Overstock Sues New York Over Questionable Tax Collecting Law
from the and-here's-another-one dept
Back in April, New York state signed into law a very questionable bill that effectively made any affiliates of your service (i.e., anyone advertising your services) considered as representing a "local presence" for your company for tax purposes. The law had no reason for existing other than to try to squeeze extra tax money out of online retailers. Amazon quickly sued over the law and Overstock has now followed suit, filing a lawsuit against the tax law. Overstock, of course, has taken its reaction even further, banning all New York affiliates as long as this law is in place. The effective result of the law, then, is that it actually ends up harming residents of the state while not doing very much to actually increase tax revenue. It seems quite likely that this law will get tossed out, as it seems to go entirely against earlier rulings on what constitutes a physical presence in the state.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: affiliates, new york, taxes
Companies: amazon, overstock
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
see how long people will stay quiet and the law reversed...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is just one problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who needs to advertise?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who needs to advertise?
When you go on Amazon and buy a used book, it doesn't come from Amazon's warehouses at all, but rather some other book shop.
So, if they have 1 affiliated seller in NY, suddenly Amazon has a "presence" there and they can start collecting tax on everyone in the state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newegg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Newegg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Newegg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Representation ?
Am I suppose to do things in my constituents best interest ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gasp a reasonable lawsuit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Similar Law
In our tax forms there is a section for "Use Tax" where we are supposed to write down everything we bought over the internet that we didn't pay sales tax on, and then calculate out our 6% sales tax on it, and then pay that to the Michigan Government.
It is preposterous. But they do not target the businesses themselves. This shows why.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Similar Law
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Similar Law
I'm no tax accountant, but I believe that all states have a use tax. If you buy something from an out-of-state catalog or Internet site, the company doesn't charge a sales tax, but that doesn't mean you don't owe any tax. It's based on the honor system, but you are actually supposed to record those purchases and pay the tax.
So, in one way, all New York is doing is shifting the tax collection from one mechanism -- a use tax, which no one knows about or pays attention to -- to another, a direct line-item charge on the original bill. But in the end, your tax liability is the same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Never Enough
JJ
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We have to protect the children, and you can't do that without a lot of taxes. There are so many things for the nanny state to protect us from....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
new york should just raise....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Democrats Love Taxes
Don't post your indignation over a few dollars of sales tax when the tax these two loons are proposing will put the US into a huge recession. If you think it's bad now, wait until the "rich" have to pay more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newegg.com is complying
I do thousands of $'s worth of business with Newegg and several other online computer parts suppliers, and I recently received an e-mail from all of them that stated that Starting June 1st, they will start charging sales tax to New York shipping addresses.
I wish that more large companies such as Newegg were going after this law. Hopefully the law will get tossed out, but without pressure from many large sellers, it will likely go without arguement, since so many companies are just accepting it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Newegg.com is complying
Enough people do that, maybe they'll change their policy. If they don't, then someone else will take their place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ultimately a losing cause...
Bottom line, in every state I've been in, you have to pay a sales tax (i.e. called a 'use tax') when ordering product from out of state. As part of our business, we regularly pay use taxes on Internet purchases for stuff that isn't for re-sale. Sucks, but we do it because it is the law and one that has auditors.
If you ignore the fact that you don't like to pay "extra" money/tax, having a taxable online purchase levels the playing field for a local merchant.
If you really have a problem with the use tax, you should also be consistent and fight to get rid of the sales tax in your state.
For what it's worth, if they can't get it from online retailers, expect the state auditors to start adding a check list to any audits the cross-references credit card recipients and use tax submissions along with a nice penalty to make sure the word gets out and makes everyone audit'd a poster child for the use tax law.
Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wasn't this country founding on the grounds of being over taxed by Britain only to do it to our own people.
$1
33% - Federal Tax
3-5% - State Tax
Excise Taxes, Cigarette taxes, sales taxes, license taxing, property taxes, liquor taxes.
More than 60% of the money an American makes goes for taxes.
REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't post your indignation over a few dollars of sales tax when the tax these two loons are proposing will put the US into a huge recession. If you think it's bad now, wait until the "rich" have to pay more."
Gosh, and lowering taxes will pay for that war when???? I'd watch who you blame for the coming recession...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YEAH, Like the RePUCKitans wont raise taxes. Need to raise the HAMMER!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WTF NY
This is just like the BS tax overload they put on trucker's gas. Now all truckers get their gas out of state. Yeah, GJ. You effectively cut out all that tax revenue. God. I wish our legislatures were competent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]