IBM Wants Patent On Conference Call Laugh Tracks
from the is-this-funny-to-you? dept
theodp writes "The first known use of a recorded laugh track is said to be in 1950, when the producers of the Hank McCune Show added canned laughter after the show's taping. Almost 60 years later, IBM says it deserves a patent for 'inventing' adding canned laughter to conference calls. 'A pre-selected stored sound (e.g., an interjection such as a laugh) may be generated if there is a period of silence on one of the telephone lines that exceeds a threshold,' explains Big Blue in its just-published patent application for Enlivening Conference Calls to Make Conference Calls More Interesting for Participants. Eureka!"Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: conference calls, laugh track, patents
Companies: ibm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What are they patenting?
The other question I have is about applicability. If the software is listening for silence, is it listening in on the conversation too?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This sounds like an automated version of a device I saw back in the early nineties. The device would plug into the phone, back when all phones were wired, and you could press a button and it would play a pre-recorded sound threw the phone line.
So, they are taking three devices and putting them together.
1) A device that starts a countdown on a non signal and will activate something when the countdown finishes unless a signal appears again. This is done in programing and electronics all the time. (a nand gate?)
2) A device that will play sounds threw the phone line. See the device I mentioned earlier or something like an on hold track.
3) A decibel meter. (If I have to explain that, I probably have to further explain the other two)
I can see that the only reason this hasn't been patented before, or at least no prior art, is because it's a stupid idea and would never be implemented in a professional environment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Such a unique idea
Thanks, IBM, for inventing something that was pretty common 25 years ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's prior art, you can't invent something, release it, and then ask for a patent years later.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Sample Conference Call
Silence.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A Sample Conference Call
Silence.
HAHAH*interrupted by sound of guns being loaded.
Regional Manager: OH SHIT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A million monkeys at a million typewriters
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A million monkeys at a million typewriters
This is another one of the patents my family has had for YEARS! Now if you don't mind, I'll be suing you for those margaritas & the private island... and for good measure the rest of your hopes & dreams as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
... and for good measure the rest of your hopes & dreams as well.
They have lots of lawyers all in very nice suits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ... and for good measure the rest of your hopes & dreams as well.
You see, a lawyer be an ninja's arch enemy.
Hence, the thousands of lawyers slain by my sword.
A ninja must do his part to rid the world of the vermin lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Silence
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another Sample Conference Call
"I, Johnathan E. Moneybags, being of sound mind and body, hearby bequeath my entire estate to my cherished pet chihuahua "stinky". I leave nothing to my ingrate children or my frigid wife." Any questions?
Silence.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Are we just patenting everything that crosses someone's mind, now? Just in case?
Silence
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My new patent
No comments within twenty minutes?
Insert:
Silence....
"HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: My new patent
Mike, that should take a couple minutes of scripting. You might want to patent the idea, though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That would annoy me to no end on a conf call, they are bad enough as it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dibs!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dibs!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Patent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Frankly, this application strikes me as little more than an attempt to secure a patent, not for business reasons, but for reasons having to do with the inventors getting a piece of paper with a nice ribbon for hanging on their ego walls and inclusion in their resumes/CVs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Alright, does anyone know who flooded the corporate basement today?"
Silence
(You get the Idea).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another way to belie reality?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Yet
The purpose of this is to demonstrate to the taxpayers that large American corporations retain their keen innovative edge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is their benefit from this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]