Tricking People With Fake Content Isn't Good Advertising
from the that's-sleazy dept
One of the things that gets people upset when we talk about advertising being content, and content being advertising is that they think this means advertisers tricking users into viewing their ads. That's not true at all. It should be totally upfront. People who pass along a cool commercial are doing it because they know exactly what it's advertising and they know that it's still cool. The idea is to create content that's so good that even though everyone knows it's advertising, they don't mind. If you have to "trick" people into viewing your ad, then it's bad content.Witness, for example, this story from Wired, about a company advertising a "work from home" scheme. To advertise it, they built a series of fake news sites that look incredibly realistic -- just look at this example from a site called News5Alert or The Miami Gazette News, that look an awful lot like real news sites. As Karl notes, they even show that the "comments are closed due to spam."
But the whole thing is fake. It's really an ad. And, to make it worse, the company behind it is taking out ads on real news sites and trying to make it look like news -- thereby tricking people into reading their ad. The whole scam is to get people to sign up for info on how to make money from home -- for which they're charged $2... but then suddenly many claim they started finding additional "surprise" charges on their credit card, which the company says they actually agreed to in the fine print. That's an old scam, but using real-looking news articles is the new twist. So, while content is advertising, misleading or sneaky advertising is bad content.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, advertising is content, content is advertising, fake content, fake news
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
content is advertising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
News 5 Altert is Mysteriously Gone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And as a consumer of "entertainment product", I should just butch up and pretend that I don't love it when they...
Um, what was the question again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
LOL!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Similar Example
http://www.directtrafficmedia.co.uk/News/Habitat_Make_a_Hash_of_Iran_on_Twitter_9 62331057184.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Similar Example
Someone needs to call the Waaaaambulance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...Hidden message
This publication is an article advertisement for Easy Google Profit
lol.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about Responsibility?
If companies are not willing to exhibit some degree of self-control, I would have no aversion to the "evil" regulators stepping in and fining companies that pursue/allow misleading advertising.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about Responsibility?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's a complete sham and they seem to be rotating sites. This is highly suspect if you click any of the links or read the fine print, but they are hoping you don't notice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tricking People With Fake Content Isn't Good Advertising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How many people do you think get tricked by that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]