Google Wants To Launch MP3 Search In China
from the this-could-get-interesting... dept
When Chinese search engine Baidu first went public, some folks pointed out that the main reason why people used it a lot more than Google was that it had an MP3 search engine, which let people find music to download. Google, being afraid of copyright infringement lawsuits, chose not to have such a specific search engine. Of course, once it had gone public, Baidu attracted the attention of record labels as well, and was quickly sued. However, Baidu eventually won that lawsuit -- which does seem like the right decision. Baidu, as a search engine, isn't making any copies of the file itself at all. It's merely linking to where those files are, and it's difficult to see how that's copyright infringement.Of course, the record labels aren't known for giving up easily, and they simply sued again. However, it appears that Google has seen enough of getting beaten handily in the Chinese market by Baidu, and that initial ruling in favor of Baidu and has apparently decided to set up its own MP3 search engine on its Chinese site. The report notes that Google is first looking to get "approval" from the recording industry, though it's not clear what sort of approval is sought or needed. If it's going to be an industry approved search engine, it's unlikely to do what Google needs it to do. That is, it will most likely be quite limited and locked down, meaning people will just stick with Baidu's.
At the same time, it's still difficult to see why a separate search engine is really necessary. What's wrong with just doing a search with specific parameters included? In fact, some have already automated the process.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, copyright, mp3 search
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But what about all of the branded communities that rely on Baidu's economic impact to make their income?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Baidu is not a music search engine - it hosts music files
They do not deserve your support in this matter and are simply hiding behind the guise of a music search engine.
Just last month, a minor search engine in China called Zhongsou was found guilty of infringement and its servers seized as it was hosting the music files it purported to search for. And this seems to be the practice amongst music search engines in China, led foremost by Baidu.
Yes, it's hard to side with the labels, but you have been duped in this instance.by Baidu.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Baidu is not a music search engine - it hosts music files
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Baidu is not a music search engine - it hosts music files
Not sure what you mean by Branded Community. Well, to be blunt about it, it means that Baidu is actually hosting the files on its server farms to supply its mp3 search service - and it is hosted on its own volition for purposes of fraud. Does that make it as clear as possible?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sue the YellowPages because
Everyone knows that is where the money is.
The next time a bank is robbed, sue YellowPages because the robbers _could_ have used the search to find out where to commit a crime.
Next,
Sue the Newspapers for reporting on weakness in security at the airport.
Sue the local news for reporting problems in police hiring.
They _could_ have provided information that lead to a crime.
Is that not what the RIAA/MIAA is doing, suing information/search/reporting entities that a criminal may have used to commit a crime?
Why not sue Dell/HP/Intel/AMD/Cisco? they make equipment that is used to download load possible mp3 violation. Where does it end?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sue the YellowPages because
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sue the YellowPages because
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BitTorrent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
free mp3 search engine
It works much better to search for MP3's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hi
http://cam.h22h.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]