And Of Course: Twitter Sued For Patent Infringement In Texas
from the where-else? dept
This should hardly be a surprise, but with Twitter being so popular lately, it was only a matter of time until it was targeted in patent infringement lawsuits. At the very least, the company suing them appears to (a) actually be based in Texas and (b) have a product on the market. But... that doesn't make TechRadium's lawsuit against Twitter any more reasonable or sensible. Take a look at the patents in question:- 7,130,389: Digital notification and response system
- 7,496,183: Method for providing digital notification
- 7,519,165: Method for providing digital notification and receiving responses
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alerts, notification, patents, texas, twitter
Companies: techradium, twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
***I trolled with angry dude!***
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
Not that you'd know, you probably don't even have a patent.
***I trolled angry dude!***
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
Go ahead... go quietly into the night.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
STFU!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
***I trolled with angry dude!***
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mikey is doing his regular patent-pissing routine
Fuck off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But seriously..
I saw nothing on *how* to implement, I only saw *what* to implement.
I'm probably missing something fundamental, so any insight would probably make my head stop hurting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But seriously..
For example, should you invent a cost-effective way of transmuting beans into titanium; you patent to process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But seriously..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But seriously..
Of course, if the patent examiners weren't also practically monster-corp lackeys, currently on the "inside" half of the revolving door system at the USPTO, maybe these patents wouldn't get granted in the first place. Most patents can be kept from being accepted on simple grounds like *prior art* and *obviousness*. As Mike and other comments have noted in this case, all three patents are ridiculously obvious, and have a long history of prior art, even if you discount the pagers that were so ubiquitous in the 1980's. Patent renewals max out at 25 years, so any pager patents should have expired by now. Any patents on things you could do with UNIX in the 70's should have expired in the last century.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But seriously..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is a difference though...
Namely, the plaintiff is an actual company with an actual product built around said patent, said plaintiff is a (real, not troll) company based in Texas, and Twitter could conceivably could be seen as a threat to its customer base.
While I'm not making any judgment about the viability of the patent, it would be useful to note the stark differences between this lawsuit and the ones you usually write about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There is a difference though...
Namely, the plaintiff is an actual company with an actual product built around said patent, said plaintiff is a (real, not troll) company based in Texas, and Twitter could conceivably could be seen as a threat to its customer base.
You say that as if I didn't say that in the post itself. But I did: "At the very least, the company suing them appears to (a) actually be based in Texas and (b) have a product on the market."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Business Model
A patent should be clear enough that someone in the field could duplicate the patent. The patent should also not be obvious as tested by a statical majority individuals in the field.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1. A digital notification and response system, comprising:
a. an administrator interface for preparing and transmitting a message from an administrator to at least one user contact device;
b. a dynamic information database for storing the message, wherein the dynamic information database comprises;
i. user contact data comprising:
1. user contact device information; and
2. user selected priority information that indicates a contact order for the user contact device;
ii. user selected grouping information comprising:
1. at least one group associated with each user contact device; and
2. a priority order for contacting each user contact device within the group;
iii. response data comprising:
1. user response information that indicates individual user contact devices have received the message; and
2. response information that indicates when insufficient user contact device information exists to contact the user contact devices;
wherein the administrator initiates distribution of the message using the grouping information, priority information, and the priority order, and wherein the message is transmitted through at least two industry standard gateways simultaneously, wherein the two industry standard gateways are selected from the group consisting of: a SMTP gateway a SIP, an H.323, an ISDN gateway, a PSTN gateway, a softswitch, and combinations thereof, wherein the message is received by the at least one user contact device, and the at least one user contact device transmits a response through the industry standard gateways to the dynamic information database.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wired has this too
They have my new favorite quote of all time. From Twitter documents released on TechCrunch, "We will be sued for patent infringement, repeatedly and often."
That really just says it all doesn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny Stuff ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny Stuff ....
So I guess what I'm saying is, these ideas are obvious to people even beyond those "skilled in the art". I'm pretty confident that many electricians or plumbers or city planners or what-have-yous with a rudimentary understanding of how computers work could come up with these solutions, even if they didn't know precisely how to implement them.
And here I was hoping that, as computer education improves, a basic understanding of programming concepts and the ability to write simple scripts would become more and more common knowledge. I guess that's prohibited... arg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
come to think of it...
And imagine if THOSE were patentable! (And if Pi was a registered trademark of Archimedecorp)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a shilling we will go
"Read through the claims on each of these patents and try not to gag on the obviousness of all three..."
Do you have any concept of what obviousness means? Of course you don't, yet you continue to rail away. So how much do Cisco
and the rest of the patent deform crowd pay you to write this trash?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow. Apparently, it's possible to patent the first thing you think of to try out your new skill after completing a tutorial. Programming is dangerous. I'm waiting for a patent on converting text files into executable code any time now...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]