Connecticut Government Bails Out Newspapers

from the will-it-impact-coverage? dept

A few readers have sent in the news that Connecticut lawmakers have stepped in to save two newspapers in the state, that were about to be shut down. This is raising all sorts of questions about the separation of government from the press. What's scary is that just a few years ago, such an idea was used as satire. Then it became a serious suggestion and now it's happening. Of course, the big question is about how this will impact coverage. It is possible for the government to own a newspaper and still have that newspaper report critically on that government... but it's definitely harder, and a lot of people may wonder about how closely the papers will monitor government officials.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bailout, connecticut, government, newspapers


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 16 Jan 2009 @ 4:12pm

    Heh.

    I bet John Rowland is wishing he thought of this.

    (Google is your friend.)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    DueDoe, 16 Jan 2009 @ 4:53pm

    Banks

    Before long We The People will own a lot of big banks and the little banks get loans from the big ones. Wonder if it will make it easier to get a low interest business loan without dealing with the SBA clowns???

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jan 2009 @ 4:54pm

    Change

    This is the "change" we've been promised.

    Change from capitalism to socialism.
    Change from freedom to equality.
    Change from gov watchdog to obedient pet.

    I "hope" everyone's happy!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 16 Jan 2009 @ 4:59pm

      Re: Change

      You do realize, that most of this 'socialism' was initiated and enacted by a Republican president.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 16 Jan 2009 @ 5:05pm

        Re: Re: Change

        Yeah, you're right but since when has any political party been interested in preserving that status quo.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        socialist pig, 16 Jan 2009 @ 5:09pm

        Re: Re: Change

        of course you realize this socialism was put in place by a democrat congress and an undermined hamstrung president

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          holy crap, 16 Jan 2009 @ 5:37pm

          Re: Re: Re: Change

          Wow ... I know I shouldn't respond to ridiculous comments made by ill informed self righteous trolls.

          Do you have any idea what the definition of socialism is ?

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            country going to HE*L in a handbasket, 17 Jan 2009 @ 2:17pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Change

            yeah...two words

            Barak Obama

            link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        jeri, 10 Mar 2009 @ 8:21pm

        Re: Re: Change

        Of course Bush started this mess, but that doesn't mean Obama has to add to it! Who cares who started it (are you a third grader?). I just want the govt, whoever it is comprised of, to get its big fat nose out of my life!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dale, 16 Jan 2009 @ 5:34pm

    government newspaper

    This bail out fever has hit an all new high if this true.

    Freedom of the press is a constitutional right as with religion. Government must not have any pull one way or the other with either.

    It is better to let the newspapers close than have a propaganda tool at their disposal.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Reed, 16 Jan 2009 @ 7:29pm

    If only!

    If only someone had bailed out the horse whip manufactures, we could still have horse and buggies on the road.

    That's ok though, at least we will still have newspapers in Connecticut. Considering that no one under the age of thirty relies on newspapers for information points to why this bailout is so important...

    Really, I almost want to start a failing business model just so I can get bailed out. Seems to be the new way of doing business in the United Corporations of America.

    One nation under fascism with credit and bailouts for all!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    alex, 16 Jan 2009 @ 8:01pm

    Hypocrisy

    Free market capitalists are the most hyporctical group in the world. It turned out everybody cheated, everybody lied, risk was spread everywhere, it has all been a ponzi scheme.

    Then we go with the free market solution for a single large institution, Lehman, and its failure triggers a massive global meltdown. The free market is a powerful thing.

    And the had-been survival of the fittest jokes beg for money. They beg the government to save them, please, they are too big to fail. It is the champions of free-market uber succes who led us to whatever comes next.

    Classical economics is like classical music, old. It is old men who want to be the richest and hold on to power til they die. So they insured their sick socio-pathetic livelihoods of self-righteousness and gross overindulgence, by holding the fate of the world hostage, ha.

    Stop talking ideologies, fundamentalism is for the birds. Who ever said freedom meant being able to own 5 houses, planes, billions? A gay couple cannot marry, while all the Bernie MAdoff's and corporate titans demand their right to borrow 100x what they possess and bet it on garbage they invented. Land of the free.

    Nobody reads newspapers anyway, who cares what they say?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Joe the Taxpayer, 19 Jan 2009 @ 10:26am

      Re: Hypocrisy

      It was government intervention, forcing the banks to make bad loans to inner-city folks, in the name of "affordable housing", which caused the failure.

      Hardly free-market.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Tony, 19 Jan 2009 @ 10:48am

      Re: Hypocrisy

      Of course, REAL "free market capitalists" are ALSO saying that the companies that screwed up should be allowed to pay the price of their failure. Failure is an integral part of the free market - and that's the part that's missing.

      It's not the free market capitalists who are trying to prevent companies from failing.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jan 2009 @ 9:07pm

    Class Warfare

    privatized profits
    socialized debt

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jeffry Houser (profile), 17 Jan 2009 @ 5:56am

    Despite the headline in the Fox News site; the actual report does not use the term bailout. They are offering incentives. Doesn't government offer such incentives to public / private businesses all the time [at both the local and federal level]?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Jan 2009 @ 7:06am

    Pravda

    Izvestiya Sovetov Narodnykh Deputatov SSSR

    Maybe we can have Bill Ayers as the Editor-In-Chief?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Solzynitsan, 17 Jan 2009 @ 9:45am

    Can You Spell CCCP?

    Soviet Union anybody? It didn't die - it moved to the North American continent.

    A Republican President may have started it, but it was approved by a Democratic controlled Congress and it's going to be made more prevalent by the new Messiah - er, President.

    In Connecticut they're all Communists anyway.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 17 Jan 2009 @ 12:37pm

      Re: Can You Spell CCCP?

      and in related news people continue to troll their perverted personal views on internet blogs

      film at eleven

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Corrupticut, 17 Jan 2009 @ 2:52pm

    CT Gov't bails out failing newspapers

    Bailout or incentives it makes no difference CT Government controls its infrastructure including the media that's why it's the most corrupt State in the Union and its the template for other states.

    We are not a FREE society. The PEOPLE have to wake up and take our Government back. Sign petitions and send them to your Legislators; they won't respond effectively so keep harassing them on a Public Forum. Start up rallies; Picket your Legislative Building. If we want CHANGE, we as a society have to fight for it and stop expecting State Government to look after the public's best interests vs their own.

    There will be a rally at the Capitol in Hartford, CT on February 7th; 1pm; be there!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Seamus McCauley (profile), 19 Jan 2009 @ 3:00am

    BBC?

    "It is possible for the government to own a newspaper and still have that newspaper report critically on that government(?)"

    By most definitions the government "owns" the BBC in Britain, since the BBC is funded via a hypothecated tax on all British TV owners that the BBC has to renegotiate with the government every ten years. It's impossible to say, of course, whether BBC news would be even more critical of the government under some hypothetically different funding arrangement but under the current arrangement it's pretty far from being a mere pro-government shill.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    directory, 19 Jan 2009 @ 5:23am

    Won't they still go under????

    Bailouts aren't the answer.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Oh Really Now, 19 Jan 2009 @ 5:52am

    But what about the telegraph industry? Or the smoke signals companies?

    I can't afford my can on a string, either.

    Obviously, I'm asking why bail out/preserve dying forms of communication.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    joe88, 12 Feb 2009 @ 9:53pm

    hi

    hi,
    No matters if the market has to face the failures. It is the part of the business.

    joe
    FSBO

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    stellaf, 12 Feb 2009 @ 11:00pm

    Hi,

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    seibert, 28 May 2009 @ 12:26am

    about

    The people are losing their moral while becoming modern. The society needs to be attentive that moral values. Well things needs to be modernized but keeping intact with moral values.

    seibert

    mls

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.