Canadian Insurance Company Snooped On Jurors Insurance Claims During Trial
from the that-seems-bad dept
We've seen it over and over again -- when people have access to large databases of information, it's almost impossible for them to resist the temptation to abuse the info. The latest example comes via Michael Scott, who points us to the news that the Insurance Corporation of B.C. (ICBC) was caught checking its own database to examine the claim histories of potential jurors in a trial in which the company was involved. Not surprisingly, this is a massive breach of Canadian privacy laws and also raises questions about the jury itself. The judge in the case is now trying to find out if ICBC has done this in other cases as well. ICBC seems to be bending over backwards to say this won't happen again and that it's put in place safeguards, but it's not clear why it happened in the first place.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, insurance, jury, snooping
Companies: icbc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Business As Usual
2) Why is the privacy of the employee who performed the access more important than that of the victims ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Surprise...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blackberries in the courtroom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blackberries in the courtroom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ICBC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I know how to stop this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Really, it's not clear to you? It's pretty clear to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael Scott
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]