Criminal Prosecution For Domain Hijacking
from the with-a-bizarre-twist dept
There have been tons of stories over the years of domain names being hijacked. The famous Sex.com saga goes back more than a decade, and involves accusations of a "stolen" domain. However, as a bunch of folks have sent in, for what appears to be the first time, someone has been arrested and criminally charged in such a situation (usually the disputes are handled through civil suits or arbitrators). In this case, it did, in fact, start as a civil suit, back in 2007 (attempts at the time to get police involved went nowhere). However, as new evidence came to light, criminal charges were just recently added, as well. The article linked above is chock full of detailed info on the case, including a good explanation of why these disputes almost never involve criminal charges. Oh, and as an odd side note, apparently the guy who "purchased" the domain from the guy who allegedly hijacked it, is professional NBA basketball player, Mark Madsen, who, when not playing center for the LA Clippers, has a side hobby of domain name speculation. Who knew?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: criminal, domain hijacking, mark madsen, p2p.com
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Intellectual vs Physical Property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Intellectual vs Physical Property
First, I was more concerned with the details of the case... but, actually, when it comes to a domain name, I'd argue that it is much more like real property in that it IS rivalrous and exclusive. Only one person can control a domain name at a time, so it's not at all like Intellectual Property. A domain name is a scarce good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Intellectual vs Physical Property
Seems to me like it is an example of something that is both an intellectual property and a scarce good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Intellectual vs Physical Property
Hmm? How is a domain name intellectual property? I don't see how it fits into any such definition. The reason a domain name is scarce has nothing to do with "intellectual property." It has to do with the simple fact that it's rivalrous and excludable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Intellectual vs Physical Property
It is an intellectual property because it is non-physical and exists only as an intellectual construct.
The reason a domain name is scarce has nothing to do with "intellectual property."
Agreed. Didn't mean to imply that it did.
It has to do with the simple fact that it's rivalrous and excludable.
Agreed, again. However, that does not prevent it from also being intellectual. The two do not have to be mutually exclusive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Intellectual vs Physical Property
If someone makes a copy of an album, the copyright owner only suffered an injury to his exclusionary right. But if someone steals your ipod, your suffering injury to both your exclusionary right and your possessory right. IP doesn't have a possessory right so it cannot be "stolen." There are a number of judges and legal scholars who have said the same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wrong charge?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Domain Name as Intellectual Property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Domain Name as IP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]