Stanford Creates Database Of Patent Litigation
from the looks-useful dept
Over at Stanford, some law professors have been putting together a database of IP litigation from the past few years, called the Stanford IP Litigation Clearinghouse. The Law.com article claims that there are "surprising" facts already coming out of the database, but they don't seem to be any different than what's been known for a while (specifically, that the number of patent lawsuits has been relatively constant over the past few years). Of course, part of the reason is that more infringement lawsuits have been filed against many defendants at once, rather than against just one or two. In fact, the database does show a big jump in the number of defendants.Also, it's worth noting that the database leaves out all of the folks who paid up a settlement because it's simply not worth going to court or (even worse) those who never even bothered to create a product due to chilling effects from those claiming IP ownership. Still, it's good to have more data and to have that data more widely available for analysis.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
As hard as it may be for some to believe, many cases of infringement never get to the lawsuit stage because the defendant agrees that an infringement has occured and that an accomodation needs to be worked out with the patent holder.
As for the latter group mentioned in the quote, it does seem a bit difficult to gather objective data about people who chose not to develop something because of your so-called "chilling effects". I have as yet to see a patent that cannot be designed around to avoid infringement. I am sure that sometimes designing around may not be possible, as in the case of a truly breakthrough invention, but these are few and far between.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is why several texts throughout history (ex: The Art of War) try to teach the military's of their nations to overwhelm and destroy the enemy utterly as quickly as possible. You'll have to do less fighting overall as a number of the enemy will refuse to fight and desert or surrender.
Evidence of "chilling effects" are also present in less lethal forms of human interaction, litigation being a common one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So... you've not read any recent patents?
(PS Thank you for your properly spelled, well-worded, opinion; please feel free to include facts next time.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yes, I do read with regularity many issued patents. It would be foolish for me to not agree than some are very broad in their claim language. Even so, the CAFC is well aware of this happening and has likewise promulgated direction and legal rules to limit claim scope to that which is disclosed in the specification of the patent and obvious variants. Claims are not interpreted solely on the basis of what they say. Much more enters into the calculus of claim scope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But everyone wants to know
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
True value of patents
The thing to realize about litigation, however, is that it is the result of a failure in overall technology licensing. This is a tiny fraction of the much larger value created by successful technology licensing programs. The entire chemical industry, for example, is based on successful technology licenses from technology producers to technology users. These people by and large understand and respect patents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: True value of patents
Of course, there are those who say that without the patents, industry could adopt these processes, but then everyone would use the same processes without seeking alternatives (promoting progress) to reducing costs. In the end, more options are developed and in the long run costs are driven down more than they would have been if everyone had "innovated" the original process rather than exploring a plurality of options.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sex
[ link to this | view in chronology ]