Using Google Trends To Determine 'Community Standards' Of Obscenity
from the knew-that-data-would-come-in-handy-sometime dept
While there are plenty of reasons to have trouble with "obscenity" laws, one of the biggest is the ridiculously vague "contemporary community standards" test established by the Supreme Court. How does one show what the community standards are when it concerns activities done in the privacy of one's own home? Well, apparently, at least one defense attorney in an obscenity case has decided that Google Trends is the answer. He's planning to show that more people in the local community are using Google to search for the word "orgy" than for "apple pie" or "watermelon." That's pretty amusing, but probably not very convincing. How often are people really going to search for "apple pie?" Still, it does seem to suggest how silly the whole process is of determining what contemporary community standards should be.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: community standards, google trends, obscenity
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
boobs
Since boobs are so popular, I see no reason why women should be required to cover them in public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: boobs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: boobs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Public At Large
I'd like to see the demographics for the community
in question. To start with, how many residents
are computer users?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Public At Large
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Expanded argument against Google as a Standard
For example, most people think having sex in the bedroom is not obscene (many people do have sex in their bedrooms), but few would have sex in public, because the community considers it obscene despite the number of people having sex in private. Standards in the bedroom are different than standards in public.
Citing Google as a measurement of "community standards" is relevant only to the Internet as a community. If Google Trends showed a majority of people searching for GTA IV, should the acts in GTA IV be made legal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]