Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government
from the look,-this-is-something-only-we-can-do dept
The Eleventh Commandment (paraphrased from the original Homer Simpson):
THOU SHALT NOT HORN IN ON THY [GOVERNMENT'S] RACKET
Lots of nations are surveillance states. Very few engage in the depth and breadth of surveillance China does. Whatever any other country does, China has already done, redone, and modded to abstraction. The government not only loves deploying facial recognition tech, but is working on adding things like racial recognition to keep an eye on pesky foreigners and unwanted minorities.
It's one thing if the government does it. It's apparently quite another if private companies try to get in on the Big Brothering.
Many Chinese provinces and cities have explicitly legislated against companies collecting facial recognition information from late last year to early this year, and it appears that a subsidiary of XPeng Motors has ignored those regulations.
An XPeng sales company in Shanghai was recently fined RMB 100,000 ($15,710) by local market regulators for illegally collecting facial recognition information, according to an administrative penalty decision included by data provider Tianyancha.
The irony of forbidding the use of private facial recognition tech is probably lost on the Chinese government. I mean, it doesn't seem to appreciate any form of humor, even grimdark irony like fining a private company for stepping on its surveillance turf.
It may be unfair to single out China for this sort of thing. It happens everywhere. Countries where facial recognition tech has been deployed by governments also have laws in place that forbid the same sort of collection by private companies. In some US states, government use is legal but private use violates local laws. In most of the US, though, it's still the tech Wild West, with both governments and private entities subject to few guidelines or regulation.
But you can't applaud the Chinese government for taking a tough stance on surveillance tech use by private entities. It clearly finds nothing wrong with its pervasive, ever-expanding surveillance state, which makes its regulation of private use extremely hypocritical. And the fact that it works closely with local companies to expand its surveillance opportunities makes its double-standard especially pronounced.
Xpeng, for its part, claims this was all a mistake. It claims a subsidiary purchased the cameras from a third party and deployed them without verifying they complied with local laws. But that doesn't explain how this oversight went unnoticed for nearly six months, resulting in the collection of nearly 450,000 facial images.
But this fact is undeniable: if these cameras had been operated by the government and trained on people doing nothing more than buying cars, it all would have been above-board. The Chinese government can't possibly justify all the surveillance it engages in. It does it because it can. But the far more innocuous collection of information to analyze customer demographics is apparently where the Chinese government draws the line.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, facial recognition, government, private companies, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
America is like totally different, Dude
this could never ever happen in U.S.
All American government agencies strictly follow American laws, especially regarding surveillance -- just ask the NSA CIA FBI ICE DEA or any local police dept.
And American government would never ever prosecute private citizens for doing illegal actions that the government does routinely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: America is like totally different, Dude
The first example that came to mind?
Collecting taxes. There's even a name for that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: America is like totally different, Dude
Membership?
HOA?
Subscription?
Any of the many other forms of regular payment by individuals to an organization in exchange for participation in a shared resource, just like taxes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Despite understanding the depth of the Chinese surveillance state and how oppressive it it for its citizens, I do not get the hypocrisy in the decision of using it for government purposes and denying it for private ones. Surveillance is a military technology, and as such the state has the monopoly over its use in China, as it is with data interception for example, or nuclear arms, or many other technologies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Winny the Poo and the Toe jam that is the CCP
Is an oppressive joke lined with incompetent hypocrites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]