one another, and traffic can hop from one AP to the next, until it reaches one with a backhaul connection. This sounds great, in theory, since it makes it much easier to deploy wireless networks, but mesh networks haven't proven easy to get going in the real world. Still, researchers continue to push forward, with the latest development coming from a Swedish company that says it's got a way for mobile phones to communicate directly with others up to a kilometer away, bypassing a centralized mobile network. While the direct range is limited, the mesh functionality can expand the coverage area.Assuming the technology actually works well in the real world, it could be a useful way to allow communications in remote areas without mobile networks, while the company behind it says it could also be used to allow for free calls. It doesn't sound as if they have things completely sorted out on the technology front yet, but the bigger problem with getting the technology adopted in the developed world, where traditional mobile networks are common, is that coverage can't be guaranteed. Instead of plunking down a base station (or WiFi access point, etc.) and knowing it will cover a certain area, this sort of mesh network requires that there be a chain of users, each no more than 1km apart, between the two people who wish to communicate. If any part of that chain breaks, the network has to try route around it and hope that there's another way to connect the two parties. This can be a problem, particularly when networks are first launching and there aren't a lot of users around. It's also a hurdle that users in developed nations, where mobile networks are already plentiful -- and relatively cheap -- won't be very willing to overlook.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: mesh networks, wireless
Companies: terranet
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Easy way around that!
Or something to that effect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
meshes are particularly tricky for mobile voice
The first is latency; every time your voice packet has to be forwarded through another intermediary node it experiences a bit more delay, the total amount of which will change as the routing topology does.
The second is power consumption; Your cell phone battery may be sufficient for 100's of hours of standby and 10's of hours of your own talking, but what happens when you're also forwarding packets for dozens of other phone users?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Swedish company develops mobile mesh networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For example, rather than allowing the technology to make a lot of hops wireless providers could use it to reduce the load on their networks by setting phones to act more like walkie-talkies on a call only while both ends are within range of each other and in a way that is transparent to the users, so switchover and switchback if needed happen automatically. If you've ever had a situation where you tried to make a call and got a 'network busy' message this could help.
It could also be useful on the outlying areas of a network, to extend coverage somewhat into areas with weaker signal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Already Implemented
I've held one of these laptops, and was told that the 802.11s was fully functional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Limited application makes sense
Mesh could be used to hop once when RF conditions to the base station fail.
I agree with the above poster with issues regarding power and there is also the security. "oh so my call is going through someone else's" phone. Not sure how that will go over.
The status of the network is also important. In europe where cells are small but use is high (per cell) you might see a different model than say in somewhere in the middle of iowa where the cell is huge and use is low.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]