Guardian Asks UK Gov't To Investigate Google News For Not Contributing To Journalism?

from the wrong-target dept

Tue, Mar 31st 2009 3:29pm — Mike Masnick

It had seemed like perhaps The Guardian newspaper in the UK understood how the internet worked. After all, execs there had been saying that they hoped the NYTimes would start charging, since it would just drive a lot more traffic their way. However, it seems like not everyone at The Guardian is on the same page. Similar to Feargal Sharkey's call demand that the UK government investigate Google for not giving the recording industry money, The Guardian is now asking the UK government to investigate Google over its Google News product, specifically claiming that Google gets too much benefit from its content. Of course, there's a simple solution to this: take your news off of Google News (or take it offline altogether). But The Guardian doesn't want to do that.

The reasoning is a bit convoluted, but, basically The Guardian says that since the online ad market is tough right now, it can't make enough money on the traffic that Google sends it. So stop accepting traffic from Google, right? No, it can't do that, because then competitors like the BBC would sweep up all of the traffic.

Is it just me, or does this reasoning suggest that The Guardian should be asking the government not to investigate Google News, but the BBC for representing unfair competition? The Guardian's reasoning here is a bit tortured. It seems to be saying it can't compete with other sources due to Google News... even though those other sources have the exact same issue (getting traffic from Google News). It's only real complaint is that the BBC offers its content for free online -- and (though it doesn't appear to explicitly call this out), the BBC is publicly funded and doesn't have to focus on ad revenue like The Guardian does. So why isn't the complaint against the BBC instead of Google News?

The Guardian always struck me as a pretty good paper, but the logic here is hard to understand. If it doesn't want the traffic, fine, don't take it (though, most people recognize that would be a mistake). If the problem is that it can't monetize the content effectively, then that's a business model problem for The Guardian -- not Google News. Finally, if the problem is (as it appears) competition from the BBC, then take it up with the BBC or those who fund it, but don't misplace the blame on Google News.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: competition, google news, journalism
Companies: bbc, google, guardian

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Weird Harold's former #5 fan, 31 Mar 2009 @ 4:24pm

1. Take the following and place into a file called robots.txt:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /

2. Put this file in the root directory of your web server.

3. Profit!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
robin oakley, 31 Mar 2009 @ 4:43pm

complaint about google news
If you can't compete get out of the market. The new age is free and internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2009 @ 4:57pm

not to sure on robot.txt file language, what would those lines do?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Simon, 31 Mar 2009 @ 6:08pm
  
  Re:
  Tells well behaved web crawlers (such as Google's) that nothing on the web server should be indexed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 31 Mar 2009 @ 5:11pm

I don't understand
why you think the BBC is in the wrong here? Just because they're more efficient?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 31 Mar 2009 @ 5:22pm
  
  Re: I don't understand
  why you think the BBC is in the wrong here? Just because they're more efficient?
  
  I don't think that at all. But that appears to be what the Guardian's complaint is saying...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - minijedimaster, 31 Mar 2009 @ 6:00pm
    
    Re: Re: I don't understand
    It seems to me that it would be unfair that a for profit business has to compete with a government funded competitor. Either way, their arguement is with the UK government, not Google.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul, 31 Mar 2009 @ 5:18pm

Disallow access to root (and all subfolders) from all useragents (*).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2009 @ 5:20pm

The real profit would be to write a search engine that only returns the blocked sites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joseph Young, 31 Mar 2009 @ 5:30pm

Compete!
Maybe I’m odd, but I use Google News only very rarely. However, I do regularly visit a number of other sites with various mixtures of aggregation versus editorial, for example, Techdirt. Those sites match up with my areas of interest. Why doesn't The Guardian go into the news aggregation business? Techdirt is a mixture of aggregation, analysis and opinion. The Guardian has analysis and opinion. Surely they can manage aggregation as well. They’ve got microsites, such as liberty central. They should turn them into pages that the target audience will want to visit on a daily basis, as a jumping off point not just for Guardian editorial but for that of other news providers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2009 @ 5:49pm

Is the BBC funded by the govmnt?
What about the Guardian?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
brock lesner, 9 May 2009 @ 12:04pm

hello buddy i read your comment it's great i learn alot of things from your comment ============================ Brock lesner ================ real estate-real estate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]