Michael Moore's Lawyers Think They Can Limit BitTorrent To Just US And Canada
from the the-internet-doesn't-have-borders dept
It's always amusing when people seem to think that geographic borders actually apply to the internet. We recently wrote about Michael Moore's plan to freely distribute his latest movie online, which supported Moore's earlier statements saying the greater the number of people who see his movies (for free or not), the better off he is. However, when the movie was finally released online, and users were told to share it, some were reasonably surprised that Moore said it should only be shared in the US and Canada. Of course, once people are distributing it online, national borders are somewhat meaningless. And it seems next to impossible to figure out a way to ask people to share the movie, distributing it via torrent sites... but say that it should only be shared within the US and Canada.However, it appears that Michael Moore's lawyers are now trying to do the impossible. Michael Geist points us to a website that received a DMCA takedown notice for sharing the movie outside the US and Canada. In fact, the lawyers were confused, and the website they sent the takedown to was merely a DNS service, not the webhost, but it appears the lawyers will continue the rather ridiculous task of trying to take down any torrents of the movie outside the US or Canada.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bittorrent, borders, distribution, free, jurisdiction, michael moore, movies
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And for their next trick
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As soon as he doesn't talk out of his ass people will take him more seriously. Most of the time he's talking for the sake of talking.
Sicko was an exception.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you look closely enough at the film, you'll see he makes invalid comparisons and uses time shifting of events to suggest correlation where none actually exists in that film as well.
It just so happens the medical/insurance industry is so screwed up that the actual facts made the hyperbole seem a trivial issue to the overall theme of the film.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wat?
it should only be shared within the US and Canada.
WAT?
What exactly is that?
Tops 500 million people...if every man, woman, and child saw it in North America...
I think maybe...India...no wait, China...or better yet, THE WORLD might maybe have some of those "people" that he could show his biased, possibly unsubstantiated, fact filled movie to.
Hell, I am surprised a lawyer could make heads or tails of that request.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
M Moore
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If MM is a Joke....then
Anyways, im curious if this is something really Michael Moore is believing in or his movie distributor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If MM is a Joke....then
100 years ago,
the 26th President from 1901-1909 is Theodore Roosevelt.
Does anyone know who D. W. Griffith is?
100 years from now,
the 43rd President from 2001-2009 is George W. Bush.
Does anyone know who is M. Moore?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
Which president bankrupt the former USA from 2001-2009?
美国总统布什 (Actually, not sure They will keep that in history).
It will probably be easier to find a copy of M.Moore's work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
Presidents don't spend money. Congress does.
Who's the majority part? Democrats, most of whom are liberals.
Both parties spend way too much, but liberals go above and beyond.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
Not sure how you compare that to Michael Moore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
In his 'film' sicko, he is claiming that the US health care system is the worst in the world. If the health care system is so terrible then why are so many Canadians coming to the US to get health care instead of depending on the government run heath care system in Canada. According to Michael Moore, the US health care system is the worst.
On the same note, why do so many people come to the US for health care instead of other countries that Moore has rated higher on his list? Seems a bit odd that someone can make these claims but refuses to look at the other side of the proverbial coin.
As far as Michael Moore being compared with the KKK, this is how you can rightly compare him with the KKK. The KKK hates blacks, foreigners, Jews and everyone else that is not a "white American". Michael Moore does not consider any point of view that is not his own of that of the bleeding heart liberals. All others are ignored or criticized without even being considered. He is one sided and refuses to even acknowledge the fact that the democrats could be wrong on an issue. That is how you compare Michael Moore and the KKK.
I would even go so far as saying that Michael Moore is like the Nazi party. He only wants people to hear ONE side of the issue (you can't call it an argument if you are not given both sides of the issue). It is either his way or no way. Once again, he has stated that he is "genetically unable to" consider anything associated with the republicans.
I personally relegate his 'works' into the science fiction category or even more appropriately, the 'schlock' movies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
the 26th President from 1901-1909 is Theodore Roosevelt.
Does anyone know who D. W. Griffith is?"
Yeah T.R. was a hero of the rough riders and founder of the Bull Moose party intent on reigning in "Wall Street Speculators". D.W. Griffith was among the first "real directors" in film and is credited with making the first "real" motion pitcure "Birth of a Nation".
"100 years from now,
the 43rd President from 2001-2009 is George W. Bush.
Does anyone know who is M. Moore?"
Yeah George Bush was that cowardly, coke-snorting, draft dodger who used family money, political connections and the easy exploitation of less sophisticated fundamentalist Christians to become the man who most Americans now consider the worst president the United States has ever endured. His legend of wrongheaded ideological decisions, lies, cover-ups, corruption, abuses, malfeasance and open distain for the Constitution will surely live on in infamy for as long as our country exists. Hopefully his legend will at least last longer than the damage he has so carelessly and clearly inflicted on our nation. Oh yeah and Michael Moore was an obese, disheveled guy who made funny movies that embarrassed rich people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: If MM is a Joke....then
The change that we need in this country is to get rid of a lot of the government, get more people to think for themselves and to get more people to be accountable for their own decisions.
Billary tried to introduce communism into the US with their health care plan and the American people saw through the plan and it got shot down. Now Obama is trying a different route toward the same goal. He wants to get more government control over people by hailing it as "positive change". I'm sorry, I just don't want to deal with a government that will hold me as a suspect without any reason. (Check out the lates news about China and Skype).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cost of all this
That sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Far too serious
We should just ignore him & hope he goes away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look at this thread, for example. The title of the article refers to Michael Moore's lawyers, while the linked articles refer to actions taken by his film distributors - apart from earlier statements about how he wants as many as possible to see the movie, I don't see any action taken by Moore himself. Rather, it's distributors and lawyers who seem to be still living in the 90s - a sadly common occurrence in the entertainment industry.
Yet, the response by many on this thread? To directly and personally attack Moore, often for things unrelated to these actions. Not his lawyers or distributors - who will very often take action against Moore's wishes if they believe it's in their best interests.
If you view the political landscape to be black & white, us vs them, as many Americans sadly seem to, it's a shame that you undermine your own causes by being so childish. Moore is a moviemaker who creates documentaries that are openly one-sided and intended to get subjects not normally discussed at the time out in the open. He's egotistical and sometimes undermines his own agenda by ignoring counterpoints and leaning too far on hyperbole, but he often has some very good points. Unlike those who try to attack Moore and make themselves look foolish in response.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Michael Moore is the Michael Savage or Rush Limbaugh for liberals. That is, he spouts garbage, claims it's gospel truth, and his followers think he is next to God. In reality, he is really just the film equivalent of a shock jock like Savage and Limbaugh, and none of those lying, hateful extremists solve anything. You can't expose the truth by lying, even though that's what you claim Moore does.
It is a sad state of the nation when differing political ideas create not discussion and progress, but bigotry and hate. Guys like Moore lead the charge down that destructive spiral.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Michael Moore needs to go to another country and try making a film about that country's way of doing things. He should start off in the middle east or China. I'll be happy to contribute money for a one-way ticket for him to leave the US to one of these places.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That's not what I said, and I think you know it. The thing is, Moore often has some very good points and important arguments, whether or not you actually agree with them. Yet the people who attack Moore often don't attack the views themselves, but rather the man. I rarely see a discussion on one of Moore's films, or a discussion where the films are mentioned, where someone attacks Moore's waistline or makes some blanket assumption of "liberals". As someone who considers himself socially liberal, but not a socialist, hippy or idealist, it always dismays me to see people reject opposing arguments just because the man is "liberal".
That's the kind of discussion you should be avoiding, and if the only response to his arguments people can come up with are weak attacks on his character or appearance while avoiding the issues, you imply that the issues are in fact correct. The only thing that should matter in these discussions are the facts. Attack those, and state why they don't support Moore's conclusions.
"You can't expose the truth by lying, even though that's what you claim Moore does."
You can if the lie contains some measure of truth. To give an example: Sicko is a very one-sided movie that ignores some of the benefits of the US healthcare system while ignoring the very real problems that exist in the socialised healthcare systems he examines.
However, the deeper truths (many Americans - insured or not - are either refused adequate healthcare or bankrupted in ways that *cannot happen* in other systems, the US healthcare system is deeply flawed and biased towards the rich and/or corporations, co-pays are often ridiculous and unmanageable and that affects the standard of preventative medicine, etc.) are very clearly presented.
Most importantly, Moore's film actually got people talking about the US healthcare system. Compared to the daily rants of the radio/TV shock jocks you mentioned, Moore's films are blips on the radar. They surface occasionally, with a very strong message that needs to be discussed. Whether you like the presentation or not, the subjects (healthcare, gun control, terrorism, the competency of the sitting US president, etc.) are very important for people to talk about. If it takes Moore's approach to encourage discussion, so be it.
Or, you can attack Moore or be like the idiots above and below who seems to think that any positive comment on Moore has to be from the man himself. Nobody believes Moore is perfect, few believe that his approach is absolutely correct, but we should be discussing these issues with or without him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
to keep-it local on the internet
Set-up a web page, stream-it from there, pay up broadband and keep-it close, for a free distribution form, (P2P like, forget-it...) it goes world-wide whatever he wants...
just my 2cents on the side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
limit to the US & Canada! Ha!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@#5
I don't think it works really well anywhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it's a waste to try and restrict it to CDN and US, but whatever...
Michael Moore is definitely on the fringe, but without people on that outer edge, questioning our current understanding of things and questioning the current way of doing things, our perspective and vision can get more and more narrow over time.
Womens rights, emancipation, child labour, and a host of other issues were all at one time "fringe" issues, taken up as causes by people that were dismissed much like Michael Moore is often dismissed.
I think it would be pretty hard to say that "Bowling for Columbine" hasn't had at least some impact on the general public opinion regarding the issues presented. Even if it has only been to stir discussion (which I think is really his goal)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I think it's a waste to try and restrict it to CDN and US, but whatever...
Michael Moore alters the truth in way that makes it fit his story even if his story is not true. That is not journalism or documentary film making. What he is doing is just fiction at best (and even that is a stretch).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
email from MM
Thanks for signing up to download Slacker Uprising. It is available for free as a gift from me to all of you. And you have my permission to share it or show it in any way you see fit.
Watch it all: http://slackeruprising.com/download/location.php?utm_medium=download&utm_source=32058568
At that link, there are five ways you can watch it free and without advertising:
1. blip.tv is providing streaming right from slackeruprising.com, free of commercials and advertising.
2. Amazon Video on Demand is providing a higher resolution version of the above stream for people with lots of bandwidth.
3. iTunes makes it easy for you to download "Slacker Uprising" on your iTunes, iPod, or Apple TV, and view it there or transmit it to your television. This way, the film can be portable as well as for home viewing.
4. Hypernia is providing bandwidth and servers to host MPEG4 and DivX versions of "Slacker Uprising" online, so you can burn a DVD or download the film to watch on your computer, XBOX, or PS3.
5. Lycos is providing free streaming of the film and an on-demand version.
Stream it, download it, burn it now. It's the first time a major feature-length film is being released for free on the internet. You can be part of this historic moment by logging on now!
Enjoy!!
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com
SlackerUprising.com
P.S. Remember, we're doing something that's never been done, so I have no idea how it will all go! Don't give up if it seems to go slow (like with any streaming, give the downloading a head start before you hit play), and don't forget there are two places where you can actually download it to your hard drive and three ways to stream it. You can get to all of them at the link above.
P.P.S. If you're not yet registered to vote, here's a good link: https://www.voteforchange.com/.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: email from MM
LMAO.......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Griffith and Moore
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Griffith and Moore
Example:
Wall 1: A dart sticks in a picture of the Pope.
Wall 2: A dart lands on "rumored to..."
Wall 3: Dart lands on "be a spy."
I can see Michael Moore using the same technique to gather his "facts".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overseas money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
About the only way to get anything out of his movies is to watch one while downing a fifth of rot-gut, paint stripping whiskey!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael Moore's 'foreign policy'?
I personally would be glad to contribute to a fund for a one-way airline ticket for Michael Moore. If we can get the money together I would love to send him to the middle east, to China or some other country that does not give its citizens the same freedoms we have here in the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael Moore's 'foreign policy'?
I personally would be glad to contribute to a fund for a one-way airline ticket for Michael Moore. If we can get the money together I would love to send him to the middle east, to China or some other country that does not give its citizens the same freedoms we have here in the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]