YouTube Announces Tool For Angry Copyright Holders

from the the-latest-magic-bullet dept

After many many months of saying the company was "working on it," Google has finally released the details of its tool to help angry copyright holders deal with their content being shared on YouTube. The tool doesn't sound all that surprising. Basically, the company tried to build its own version of Audible Magic's famed "magic bullet" approach to stopping unauthorized sharing. Of course, Audible Magic's solution has run into problems when people realized it doesn't work very well, and you have to wonder how well Google's homebrewed solution will work as well. It's not an easy problem to solve, and going back to the original Napster (which tried to add its own similar filter), people quickly find ways around the filters. There are two noteworthy things in the Google announcement. First, it requires copyright holders to upload their own copies so that Google can match them to the content on the site, and it offers the copyright holder a variety of options beyond just "block any copies." That's where it gets a little interesting. Copyright holders can also choose to leave the content up, but place ads on it, with a split of the ad revenue going back to the copyright holder. In other words, Google is at least encouraging copyright holders to consider that simply taking down the infringing content may not make as much sense as trying to make money off of it. Somehow, we doubt that too many copyright holders will sign up for this "leave it up, but with ads" program, but perhaps we'll be surprised.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, dmca, piracy, video
Companies: google, viacom, youtube


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    TriZz, 15 Oct 2007 @ 7:28pm

    as

    "make as much as sense as trying"

    That has as much 'as' as my sentence does.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    ass, 15 Oct 2007 @ 8:04pm

    Re: as

    you added an "as" yourself.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Oct 2007 @ 9:20pm

    Great Idea

    If the media companies go for this it sounds like a great way to get a huge library of content for free. You just tell the media companies that you plan to start a content sharing site on the net and would like to avoid infringing their content. But first, they need to send you a copy of everything they own. Presto! Free huge library!

    For a little extra incentive on the holdouts, use the Verizon opt-out strategy. Tell them that failure to opt-out by providing you with such material will be considered to be permission for it to be shared.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Oct 2007 @ 9:37pm

    well u never know if there gonna get money they might go for it.

    i wonder will it be the famous google add words or will the copyright holder be able to choose what adds will show on his content. That i bet will something they might want to renegotiate.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Oct 2007 @ 9:55pm

    if TriZz, ass and 2 guys calling them self Anonymous Coward decide to start a content sharing site on the net im pretty sure they will not get the deal youtube / google are getting.

    they would get sued so hard there head will be spinning faster than that girl in the exorcist, by the time there heads stop spinning they'll realized they ow more money than they ever dreamed existed.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Oct 2007 @ 10:28pm

    And this is why we worship Google.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Mike (profile), 15 Oct 2007 @ 10:46pm

    Re: Re: as

    you added an "as" yourself.

    No, Trizz did not. There was a typo in the original, which has been fixed.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Madroadie, 16 Oct 2007 @ 1:56am

    Watch the View Counter disappear

    Didn’t that lady have to pay $220 K for file sharing 24 songs on Kazza? Google does it right in front of everybody and has the gall to ask for half the revenues.

    Lol, they will get away with it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Brian, 6 Dec 2007 @ 8:28am

    The title says YouTube. The article is about Google.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.