Network Solutions And ICANN Both Sued For Allowing Domain Front Running
from the as-expected dept
Back in January, it was revealed that Network Solutions was involved in the rather sleazy practice of registering up any domain you searched for through its search engine, and holding onto it for five days -- unless you bought it through them only. Since Network Solutions charges more than most other registrars, but is generally considered more "trustworthy" as a place to search for domain names, this was a pretty big deal. Lots of people search at NetSol and then register elsewhere -- so by holding on to the domains and forcing you to pay NetSol's inflated prices seemed like a scam. In fact, it seemed quite similar to the sleazy practices of questionable registrars, Network Solutions actually tried to claim it was actually to protect against those questionable registrars. ICANN, reprising its usual role as being powerless to do anything useful, promised to look into the matter, and promptly claimed that Network Solutions was doing nothing wrong. Many people feel otherwise, so it's hardly a surprise to find out that both Network Solutions and ICANN have been sued by lawyers attempting to create a class action suit over the activity. Whether or not it deserves a class action lawsuit is a separate discussion, but it's still difficult to understand how NetSol could possibly think this is a good idea or one that would be welcomed by anyone.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: class action, domain names, front running
Companies: icann, network solutions
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have never had a problem with 1and1. 3 of my clients are currently using them as host and registrar with nary a problem between them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@johndifo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Better registrar...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Class action?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Got me too!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NetSol has gotten me several times
I hate Network Solutions. I hope they're forced to stop this crap.
And by the way, I have almost 100 clients with domains on 1&1 and like Tim, never had a problem either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what goes around
play their game find your website then sit on it for 5 days; otherwise if you want a cheaper rate then find one (like godaddy) then call netsoll and register the domain vs online. they will negiotate!
you said it right SleazeSolutions; mayby someone should get that website and have it point to netsol!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Network Solutions needs to be stopped
When the domain front running news broke in January I swore to never do business with them again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it's not right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Today the domain was available,tomorrow morning the domain is gone ....the registrar blocked the domain before i could register it.
Should be sued to the fullllllll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NetSol Fun
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Happened to me
Crazy. I plan to transfer it later
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NetSol
Registering domain names for the past 13 or so years I have come to realize NetSol cost more becuase you get what you pay for with no headaches. Yes they cost more but so does a Porsche over a Geo. You want more features, better service then you spend the money.
I have never had a hard time dealing with them, never had a domain name issue and never worry that they will close shop and my names become worthless.
Yeah lets register with godaddy and call in for some tech support then get the sales pitch instead of tech support. Never understood why all their tech support people get paid on sales.. "Oh you want that feature to work then you need to buy this product instead"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To register a website best thing wud be to have a list of websites names u hav in mind,check for alternatives,register them on the same day by online.
Simple and clear :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This happened to me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Network Solution's and ICANN liability
I agree that Network Solutions’ business plan to “reserve” all available name search queries was questionable from an ethics and business point of view. I, for one, am surprised that Network Solutions and ICANN have been sued in a class action format.
I originally posted about potential consumer protection liability related to NSI’s reserve policy here, but NSI quickly modified it’s policy and provided adequate notice on its web site in order to inform consumers that it would be reserving searched domains. That post is found here.
Consumer protection lawsuits are all about misrepresentation and deception. Once Network Solutions posted notice on its web site that it would be engaging in this particular business practice, it is hard to imagine how consumers would argue they were “deceived.”
As far as ICANN liability, the only possibility is an argument that Network Solutions was violating the accreditation agreement with ICANN and ICANN failed to follow-up on that known violation. However, I have not seen any good analysis on the Internet which suggests that a violation of policy did occur.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Go domain searching like mad!
Just for giggles I just started, and then canceled, the process of buying qwqrsdfss.com and qwqrsdfss.net from network solutions... $35/year my butt! Anyway, I'm sure they are actively registering those now.
Maybe if everyone goes to their site and looks for some stupid random string of characters it will screw with their system? Just an idea. ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NetSol
I used Network Solutions prior to 1997 and they were even worse than they are today. Privatization is a great idea - this is the real world example.
Support ASCII Art! and Don't kick over the bit bucket!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NetSol Listens... AndActs
Next week ICANN can vote an important issue to resolve to resolve front running for once and for all. Network Solutions is advocating that ICANN acts now, and we have published an official statement on our web site to that end.
Please excuse this URL, but given the seriousness of this issue, it was appropriate to provide a link: http://tinyurl.com/63yaox
Shashi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typicall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]