Insurance Company Sues Website Offering Claim Advice... Saying It's Infringing
from the entitlement-culture dept
Yet another example of "entitlement culture," as companies misuse intellectual property law to try to prop up questionable business models, comes in this latest story, sent in by Jesse. An insurance company in British Columbia, Canada, called ICBC, is suing a website that offers advice on how not to get your insurance claim denied. Obviously, for policy holders, this is useful information. But, to ICBC, it's copyright infringement. Well, at least that's what the article linked above says. I have a hard time seeing how there's a copyright claim here -- especially since the ICBC spokesperson states that they don't have a problem with the content, and that they just have to protect their trademark. So... let's give ICBC the benefit of the doubt and assume the newspaper reporter screwed up, and this is actually a trademark claim rather than a copyright claim (professional reporters for the win, again!). Even so, this would seem like a typical "gripes site" type discussion where, as long as it's clear that the site in question is not run by the company, there shouldn't be any problem. In fact, given that the site provides useful information for ICBC customers, it's difficult to see what the problem is, other than that the insurance company doesn't like its policy holders to learn how to stand up for their rights.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: gripes site, infringement, insurance, trademark
Companies: icbc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
entitlemnt or greed?
entitlement isn't a deadly sin, greed is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: entitlemnt or greed?
It's the sense of entitlement that no one is allowed to have any rights to express themselves if the companies don't like it that I find much more troubling than any sense of greed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: entitlemnt or greed?
I guess greed is the basis of the "entitlement culture", huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: entitlemnt or greed?
See the Wikipedia page for ICBC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Provincial Monopoly
It changes the impact of the claims system, since customers don't really have the choice of dealing with another insurer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quite Simple, Really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While I'd normally agree anyway, using the domain "icbcadvice.com" certainly does imply that they represent ICBC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks ICBC!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks ICBC!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Infringement?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am not a lawyer and all this is just IMHO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Michael Kirkland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Michael Kirkland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
copyright vs trademark vs patent
Ultimately, there's no incentive for the site to link to the original source (a copy of the complaint).
* they'd get a lower pagerank
* people would call them out on their bullshit reporting
* they'd be giving up their source
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Michael Kirkland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]