NTP's Back, And It's Brought More Lawsuits

from the oh-you-again? dept

Tue, Sep 11th 2007 4:57pm — Carlo Longino

Everybody's favorite patent troll, NTP, is back. It, of course, was the company that managed to wring $612.5 million out of RIM, maker of the BlackBerry, for patent infringement -- despite the patents in question being on their way to being rejected by the USPTO after a bunch of prior art came to light. NTP has now sued AT&T, Verizon and Sprint, as well as T-Mobile, for infringing on the same patents. RIM's settlement with NTP was widely believed to protect its carrier customers from infringement suits, but it's likely such protection extended only to their use of RIM products, not other mobile email systems. It's not too surprising that NTP sued, since it's a patent troll and that's what they do, though it's slightly curious since the suits were filed in the same Virginia court, with the same judge, as its previous cases. This includes its earlier suit against Palm, which the judge put on hold until after the validity of NTP's patents is finally assessed. It's likely the same thing will happen here, but NTP probably doesn't care too much -- it's just looking for more leverage to wring undeserved settlements and licensing deals out of anybody it can.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: patents
Companies: at&t, ntp, palm, rim, sprint, t-mobile, verizon

9 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

ehrichweiss, 11 Sep 2007 @ 5:45pm

been said before...
it's been said before: wireless + common internet service = "revolutionary, patent(troll)able idea"

Cue angrydude whining and moaning in
5
4
3
2....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Avatar28, 11 Sep 2007 @ 6:59pm

I wonder if they considered that AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint have the money and lawyers to completely bury them. Considering the USTPO's direction on those patents, I hope they decide to stand up and fight instead of just rolling over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Cow, 11 Sep 2007 @ 7:12pm

CompTIA Net+
Network Time Protocol?

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/N/NTP.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sanguine Dream, 11 Sep 2007 @ 7:40pm

So...
what exactly does NTP do? All searches point to them being a patent holding company. Does this mean that they are like those "companies" from the early dotcom days that were nothing but a group of people that would patent something and then look for people infringing on it even though they are not bringing that patent to market?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Richard Ahlquist (profile), 12 Sep 2007 @ 5:40am

As the guys in the Guiness commercials would say..
....Brilliant!

Get a small nibble from a small company and then take on the death star errr I mean AT&T. I am afraid they have bitten off more than they can chew.

Question is, will the big bells be willing to try to get the patent thrown out using the obviousness ruling that was recently made and suffer the consequences themselves? Hmmmmm......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Vincent Clement, 12 Sep 2007 @ 6:11am
  
  Re: As the guys in the Guiness commercials would s
  Seeing as some of the Bells are suing Vonzage for patent infringement, I think the Bells will settle this rather then get a ruling that could be used against them. In the end, all this litigation distracts companies from their main businesses and only hurts customers in the long run. But hey, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the US patent system.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Me, 12 Sep 2007 @ 7:15am

Whoops! I think I stepped in NTP...
Whoops! I think I stepped in NTP...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RandomThoughts, 12 Sep 2007 @ 9:21am

NTP was formed after the failures of companies Tom Campagna had run. It owned the patents of prior companies he had started.

AT&T met with the founder of NTP in 1990 after they learned that he had a way to connect NTPs paging sytem to their email system. AT&T decided to work with someone else after that meeting, then Tom Campana was forced into bankruptcy, walking away with the patents.

Tom Campana didn't sue RIM until RIM sued competitor Glenayre Electronics Inc for voilating RIMs patents. Wait for it, yes, the exact patent that Tom Campana had filed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jordan, 7 Dec 2012 @ 8:05am

This is really interesting. Does this have anything to do with software licensing? My brother wanted to start downloading a ton of stuff so he got a license. It was a really good thing to do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]