Can Technology Solve The Privacy Questions Around Behavioral Advertising?
from the beats-regulations dept
Jim Harper makes a really good point as there's a growing clamor for regulators to step in and legislate around online privacy concerning things like behavioral targeting of advertisements. Before we rush into new laws, let's see if technology can solve the problems, such as Chris Soghoian's new tool to let users add a browser extension that let's them block out all targeted advertising cookies. That doesn't necessarily solve the issue with ISPs selling clickstream tracking, but it does suggest that technology may do a decent job protecting against some of these issues.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: behavioral ads, opt-out, regulation, technology
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
no
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: no
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laws
They keep me in the $$$
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's amazing what data can be gleaned, and attempting to block it all might end up making your web surfing experience rather lame (say by disabling java, flash, and so on).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
- You meant suppressed ?
... and if a site requires the use of javascript (notjava), flash or other such nonsense then maybe I do not need what they are providing. I hate that crap - and it is not needed in order to provide a good layout. It is needed in order to track your actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/maasx003/Vikings/images/unknown_comic.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the fence
Is facebook showing me ads relevant to my interests really that much different from Google showing me ads relevant to what I just searched for?
Isn't it just that Google has been doing its thing for a while in the background so we take it for granted, while this sort of advertising has come along in a world paranoid about privacy?
I keep hearing rumours about the advertising bubble thats coming. We all know how useless banner ads are. Why does no one want to admit that online marketing needs to become more efficient if its going to support what we already enjoy for free along with future growth?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On the fence
"
Dont have to. In time, it will do the work for its self and you will be convinced. Not unsimilar to the early days of telemarketing - What's wrong with someone calling me every now and then?
Why do you need to be convinced anyway? Like you are going to do anything about it. It will happen and you will not like it.
There are two parts to this beast, the tracking and the spamming. There is not much that you can do about the tracking part (isn't stalking illegal? certainly wiretapping is, right?). The spamming part can be stopped and there is more than one benefit from doing so. Not only do you not have to see their stupid flashy crap, but you also reduce your BW. BW caps are coming and it will be like overdraft fees at the bank, they will find ways to trip you up because there is money to be made. Your cell phone is also going to become a tool they will use.
That's not so bad you say ... I may like ads for stuff I want. Ok, but what if the ad is from Nigeria? These vectors into your life/pocket/credit will be abused, not by all but all it takes is one. It could become so bad that your cell phone is no longer useful - sort of like your email and landline are today, almost useless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: On the fence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: On the fence
Targetted Adverts: Mass email which targets almost everybody.
You're right, they are different!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]