China Blocks iTunes After Olympic Athletes Download Pro-Tibetan Music
from the so-much-for-the-lack-of-censorship dept
So, while it turned out to be a myth that China would drop the Great Firewall during the Olympics, it's still a bit surprising to hear that China is apparently blocking at least some access to iTunes. Apparently, an organization put out an album of pro-Tibetan songs, and asked Olympic athletes to download the songs and put them on their iPods as a sort of quiet protest. Of course, then the group put out a press release, claiming that 40 Olympians had done so... and, suddenly folks in China are having trouble accessing iTunes. Not surprisingly, a "semi-official news portal" of the Chinese gov't claims that folks in China are denouncing Apple for even offering the music, and are calling for the musicians featured on the album to be banned from playing in China.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, great firewall, itunes, olympics, tibet
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
china
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
And you're right, as far as I'm concerned, supporter of Tibetan independence is no different than Child pornographers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
What a bunch of perverts!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
I personally don't see independance for Tibet as a reality any time soon (and perhaps not even desirable), but I do think that they have a right to express their desire for less repression and some measure of sovereignty over the region.
And please, the child porn line is just plain stupid. Stop with the dumb analogies, please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
the child porn is a fair analogy if you are comparing the US. in the US, anyone under 18 can't be in a porn film. they are very strict about that. in other countries that age is lower, such as 16, 14, or even non-existent, those countries view nothing legally wrong with porn staring younger people while america condemns it completely (it is, for some reason, perfectly fine to watch a film with a girl who just turned 18, but if it was made one week earlier and she was still 17, people would seek the filmmaker's heads on a pike.)
similarly, America views political protest essential to the process of the country while in China it is worth the death penalty.
the analogy was quite accurate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
China didn't just have "Claims" on Tibet either. In fact, at least officially, China had been in control of Tibet ever since Mongol empire took it over. Ming dynasty controlled it, Qing dynasty controlled it, and the Republic of China controlled it. There was a brief time where the Tibetan nobles wanted to declare independence, but nobody in the world recognized it, except the British government who instigated the independence attempt in the first place. This is not something "promulgated" by the Chinese government. It's the historical fact, verifiable through all the historical documents that all the nations kept.
So in no way can you say China "seized" Tibet. The only fair characterization is "reestablished control" over Tibet. Whether the communist government is good for the people or not is a whole other matter, and in no way impact the territorial integrity of a country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
the Tibet supporters are breaking the law in China, they can't act indignant when the country does something like this to stop them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
I just feel sorry for you (....chinese). You don't have any freedom and suppress others too. You can procreate exactly once in life, obey what your govt says and lead a uniformly worse life.
Why should I care as long as I get a dozen socks for $2, created by underpaid 10 year old :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
so, in summary, Yes china is a mess, and yes people SHOULD be able to protest about Tibet, but said protesters should not be surprised when they get punished after breaking the rules of the country they are in.
seriously, it is not a hard concept to understand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
What is your opinion on this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7572033.stm
Just like the government said these people submitted their application and see what happened.
It is just ridiculous. I would guess patriotism is driving you to make such comments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
saying that however, I don't like the way China treated this case. the couple tried to go through the approved channels for something that seems there is no existing law against (like there is with Tibet), and they are being threatened.
this, to me, seems wrong, the country never said there was anything wrong with this style of protest, pretends to encourage it with designated areas and proper processes, and when someone tries to use them, they get threatened.
as a note, just to be clear, I still don't support their silencing of the Tibet problem (or a lot of other things that go on there), but the government has made the issue clear: that people are not to talk about it. when people DO talk about it, they can't act surprised that action is taken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
Who invited you to Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Columbia.....
Americans are just scared to do the right thing (support Tibet), because of commercial regions. There is no oil in Tibet + Chinese will stop trading their cheap goods + US is China's financial bitch (with billions of trade deficits).
Don't hold your breath for Americans to do the right Tibetans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
You guys keep meddling in others' businesses as long as it is financially and politically beneficial. You would never raise your voice for Tibetans, Darfurians etc
Well......... Hope your God (protestant gun-bearing white) saves you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
"if you don't like it, don't go there." Who invited you to Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Columbia.....
Who said XS was American?
XS: ......And you're right, as far as I'm concerned, supporter of Tibetan independence is no different than Child pornographers.
Not American. Clearly from Uranus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
what you are doing is akin to assuming every Englishman loves tea with a passion and it is the only thing they drink. are all Japanese men perverts who like to buy school-girl's panties?
the outside image of a country's inhabitants rarely matches up with an individual's personality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
To sum it up, China sucks. But there is nothing we can really do about it except buy stuff that isn't made there....oh wait, is anything not made there?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
Tibetan song and child porn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
To compare this music downloading of music pertaining to the freedom of an occupied country by a brutal, tyrannical dictatorship to downloading kiddie porn is farking absurd and is insulting to anyone with half a brain...
/I guess that leaves you out...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Service that provide illegal contents deserve to be banned
if you don't like the laws of a country then you take action to either get out of a country and/or get the laws changed. but when you break the laws, don't be surprised when someone tries to punish you or it.
as post # 21 points out, different countries have different views, not only on what consists of "child porn" but whether it is bad or not in the first place. The point is that just because you disagree with a country's laws, doesn't give you right to break them while in the country. in America anything that has people under 18 is child porn if porn from another country where 16 yr olds are legal is brought in by someone that someone will be punished.
the same is true for China. It is illegal to talk about free Tibet. don't pretend to be shocked when they take (again, relatively peaceful) measures to stop the illegal activity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does Tibet have oil, strategic value, what ????
They could attain much better worldwide stature if they were to knock it off already.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You don't give up a large piece of your country just because some religious figurhead supported by CIA want it to rebuild his feudal theocratic rule.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Communism is worse than religion. Religion enslaves just stupid people, but communism does it with half-smart people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As far as referendum is concerned, the overwhelming support given to the communist revolution by the Tibetan serfs in the 1950's had already settled the matter. Plus, if a referendum is held today, the majority of people in Tibet still would want to be part of China. But it wouldn't have mattered because people who supports Tibetan independence has never been about the will of the people to begin with, only their own feeling of racial and moral superiority.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Democracy is better. Want to try some?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tibet
In January 1913 a bilateral treaty was signed between Tibet and Mongolia at Urga. In that treaty both countries declared themselves free and separate from China.
In September 1949, Communist China, without any provocation, invaded Eastern Tibet and captured Chamdo, the headquarters of the Governor of Eastern Tibet. On November 11, 1950, the Tibetan Government protested to the United Nations Organisation against the Chinese aggression. Although El Salvador raised the question, the Steering Committee of the General Assembly moved to postpone the issue. We sold out a friend [again]!
On November 17, 1950, His Holiness the Fourteenth Dalai Lama assumed full spiritual and temporal powers as the Head of State because of the grave crisis facing the country, although he was barely sixteen years old. On May 23, 1951 a Tibetan delegation, which had gone to Peking to hold talks on the invasion, was forced to sign the so-called "17-point Agreement on Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet", with threats of more military action in Tibet and by forging the official seals of Tibet.
The Chinese then used this document to carry out their plans to turn Tibet into a colony of China disregarding the strong resistance by the Tibetan people. What is more, the Chinese violated every article of this unequal 'treaty' which they had imposed on the Tibetans.
On September 9, 1951 thousands of Chinese troops marched into Lhasa. The forcible occupation of Tibet was marked by systematic destruction of monasteries, suppression of religion, denial of political freedom, widespread arrests and imprisonment and massacre of innocent men, women and children.
On March 10, 1959 the nation-wide Tibetan resistance culminated in the Tibetan National Uprising against the Chinese in Lhasa. The Chinese retaliated with a ruthlessness unknown to the Tibetans. Thousands of men, women and children were massacred in the streets and many more imprisoned and deported. Monks and nuns were a prime target. Monasteries and temples were shelled.
On March 17, 1959 the Dalai Lama left Lhasa and escaped from the pursuing Chinese to seek political asylum in India. He was followed by unprecedented exodus of Tibetans into exile. Never before in their history had so many Tibetans been forced to leave their homeland under such difficult circumstances. There are now more than one hundred thousand Tibetan refugees all over the world.
It has been almost 40 years since Chinese occupied Tibet and the destruction of a unique Culture is still going on Tibet, yet the world has not come in aid of Tibet, only lip service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But *why* work harder in a communist system? You get nothing more for it. It's just human nature to want to get some type of reward for effort. Otherwise, what was the point of the effort? It doesn't even really have to be a financial effort - even volunteer members of the peace core would get frustrated if their efforts didn't help those they were seeking to help.
Thing is - the harder work is a benefit to *someone* somewhere, it's only fair and just that the benefit goes to the person actually putting in the work.
Even in the case of the Olympics specifically - let's say it's a 'communist' version of the Olympics. Everyone wins. Everyone gets a Gold. How is there 'fairness' between the guy who practices 80 hours a week as opposed to the guy who works 1 hour a week?
Well maybe some would whine, and instead everyone gets a bronze medal, except for the 'leaders' and 'elites' they get a Gold - for doing nothing. Yet the 'normal' people have to train hard for the Bronze.
Effort and Reward are directly related, regardless of what socialism and communism seek to convince people otherwise of. It's just a fact.
Take money out of the picture entirely:
Athletes who practice harder, perform better.
Farmers who work harder, grow more.
Students who study harder, learn more.
Programmers who work harder, produce better code.
At least - in the *vast* majority of cases the above is true. There should never be a system that rewards everyone the same, because simply - not everyone is the same.
Some people choose to be lazy - their reward should be fitting of the work the put in. Just as well; those who work hard should see a plentiful return for their discipline. Everyone has the same opportunity in a Capitalist System. Those who don't have much, typically haven't done much - of course, that's not *always* true, but usually, it is.
Garbage in - Garbage out. Quality in - Quality out.
Just because one doesn't want to put in additional effort for no additional benefit doesn't mean they are lazy at all - just means they are intelligent.
But in the end - a communist system seeks to reward everyone with the exact same reward, regardless of one's desire. Not everyone's 'reward' is money. Some people choose to do different work and reap a different reward and are perfectly happy doing so. Teachers can be a good example of that. Again, in most cases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I suspect - Chinese people will be patriots even if the Government doesn't *push* them to. There's a lot for the people of China to have pride in.
Is there pride and honor in keeping a tight grip on your subjects? There's pride and honor in discipline and self-control - no doubt.
Just a thought, I have nothing personal against any person of any culture.
Now Governments - that's another matter entirely and I'm not prejudiced - they all suck to a degree... :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I need my Itunes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]