Cash4Gold Apparently Threatening Bloggers With Defamation
from the that'll-work dept
Despite getting plenty of attention for its Superbowl ad that felt more like a late-night-TV cable ad, Cash4Gold hasn't really been having a very good month. The company was caught when a representative (the company claims he was "acting independently") offered cash to a blogger if he would take down a negative review. Then some sites, including Consumerist republished a list of "10 confessions" from a former employee, who described what appears to be somewhat questionable practices by the company -- allowing it to live up to the letter of what it promises people, but not quite the spirit. The company, not surprisingly, denies all of this, and says you can't trust a disgruntled former employee.However, now it appears to be accusing folks who reposted even part of the Consumerist post with defamation. Allen Harkleroad writes in to let us know that after he wrote about the Consumerist article -- basically linking to Consumerist and including just the opening paragraph of the original article, the company had its PR firm threaten him with defamation. You know that's going to backfire.
What's especially odd about this, however, is that on the company's own blog they have reposted the same content in an attempt to refute it. That is the best way to respond to it. Threatening defamation charges is only going to serve to draw more negative attention to the company. Why wouldn't the PR people direct bloggers to the company's response instead?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blogging, defamation
Companies: cash4gold
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
IANAL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spelling fail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Spelling fail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Spelling fail
Let me try
Then some sights, including Consumerist republished a list of "10 confessions" ...
The company, not surprisingly, denys all of this, and says you can't trust a disgruntled former employee.
Do I win?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think these days, people see defamation as just bad form. If it isn't true, I think that generally most of the public will realize that and there is really no need for a defamation lawsuit. I think defamation made a lot of sense when publishing rights were held by a few and those sources were trusted as fact, but today I think most people have an ounce of skepticism when they read something on the net. I think it is possibly time to rethink the utility of defamation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
payment to bloggers
paying off a blogger is a means to an end for some companies who dont offer quality, but just because they pay to remove the article doesnt mean its not being linked/quoted on another blog...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who to trust?
Jesse says:
I think it is possibly time to rethink the utility of defamation.
Really. Given the Streisand effect, a company (or person) that hasn't actually done anything wrong ought to be thrilled to be handed a public forum to promote themselves in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah you Win
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just how much old gold do people have laying around anyway?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What was said:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scam detailed
The whole scam is detailed by that guy here http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/cash-4-gold-c115287.html. There's a lot of people that were taken in by this "service" that posted complaints on that site. I'm surprised networks would even agree to run their commercials.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cash4Gold Sues?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/09-03-2009/00050882 59&EDATE=
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/cash4gold-provides-cash-for-the,948814.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/09-03-2009/00 05088259&EDATE=
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/cash4gold-provides-cash-for-the,948814.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/cash4gold-provides-cash-for-the,948814.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cash for gold
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gold Stash for Cash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gold coin
gold coins
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gold coin
gold coins
[ link to this | view in chronology ]