Patriots Still Want 19-0 Trademark; So They Can Pretend They Had A Perfect Season
from the someone-sack-the-lawyer dept
Right before the Super Bowl this year, we noted that the New England Patriots had filed for a trademark on "19 - 0" to be used in merchandise commemorating what the team believed would be the culmination of an undefeated season. This, by itself, was rather ridiculous, as the idea that one team could trademark its won-loss record seems totally unacceptable. It also showed off a bit of hubris, which got knocked back down to earth by Eli Manning and the NY Giants in an unexpected upset of the Patriots in the Super Bowl. However, it appears that the Patriots are still pursuing the trademark despite its final record of 18-1. The Smoking Gun noticed that a lawyer for the team recently updated the trademark application, fixing a typo (changing "toy bans" to "toy banks") which suggests that the team still wants the trademark, despite not having actually won the Super Bowl and not actually having a 19-0 record. Perhaps the team figures that it talked about it enough that people will actually think it was undefeated, allowing the Patriots to cash in on the term. Or maybe the team figures that if it can't own a 19-0 record, no one should be able to. Either way, when the story first broke, the NY Post had jokingly applied for a trademark on 18-1. If the Patriots really do continue to pursue this 19-0 trademark, then hopefully the Post will continue to pursue its trademark as well.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: football, new england patriots, trademark
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pat Riley
The only difference here is that the Patriots are buying an empty trademark. Nobody's going to go 19-0 anytime soon, and they proved it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pat Riley
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pat Riley
This one on the other hand was trying to trademark *the score itself*. If it were to be successful, no other team would be able to describe their undefeated season without violating the trademark in some way. Very stupid, and it would be a travesty if this were trademarked.
"Nobody's going to go 19-0 anytime soon"
Who knows? Maybe it'll happen next season, maybe in 50 seasons. The thing is, this trademark would adversely affect anyone who did achieve that, and as such shouldn't be allowed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pat Riley
"Threepeat" is a neologism. "19-0" is a won-loss record that many teams have achieved in various sports and many more will in the future. If they are granted this trademark, our system is absolutely beyond repair and ought to be dismantled and/or ignored. Certainly subverted at every opportunity.
I mean, if they had tried to trademark "The New England Patriots went 18-1 in 2007" it would make more sense than the notion of trademarking simply three digits and a dash.
Can I trademark "411" and have every phone system in the world pay me? Or how about "911" and shut down every emergency system? Maybe I can trademark "69" and spoil a lot of couples' fun. Maybe I can trademark "867-5309" and never have to hear that awful song again. "Niiy-ee-eyeeen", indeed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I really do not think they should be able to trade mark 19-0 since like someone else mentioned...there are other sports that could end up with that score easily (NBA comes to mind easily). So if lets say some NBA team goes 19-0 in the beginning...will they have to pay up until the next game? Just doesn't seem right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: New England what?
People need to get the hell over it and realize that last season is last season. No more will come of this aside from stupid fans making themselves look even more stupid with asinine comments.
By the way, wasn't this an article about frivolous and unnecessary trademarks?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: New England what?
Please back this up with a link that has evidence, otherwise don't say it. Just makes you look like ever other idiot on the internet that knows everything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New England what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New England what?
Oh man, I remember that trip. Remember what Fred tried to do? Classic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I will trademark the other 18 combinations...
18-1, 17-2, 16-3, ... 0-19
Although, 3-16,2-17,1-18,0-19 are not really possible.
(Not possible to loose 15 regular season and then go to super-bowl)
and of course if you are not super-bowl/playoff material then you can trademark;
16-0, 15-1, 14-2, ... 0-16
The combinations are endless, literally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I will trademark the other 18 combinations...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I will trademark the other 18 combinations...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LMAO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Preemptive
As far as the Dolphins go maybe they should Trademark 0-19 as will be their stats next season ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Super-Bowl 7(VII) Miami Dolphins undefeated...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
just another word for mediocre
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And I think I'll trademark "New England Cheatriots" and start collecting royalties.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Taping defensive signals IS NOT illegal.
The legality of such an action is dictated by WHERE you tape from.
Rules stipulate that you are only allowed to tape from the end zones, no where else.
THAT is why the Pats got busted - they taped from the SIDELINES.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That's true but when ranting on a blog, having factual information is not necessary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like the old saying says...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cheatriots.
Maybe the Patriots (and I agree with renaming them Cheatriots) should apply for the title "top of the list of losers" since that is only what they are ... just another loser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That being said, I would like to know how this blog post even remotely relates to the world of technology. After all, this is "Tech" dirt. This is definitely dirt, but where's the tech?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Three years of disuse = abandonment
It has to happen within the next three seasons. If they don't use the mark for three years, it is declared abandoned. Odds are they're just throwing their money away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Three years of disuse = abandonment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Three years of disuse = abandonment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Keep telling your self that. You will feel much better than if you had thoughts like "if they didn't secretoly film the all the opposing teams' defense and study it, maybe they would be 9-7 for the season".
Now THAT'S a bad thought so I agree we should all keep thinking it's the first thought. Denial makes me feel better too. In fact, the surge is working and Hillary doesn't lie. See how easy that was?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Much ado about nothing
I'm sure the Patriots filed an intent-to-use application, but it would be pretty easy to show that the Pats do not have a bona fide intention to use the mark after losing the big game. Seriously, folks, give it a rest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades
[ link to this | view in chronology ]