Stanford Creates Database Of Patent Litigation

Piracy Saves Another Lost Video

from the and-yet-again dept

Mon, Dec 15th 2008 6:08pm — Mike Masnick

We've talked about how "piracy" ended up saving the "lost" ending to the movie Little Shop of Horrors, and now it looks like something similar has happened over in the UK. As a bunch of readers have sent in, apparently the BBC, in an effort to save archival space, had gotten rid of some old television shows. In one case, the BBC had discarded both the color version of a show and the audio track, but the show's presenter had made his own audio recordings and, when synched up with the TV show -- and then colorized -- the BBC could bring it back close to what it once was. Yet, as TorrentFreak notes, this was basically "pirated" audio. But, once again, such things are turning out to be quite useful as an alternative for storage.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: lost video, piracy
Companies: bbc

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Sos, 15 Dec 2008 @ 6:42pm

Piracy?
How is this piracy? The article doesnt say that Ed Doolan distributed the recordings (for profit or not). The recordings wernt used for any other purpose so there is no copyright infringement either. Is the act of recording publicy broadcast information considered piracy now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 16 Dec 2008 @ 12:35am
  
  Re: Piracy?
  It was an unauthorised duplication of the show that was stored in violation of the relevant UK copyright law (which i believe only allows you to store a viodeo recording for 3 months).
  
  Since it violated copyright, it was a "pirate" copy in the same way that the movie ripped from an internet stream is a "pirate" copy regardless of whether you upload it to someone else or not.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rose M. Welch, 16 Dec 2008 @ 10:38pm
  
  Re: Piracy?
  Yes.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Dec 2008 @ 6:46pm

I'm pretty sure in Britain such recording would be considered illegal. The BBC operates differently than US television broadcasts.
Whether it is illegal or not in the US, i'm sure any RIAA lookalike would be all over it.
That's the point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Dec 2008 @ 9:26pm

There were several Doctor Who episodes that would have been lost had it not been for those who recorded them at home. Some of them were lost because the BBC ran out of money and recorded over the originals! This was when they started using tape instead of film at some point in the 1970s and early 1980s.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 16 Dec 2008 @ 12:39am
  
  Re:
  Yes, that's right - a lot of classic BBC content was lost when they started recording over old shows (they didn't foresee a market for such material until much later).
  
  This isn't a phenomenon just on tapes either - for example, F.W. Murnau's Nosferatu is only available today thanks to pirates (the legit copies were destroyed by Bram Stoker's estate after a successful copyright lawsuit).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 16 Dec 2008 @ 12:40pm

He should be forced to destroy those illegal recordings!!!

(That's sarcasm for those who can't tell)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]