Bad Day For The RIAA: Two High Profile Cases Go Against RIAA
from the judges-getting-things-right dept
Well, well, well. The RIAA is not having a particularly good week. In the Tanya Andersen case (where the RIAA sued an innocent person), the court has awarded Andersen $108,000 in legal fees from the RIAA. You may recall that the RIAA had protested having to pay legal fees, which the judge smacked down. Note that this is entirely separate from Andersen's racketeering case against the RIAA.However, the much bigger news concerns the infamous Jammie Thomas case. As you'll recall, the RIAA won that case, even though it now admits that it said false things under oath. Much of that decision hinged on the fact that the court said that "making available" was infringement, which is the opposite of what many other courts have been saying. In fact, it turns out that it went against the binding precedent in a different case within the same circuit. The judge has now admitted that he may have committed a "manifest error of law" in his jury instructions, and it sounds like he's going to order a new trial.
This is a big deal. The RIAA has been holding up the Thomas case over and over again as proof that (a) "making available" is infringement and (b) that courts will award huge fines for those caught file sharing. If that decision gets tossed out (not even by an appeals court, but by the judge who ruled in the first place), it will suddenly make the RIAA's claims relating to that case disappear completely.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jammie thomas, legal fees, making available, riaa, tanya andersen
Companies: riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
WOW, Excellent
eleete
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Awarding" may not mean "won"
Then there's the matter of actually getting the RIAA to pay up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Owned
[ link to this | view in thread ]
finaly the light at the end of the tunnel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "Awarding" may not mean "won"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "Awarding" may not mean "won"
Anyway... Not to mention the basic fact here: "Winning" this case simply shows that Tanya Anderson successfully proved her innocence. It does not address the legality or morality [sic] of the RIAA's tactics... let alone the legality of file sharing.
When a judge awards huge punitive damages against the RIAA because if its tactics... that'll be a great day for freedom! or at least for the cause.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's perjury and contempt and should be treated as such - but let me guess, they'll get a pass..
But God help me if I did it against them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Punative what?
And as Overcast stated, what about the lies? SHould more cases be reviewed?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Now who wants to start a countdown until the inevitable bill that criminalizes "making available" appears in Congress?
I give it one month from the date the Jammie Thomas verdict is overturned.
Come on, you KNOW that the entertainment industry isn't going to let the number one argument for suing file sharers just be taken away from them. When they can't win under current laws, they buy new ones.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My Name is
I am above the law though you must submit.
My name is RIAA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RIAA problems
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "Awarding" may not mean "won"
The Jammie Thomas case is even better news - the original ruling was based on a clear misinterpretation of law, and now that this has been realised it's going to be extremely hard for the RIAA to win the new trial.
The only problem with these cases is the length of time they are taking. While it's good that victories are being made and the RIAA keeps losing, I wonder how many people are seeing these cases and just going "to hell with that, I'll just pay" when the RIAA threat comes through their door. Both of these women have been through hell and probably serious financial debt to prove their points. Not everyone can do that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]