The Death Of Paid WiFi
from the it's-over,-done-with,-kaput dept
It's been almost exactly six years since I got into a bit of a debate about whether or not there was a real business model for fee-based WiFi. Not surprisingly, I didn't think it would last, even as there were a bunch of startups (some well-funded) trying to stake out a claim that they could build huge networks of paid WiFi access points. Those businesses never got very far. While there are still some fee-based WiFi access points around (mainly in airports), more and more are becoming totally free. Starbucks (which had been a holdout) has gone conditionally free, and last week Barnes & Noble WiFi went totally free. So can we now close the book on the idea that fee-based WiFi was ever a good business model?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fee, free, wifi
Companies: barnes & noble
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yup. That's the one place it sorta still exists... but even that's been seen less and less. And, in fact, in the earlier debates I pointed out that was the one tiny market it might work, because you could limit competition. Though, even that is coming under pressure as well, as there's starting to be some competition coming from the airport, the airlines and other private vendors.
Oh yeah, and I'm seeing more and more airports with free WiFi. When I was in Toronto, it had fre WiFi in some places. The JetBlue terminal at JFK has free WiFi. I got free WiFi recently at the airport in Denver. Lots of others do still charge, but it's a pretty niche market. The debates years ago weren't about airports, though. They were about paid WiFi in shops and stores in your local downtown. And that's dead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I also have seen more and more "multiple system" wifi setups, where accounts on most of the major carriers for 3G also gives you wifi in the building.
I think what you are likely to see more and more of is "sponsored" wifi, where they say it's $10, but just come to the counter and it's free. Something along those lines, because people still value wifi, and the intention for the business is to get people in the door.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Then you've got to worry about signal strength, the fact that anything but straight web browsing is generally blocked, etc.
What about data-limited free wifi - no more than so many megabytes per day/week/whatever from any given MAC address. Or free wifi, but you have to pay if you want to use a power socket...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
WiFi is such a small thing, but opens the door to so much. On many occasions, I ate at the restaurant that offered free WiFi, even if the price may have been higher/selection was less. I will never choose a place that sells WiFi over one that does not offer it; offer it for free and you pretty much have my business locked up already.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Airports work under a different economic model
Are you suggesting the price of food in airports is competitive?
When you are the only vendor or severely limit selection to only those approved, then you can charge what you want. Airports, Movie Theaters, University Bookstores, Sports stadiums all feel they have a captive audience and can charge more.
Hotels that signed long-term contracts for Wireless access are now locked into charging guest $10/day and scaring away business.
I still think WiFi is valuable and worth paying for in some instances. But businesses like Bookstore(B&N), Coffee shop(SBUX) and restaurants (MCD) use WiFi to increase their business, increase their traffic, drive customers to their door and then make money doing what they do best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Airports work under a different economic model
Are you suggesting the price of food in airports is competitive?"
Really??
He is suggesting nothing about food. Where did you get that idea?
However, since it is a captive audience, food would be expected to be more expensive. Competitive, yes, but only competitive with the other high rent retailers inside the airport.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Could still be a good business model
Being old enough to remember pay phones, I would say that there could be money made for WiFi that was priced similarly. You won't necessarily get rich, but you could get by if you did it right.
In my experience, however, WiFi was too costly and didn't fit the use cases that real people wanted. At a hotel and want to check email or surf the web for 30 minutes before bed? A hefty all-day fee won't cut it. Neither will a "more than a few cents per minute" plan either. Might as well go without, wait till you get home, look for a local library or pay the phone company their data fee for a month. Too many viable alternatives.
If, however, I were given the choice between unsecured free Wi-Fi vs a secured WPA connection for a small fee, I might consider the latter. Or I might just set up a VPN channel through a personal server. Depends on the price vs the hassle of doing it myself.
The other WiFi killer of course is the limited distance. Pay big dollars for a days worth of access and be tethered to the premises all day to get your money's worth. No thanks.
I think what killed WiFi was greed and overpricing, not the lack of a business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Could still be a good business model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Could still be a good business model
One point you're missing in the Techdirt argument is that the "correct" price point is elusive. You see, there are two cases to consider, free and fee.
Free Wi-Fi can be offered at "best effort" levels of service. The cost to provide a free Wi-Fi service is about a DSL line, plus a one-time investment in a $50 router, that's about $50 a month. If you are a coffee shop, you can probably make that up by selling a few venti lattes and a muffin. When the Wi-Fi doesn't work, you say "Sorry", and cycle power.
The cost of fee-based services spikes up, just as soon as you make it a service with a price greater than zero. Customers have higher expectations than free users. You now need: 1-800 phone number for support, guarantee of service, brochures and printed instructions, billing infrastructure, welcome pages, login pages, help pages, credit card processor partners and their fees, alternate methods of payment, stored value tracking databases, timing databases, back end authentication, authorization, and accounting. You need business people to manage the business, facilities, receptionists. It goes on and on. If you spread all these expenses out over an expected number of users and set a price that allows some profit, you get...about $10.
Thus, public Wi-Fi is something we've always considered "too cheap to bill". The cost of just providing the service is dwarfed by the cost of providing it as a business. Thus, it is economically inefficient to provide it as a business. If you do, and you are in a competitive environment, someone else will do it the efficient way and out-compete you on price.
You see, it wasn't "greed and overpricing". Prices of the businesses were driven by real costs. It IS a case of no feasible business model in charging for things that are too cheap to bill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey
I read a lot of stuff on here but starting a story with "OFMG ITS DEAD I TOLD YOU SUCKERS" and following it with "Its not really dead its just that some things have changed and/or we've made progress" is pretty poor taste in journalism.
Just saying. I might carry my laptop around now though if I dont have to keep buying Starbucks gift cards to get online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hey
Is writing things OFM* really worth going to hell for? It's up to you, but think about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hey
No joke. I suppose "knowing the mind of your god" is part of what religion is all about. And in the belief of many, such as most Christians, Jews and Muslims for example, such blasphemy is a grave sin. Some consider it unforgivable.
It just would be a shame for someone to commit such a sin knowing no better. If they know better but choose to do so anyway, then that's up to them. At least they were warned and knew what they were doing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wifi Doa?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And that right there's a clear cut case of a bad business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hotels
I was chatting with a manager at a $300/night hotel and asked him why they charged an extra $10 per day for wifi. He said that in the early days of WiFi they signed a 10-year contract with a provider. They were obligated to charge by the contract. The contract had recently expired at the time I talked to him, and he said they would drop it if they felt it was costing them business, but otherwise it is hard to give up a revenue stream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hotels
Crazy as it sounds, I could see Disney being one of the first big resorts to do free wifi.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But Paris, France seems to be lagging
And interestingly, the % of Parisians at coffee shops with their laptops was at least an order of magnitude lower vs. the US. Laptopping over coffee is just not part of the culture, which probably keeps demand for free Wi-Fi below the threshold of most business owners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But Paris, France seems to be lagging
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: McDonald's WiFi is now totally free in UK.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Airports that charge for wifi suck - but there's nothing you can do about it. You aren't going to make your flight decisions based on whether the airport has free wifi or not. :-(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's not be specious here
AT&T runs about 20,000 of them now, with all being for-fee except now the 700-odd that are B&N locations. There are notable free chains (Panera), and thousands of cafes that offer free service.
Nonetheless, the single biggest operator is a for-fee service. AT&T has made that sorta free by offering no-fee access to tens of millions of its landline and smartphone customers. But it's still oriented as an authenticated, paid network.
Business traveler venues are also still largely for-fee. Hotels, airports, convention centers. Hotels are starting to change, and some already tied free Internet access to affinity clubs that provide more loyalty.
The airport move, sorry to say, is pretty slow. Airports typically don't have the ability to forego millions in revenue and take on hundreds of thousands to millions in expense. Boingo Wireless has eaten the majority of North American airports, so we'll probably see defections in places where free Wi-Fi becomes an amenity to attract travelers, but why would an airport otherwise go free?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hong Kong
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Have you ever been in Europe, Mike?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
McDonald's WiFi
It just requires a name and email address to use, and those don't have to be real!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Death Of Paid WiFi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Airports
Honestly, I would be willing to pay in an airport if they had reasonable fees. If I want to check my email on my laptop during a 1 hour layover, I am not going to pay $10 or $20 for it. I'll go through the trouble of trying to peck out an email on my phone instead. But $2 or $3 would be reasonable to me.
I just don't see why things are priced the way they are, although I don't have data to back it up.. It would seem that they would actually make much more money by charging less. However, the popularity of smart phones and 3G will eventually kill paid wifi in airports.. I think
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free airport Wifi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Problen with paid wifi: how to pay for it?
* Credit card fees ($0.30 per transaction + 2% of amount) make it economically unfeasible to charge less than a dollar.
Moral of the story: no deal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My favorite response is tethering by Blackberry. I used to live off of my Sprint PCS card.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem isn't simply the fee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
paid WiFi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bandwidth
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Denver Airport Free But Slow...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]