EFF Launches Copyright Curriculum To Counter RIAA Propaganda Being Handed Out To Schools
from the good-news dept
It's been quite troubling that for years various schools have simply accepted propaganda and totally inaccurate "teaching materials" about copyright and used them to teach students. These programs have been created by both the RIAA and the MPAA, at times. More recently, a lobbying organization backed by both of those organizations, the Copyright Alliance (which has a long history of making up the most fantastic myths about copyright) has been pushing a copyright curriculum on schools. Tragically, unsuspecting schools have been using the pure propaganda put out by the Copyright Alliance as if it were some sort of impartial and accurate educational material on copyright. It's not. Not even close. Last year, one of the world's foremost experts in copyright, William Patry, took the Copyright Alliance's founder to task for having "chutzpah in abundance" in basically making up what copyright and fair use is about, and presenting himself as some sort of expert on the subject.Unfortunately, schools that are using these materials often don't realize that they're simply accepting corporate propaganda, assuming that a front group like The Copyright Alliance is some sort of impartial player in the space, even though its curriculum is laughably bad, positioning any kind of copying as a high risk activity that should be avoided. Luckily, the EFF has finally launched a much more accurate and reasonable curriculum that was actually created by those who know the subject matter, rather than corporate execs and lobbyists. The EFF's curriculum is available at Teaching Copyright and is under a Creative Commons license. Unlike many of the propaganda copyright curricula, Teaching Copyright focuses on the broader picture, recognizing the fact that copyright is not for protecting creators, but is a deal between creators and the public to encourage creation within certain important limitations. It covers important concepts such as the public domain and fair use that are either ignored or downplayed in most of the curricula put out by the industry. This is a welcome addition to materials for schools to use to educate students on copyright.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright alliance, curriculum, education, eff, fair use, propaganda, public domain
Companies: eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Propaganda
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Propaganda
Uh...really? When HAVEN'T they been? If I had gone to school, sat down in a history class, NOT been forced to say the Pledge of Allegiance (how creepy is that shit, btw?), and gotten an impartial history lesson on ANY aspect of America I'd probably have shat myself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Propaganda
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
EFF seems to be living in a dream world. It makes good points. But making good points and keeping the attention of students are in large part mutually exclusive.
I give this round to the labels, who in fact makes their points in a much more contemporary manner. Not only that, but those who criticize their material saying it is propoganda and plainly wrong in many significant respects are themselves operating with a lack of understanding of the points being presented in the material.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Propaganda
–noun
1. information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.
2. the deliberate spreading of such information, rumors, etc.
3. the particular doctrines or principles propagated by an organization or movement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Once you have done this, then perhaps you may wish to reconsider the tenor and substantive content of your post.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Wow, are you ever out of touch with reality. I sumbit that the "class" of children you describe are positioned on a Bell Curve somewhere in the vicinity of at the very least 6 sigma from the norm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Care to elaborate on what you believe is "plainly wrong" and why rather than just lobbing ambiguous potshots? Otherwise your statement above is the logical equivalent of "oh huh!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Spoken like a true "and back in my day... hey, kids! get off my lawn!" sort of person.
Rather than learning about kids from what you read in the news, you might want to try actually getting to know some. Kids are a lot smarter than you give them credit for. But, then again, since you've said in the past that kids today are immoral creatures, it's of little surprise that you don't seem to know much about kids today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Then again, what does a "back in my day" individual know? Perhaps the fact this is an issue of concern at the high school where my wife teaches...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Funny, actually, I was just in a high school classroom this week. And you know what? I gave a presentation that was fun and interesting and got the kids interested.
Then again, what does a "back in my day" individual know? Perhaps the fact this is an issue of concern at the high school where my wife teaches...
Perhaps it's not the kids that are the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misquote needs fixing
"using the pure propaganda put out by the Copyright Alliance"
above all in blue and linked
the above quoted link is to article that clearly says "pro-copyright" and not "pure" as you link above. Also in their article they never say pure, only pro.
You might consider fixing (probably unintentional) misquote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Misquote needs fixing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Misquote needs fixing
Its one thing to be pro-copyright. Its quite another to think any of the clout in the Copyright Alliance's curriculum is accurate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Misquote needs fixing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Misquote needs fixing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Misquote needs fixing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
anybody have docs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In case you missed it, the words "Teaching Copyright" are hyperlinked to:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am not at all sure what this means, but you damn well better not be talking about my wife.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dude....your wife's totally gay...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Well, not totally...
OK, I'm done picking the low-hanging fruit... Sorry 'bout that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pretense of objectivity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pretense of objectivity
Heh. If you knew anything about Patry you'd realize what an incredibly laughable charge that is. Patry has a long and extremely distinguished record as a copyright expert. He literally wrote "the book" on copyright. Charging with him bias is flat out silly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pretense of objectivity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My comment was directed solely to Masnick based upon an ambiguous post that could reasonably be viewed as potentially derisive. He had the good sense to drop the matter, something it appears that each of you lack.
Want to pick on someone and make disparaging remarks? Pick on me, but leave my family out of it. Kapish?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
....you're whole family is gay, and of ugly stock. Now go away, ninny-headed pigdog, or I shall taunt you a second time.
Plus, if you're going to try to sound tough/cool/whatever by using Italian words, let's try to spell them correctly. Sound good there, Skeeter?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
A benefit of the internet is that such people can easily be traced with but a few keystrokes. Things like names, home addresses, work addresses, telephone numbers, photos, personal profiles, friends and family are readily at hand and ripe for the picking. The "veil" of anonymity is indeed very thin.
I never cease to be amazed that in the "linked world" of today people proceed in apparent blissful ignorance that their words can come back to haunt them in ways that only a few short years ago were unimaginable.
You would be very well advised, "tgeigs", to keep this at the forefront of your mind.
Michael L. Slonecker
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
This is rich from someone who almost always posts anonymously, and has a long history of insulting not just me, but all sorts of people, branding all children as being immoral brats.
You would be very well advised, "tgeigs", to keep this at the forefront of your mind.
Michael, are you threatening commenters on this site?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
As for Mr. "tgeigs", he and others of similar bent should take to heart that "words can come back to haunt you". It is a valuable lesson that is best learned early, and not late, in life as it will serve them in good stead personally and professionally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, they can't. They're words. A word only has the power that you or I give it. Choosing to take insult at something that Mike said earlier, that maybe it isn't the kids in your wife's school that's the problem, is playing the victim, and I was trying to prove a point, albeit in a combative, juvenile way. I want people to stop giving "bad" words power by reacting to them. For instance, I don't happen to believe the word "gay" is bad, but you reacted negatively when I said you were gay. I think that reveals more about you than me, but again, it was a juvenile attempt to draw a valid point.
"It is a valuable lesson that is best learned early, and not late, in life as it will serve them in good stead personally and professionally."
Correct, unless we choose to stop giving words power by choosing to be offended by them. I thought I was being so over the top as to be laughable and humorous. Apparently I was wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]