Great Moments In AP Protectionism: Demands Takedown Of Videos It Purposely Shared With Affiliate

from the brilliant-work dept

A bunch of folks are submitting the latest and greatest in the Associated Press's attempt to become the RIAA of news. The AP, smartly, has a YouTube channel, where it puts up a bunch of AP videos, with the embed code enabled. An AP affiliate in Tennessee reasonably embedded some of those videos... and were promptly accused of "stealing" the AP's licensed content and ordered to take it down. There are so many things wrong with this situation it's difficult to know where to start:
  • It's the AP's own YouTube channel.
  • This radio station is an AP affiliate.
  • The AP turned on the embedding function
  • When told all of this, the AP exec demanding the takedown had no idea it had a YouTube channel.
This is clearly part the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing... but it's also a sign of how out of touch the AP remains. When it purposely offers up content for sharing, it did something smart. Demanding that anyone take down content that was specifically designed to be shared in this manner is just amazing.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, embedding, protectionism, takedowns, videos
Companies: associated press


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Weird Harolds #2 Fan, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:36am

    Theft

    Sharing is stealing!!

    You wouldn't stab your grandmother; so why would you steal news?!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      sehlat (profile), 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:58am

      Re: Theft

      And corporate bullying is corporate bullying. If the AP beat up your grandmother, wouldn't you be just a tad annoyed?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:04am

      Re: Theft

      "You wouldn't stab your grandmother; so why would you steal news?!"


      "You wouldn't stab your grandmother?" is my new motto - I want it on a T-Shirt with the RIAA logo on the back hehe

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    lulz, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:39am

    Some organizations are just very finicky about distribution. What does it matter if it's embedded? People are getting their content out there.
    Pfft, idiots.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:45am

    Obligitory AP bashing...

    AP now means "Asshat Posse".

    Lets hear yours.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Chronno S. Trigger, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:53am

      Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

      AP = Ascending Psychosis

      I know it's irrelevant to the article, but I like using big words (even if I don't know how to spell them).

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        dredeyedick, 9 Apr 2009 @ 9:50pm

        Re: Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

        Apoplectic Pratts!

        Aggravating Putzes!

        Arrogant Printers performing Asynchronous Perambulations!

        Yes, they hyperventilated when Rupert said "That's got to stop." Then they pestered an affiliate (Affiliate Pesterers!) thereby revealing how fitfully they do a drunkard's walk towards a new business model - that failed 10 years ago.

        Always Privileged!

        (i've been looking at this story in too many places for too long... forgive me ;) )

        -dcm

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Leigh (profile), 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:53am

      Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

      How about AP is in their Attorneys' Pockets

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:06am

      Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

      how about AP = Alienating People?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:22am

      Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

      Assmunching Prostitutes.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Shawn, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:27am

        Re: Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

        AP = Anti-Freedom Plutocrats


        - wow im bored - could do this all afternoon LOL

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Azrael, 10 Apr 2009 @ 12:52am

      Re: Obligitory AP bashing...

      Anal Parasites - i think it pretty much sums them up.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Zaven, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:52am

    Ambiguous Possum

    They're not sure whether to play dead or sue the crap out of everyone in site.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Weird Harold, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:54am

    Just because one part of the AP provides a service, doesn't mean another part doesn't have the right to enforce their copyright. Case in point, Coke Zero. The original Coke has an ongoing lawsuit against Coke Zero as shown in those commercials...I don't really see how anybody can think this is a bad idea. Capitalist Mike seems to have a love affair with competition and consumer choice and all that capitalist crap, so he should love this!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Zaven, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:56am

      Re:

      Coulda sworn the coke vs coke zero thing was a joke.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      GeneralEmergency (profile), 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:01am

      Well, this makes it pretty clear now...

      Weird Harold(TM)(C)(Patent Pending) must be AP's lead counsel.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:08am

      Re:

      "The original Coke has an ongoing lawsuit against Coke Zero"

      This is called advertising.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Michael Ennis, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:17am

      Re:

      Close, but the big difference here is that Coke's lawsuit against Coke Zero is a marketing ploy to convince us, the teeming masses, that the flavor is the same (they are suing for 'taste infringement') unlike AP whom I believe would actually pursue a real lawsuit if the videos remained up on the site in question.

      Links to Coke's faux lawsuit videos found here:

      http://www.cpbgroup.com/awards/cokevscokezero.html

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      B, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:44am

      Re:

      I love how if anyone but WH had made that post everyone would have easily picked up on the sarcasm and moved on with their day.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:57am

        Re: Re:

        I love how if anyone but WH had made that post everyone would have easily picked up on the sarcasm and moved on with their day.

        If it were anyone else, you would assume that the person wasn't so obtuse as to really believe that Coke was suing itself.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Geoffrey Kidd (profile), 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:57am

    Stupidity is more abundant than hydrogen.

    See article above for proof.

    LOL

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Weird Harold, 9 Apr 2009 @ 10:59am

    Funny, impersonating me is so hilarious. But I digress. I think its completely reasonable that executives of companies have as little to do with operations of their company as possible, like the AP. This way they can concentrate on spending money on elephant leather chairs , and learning how to use a blackberry.

    Its a matter of fact that executives are always right , and everyone else is,by subtraction, wrong.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Shawn, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:10am

      Re:

      "Its a matter of fact that executives are always right , and everyone else is,by subtraction, wrong."

      I hate to agree with Harry Strange, but judging by where society puts it resources (in terms of the compensation the recieve in a dollars sense) we pretty much all seem to agree with him on this at least.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      John Doe, 9 Apr 2009 @ 11:12am

      Re:

      For once I agree with WH. The top execs are too busy stuffing bags full of money they can't be bothered to actually manage a company. Much like our politicians.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2009 @ 12:13pm

      Re:

      Which one is the real Weird Harold! We better shoot both of them to make sure!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    SpinLock, 9 Apr 2009 @ 1:14pm

    AP - You can't spell CHEAP without AP!

    The AP is incorporated as a Not For Profit company under U.S. law. Their current trajectory will likely ensure they live up to their incorporation status.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    RR23, 9 Apr 2009 @ 1:41pm

    re:

    I love the AP more and more every day!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jeff, 9 Apr 2009 @ 1:51pm

    Dinosaurus AP

    This is a clear cut case of an old conglomerate trying to do the Web 2.0 thing, but then greed overtakes common sense. Both Google News and Youtube should cut them off dry. Who needs the AP anyways.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gabriel, 9 Apr 2009 @ 3:31pm

    http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/08/ap-exec-doesnt-know-it-has-a-youtube-channel-threatens-affiliat e-for-embedding-videos/#comment-2690486

    Not only was this AP exec unaware of the fact that the AP has a YouTube channel, but their channel is evidently among the top viewed in the reporters category, and has thousands of videos posted.

    You'd think with a presence that significant on YouTube, the AP's executives would, you know, be aware of it...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dan, 10 Apr 2009 @ 12:35am

    AP

    The new SCO. Everyone needs a goal.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    VRP, 11 Apr 2009 @ 1:12pm

    Degree decorated morons

    Any wonder the world is laughing at those dumb americans?

    VRP

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.