Verizon Wireless: Open In Name Only?
from the this-is-not-the-'open'-you-were-thinking-of dept
Verizon Wireless got plenty of attention a few months back for announcing that it would be opening its network. This was a bit of a surprise, as Verizon Wireless has been among the most closed when it came to allowing anyone to do anything on its network. Of course, there were few details in the announcement. Now, the company has revealed a bit more about its "open" plans and they're incredibly underwhelming. In fact, you can almost pinpoint the problems based on the the key points Verizon Wireless chose to highlight.First off, in order to get on the network you'll first have to get your device "certified" by Verizon Wireless. While the company insists that "the certification process won't be lengthy, costly or complicated," most people seem to think that it may be all three. It's going to take 4 to 8 weeks to get your device approved, and the expectation is that access will involve per-byte fees. It also means that if you want to use Verizon's new "open" network you have to spend all the time and effort to build a device, and then wait, hope and pray that Verizon "certifies it." Or, you can just ignore Verizon's network altogether and build a GSM-based device and pop in a SIM card and you're ready to go. So, Verizon's "open" network seems a lot more closed, annoying and expensive than the GSM networks that are more widely available.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cdma, certification, open network
Companies: verizon wireless
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Open verizon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why verizon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: why verizon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GSM is king
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GSM is king
Yes, but that's not the only thing that doesn't work in Mexico.
Half the population doesn't work, the mail service doesn't work and ......
That's enough. There's not that much space on here to list 'em all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GSM is king
Truth is, as much as I hate Verizon business style, the call quality/network availability is by far superior to anything GSM has to offer. That also true if compared to overseas GSM service: tried it in Paris, London, Moscow, Buenos Aires... quality of GSM calls sucked (on several "good" handsets I've tried...
The bottom line, they know what they have, and they make you to pay dearly for that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Actually, it's based on quite a few facts...
Yes, to access the open network and use a non VZW devise, it will have to be certified.
Such as that fact.
Of course, you ignore the fact that to put a device on a GSM network, you don't have to be certified, meaning it's cheaper easier and more effective. And, of course, that means it's going to be much more compelling for device makers. Which was the point. Which you claimed wasn't based on fact...
There are good reasons for it and those same reasons are among those that has made Verizon Wireless the most reliable network.
Now *that* statement is based on no facts at all. Every single wireless carrier calls their network "the most reliable network." It's all a lie. Each has problems in different regions and weak coverage in other regions.
That is also the reason Verizon Wireless does not use GSM because it definately is not as reliable.
Actually, if you look at European GSM-based networks, you'll find they tend to be significantly more reliable than American networks (GSM or CDMA).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Call It Progress
And regardless of the fact that it isn't fully open, it still is a great deal more open that it has been in the past, and I call that significant progress. Yes, GSM is more open simply by virtue of the fact that the account info is all stored on the SIM, and the SIM can be slipped into any device you choose.
VZW's openness, to be sure, is mainly the response to competitive pressure from the other carriers (mainly Sprint) that are proposing that their 4G networks will enable any device with an embedded radio. Sprint already proved their intentions with the wireless service bundled in the Amazon Kindle.
As mobile phone penetration approaches saturation, the way to continue subscription growth is to start selling wireless subscriptions not just to people, but to their cars, vending machines, sensors, laptops, cameras, etc.
But Mike, you're wrong about the "relative ease" of launching a GSM solution. There are also certification standards for GSM devices (see http://kiica-sv.com/printable_view.php?id=72).
And the FCC needs to certify and authorize the use of any cellular radio product for the USA, and believe it or not, so does the FDA (see the bottom of this page http://www.fda.gov/cellphones/).
So it's not like you and I are going to whip up a GSM device in our garage, and start selling it on the web, and people will just slip in their T-Mo SIMs, and we're in business. You need to go through testing and compliance whether you are offering a CDMA device for VZW's "open" network, or one of the more open GSM networks.
And lastly, for all of you prior commenters who are re-igniting the CDMA/GSM battle. They're both very good in different ways. CDMA is a better technology that is more spectrally efficient, does not drop calls on handoff like GSM, and has been universally accepted as the ONLY third generation cellular technology -- um did you notice the 3G version of GSM is called "W-CDMA"? But GSM is more globally adopted, enables much easier roaming, has SMS by default, offers data roaming, has + code dialing for international calls, and has harmonized frequencies across most of the world. So both have their advantages, and each user needs to choose what works for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FCC and the wireless auction
The FCC is a joke when it comes to the people. Fat cat lobbyist for the telecoms spread the wealth pretty well at the FCC making it pretty much impossible that the end user's needs or concerns will ever be heard again!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
open network
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it makes sense to limit at first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]