Is DRM In Retreat?
from the perhaps,-but-it's-not-dead-yet dept
Ed Felten has a post up noting that it appears DRM is in retreat, at least in certain areas, such as music. Of course, he points to Apple's agreement to get rid of DRM as a key factor -- but also notes that the former "DRM Watch" blog, from one of DRM's biggest supporters, is now called Copyright and Technology. Still, while it does appear that some are realizing the pointlessness of DRM, it's still not really dead yet. We noted that Apple still uses DRM in many areas and Microsoft just brought back DRM in its mobile music offering. Of course, that will backfire too, but it shows that there are still people out there who seem to believe that DRM actually has some kind of benefit.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I bet you meant..
I'm rather than "im"
CDs rather than CD's
I've rather than "ive"
light rather than "lite"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I bet you meant..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I bet you meant..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I bet you meant..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
short and long title answer: no
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I bet you meant..
The web is an informal place for people to share their ideas and opinions. Who gives a shit if someone misspelled a word or used a instead of an? Oh yeah also it's called the "world wide web" for a reason, not everyone who comments on here comes from your same background/ amount of anal retentiveness.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a little off topic with the grammar lessons
I can't wait till the day DRM is done for. If these companies are going to sell us something we should be able to have control over our purchased 'tangible' copy. If the record companies told me I couldn't keep my cds after I had played them too many times I'd pull a Charlton Heston and have them "come pry them from my cold dead fingers"
oh yeah and Nate it should be 'need' not 'needs'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I bet you meant..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I bet you meant..
It's rather than Its.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I ain't gay but Nate sucks
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just a reminder...
Yeah, that's what consumers want... more expensive downloads for a damn-near zero cost distribution system.
I'm glad to see DRM going away. Now, maybe my newest DVD player can actually play DVDs again.
*sigh*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Of course DRM adds value
Of course DRM has some kind of benefit - it adds value for the copyright holder and creates more professionally produced content for us. Any fool can see that!
The value is that it allows the copyright holders to monetize their new (and old content alike) in any way they seem fit (pay per play music is especially good). In turn, it encourages them to put out more and more of the same product, so that we get more content and they make pots of money, as they should. :)
It's those fukking hackers who keep breaking DRM that are the real culprits. Bastards. They should all be rounded up, locked up in jail and the key thrown away.
Any reasonable person will agree with me. I rest my case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Of course DRM adds value
By all means make it illegal and punishable, but adding hidden features that remove my ability to use the content that I have legitimately purchased should be criminal as well.
Pay per Play music is especially bad. Movies, I could understand, as they are a media item that you generally only need to see once. Music is something that any reasonable person will listen to many times once they purchase it. Trying to keep charging them again and again for the privilege is ridiculous.
Its fukking bitchers like you who support these ridiculous idea who are ruinig things for the rest of us. Bastards, you should all be rounded up and thrown in a prison cell with a dvd player and a disc it wont play.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I ain't gay but Nate sucks
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Of course DRM adds value
I am serious and you're not reasonable. Sorry.
I'm glad you can see the benefit of pay per play music to ultimately monetize Product - it's certainly *not* ridiculous, I promise you. Remember, the only thing that matters is making the copyright holders (who are usually *not* the creators) as much money as possible in any way possible. It really doesn't matter how.
Oh and it's "fucking" not "fukking".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hoooey.
Apple still practices device lock-in through their store, software client, players, and choice of format (AAC).
Their dropping of DRM is just posturing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just a reminder...
Your comment seems to suggest that removing DRM is the cause of the increased price, rather than the studios' attitudes. I'm not sure if that was your intended argument or not, but I disagree.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]