Microsoft's Ad Agency Sued For Violating Product Placement Patent With Bing Ad
from the product-placement-patent?!?! dept
With the rise of the DVR and the death of the captive audience, it's no surprise that product placement has become more and more popular. But would you believe that ad agencies are trying to patent forms of product placement? Apparently, big ad firm WPP is being sued by a company for violating its patent in an ad campaign run for Microsoft's Bing search engine. The patent in question (6,859,936) is for "a method and system for producing program-integrated commercials." Basically, the idea is to use the actors and sets from a TV show to film a regular commercial spot, and then run that during the show itself. Yes, someone got a patent on that. Why? Who the hell knows. This is a perfect example, by the way, of how just because something's "new" it doesn't mean it's not obvious. It's just that it's so obvious most people wouldn't even bother thinking about patenting it.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bing, patents, product placement
Companies: microsoft, wpp
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Not even new!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even new!
Who the frak works at the Patent Office? Seriously?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even new!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even new!
But then the patent is for the insertion technology, not for the construct of integrating ads into shows.
Also, I think the construct related to the patent is the other way around: a clip from a show is integrated into a product ad.
But even this, I think, was art prior to 2005.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even new!
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even new!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not New
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks for buying Razorfish, WPP. Now, suck it.
Dell and HP have been added to my list of companies that I won't patronize.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks for buying Razorfish, WPP. Now, suck it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks for buying Razorfish, WPP. Now, suck it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thanks for buying Razorfish, WPP. Now, suck it.
Some of us use Linux, ya know!
Of course, if you read anything on RMS, he is like the broke Bill Gates in the bully department.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We'd all be blinded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Basically, we would stop being productive and spend our time gazing at our electronically enhanced navels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Oh, you're still at work. Well, keep dreaming. It'll give you something to look forward to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My favorite?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hell, I got to do something with 10GB of Ram...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hell it goes back to radio if not theater
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My patent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prior Art.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Uncle_Al_Show
They were pretty unabashed about the way they pushed junk food on children. See also, H. H. Munro ("Saki"), "Quail Seed," circa 1914
http://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-stories/UBooks/QuaiSeed.shtml
A description of a melodrama with advertising incorporated. I suppose it would be too much to expect that the patent office be populated by people of some education or culture.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So what's so new about this method? Granted, I have not read the patent, so maybe there is something special (like they got away with it.)
I am beginning to think that the patent examiners either do not read and EXAMINE the applications,or they are just finished with 8th grade and can read.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]