Nissan To Add Futuristic Sound Effects To Its Electric Car To Keep It From Hitting Unaware Pedestrians

from the so-that's-why-they-sound-that-way dept

Tue, Sep 22nd 2009 5:55am — Mike Masnick

Ever wonder why futuristic vehicles in science fiction movies have loud whirring/buzzing noises? Perhaps it's because of people worried about pedestrians getting hit by silent vehicles. You may recall that there has been some effort underway to push the makers of hybrid or electric vehicles to add engine noises to their cars, because the electric engines are "too quiet" and unsuspecting pedestrians who fail to look both ways are getting hit. Or so we're told. I've yet to see much actual evidence of the rash of pedestrians-hit-by-Priuses, but the story has gained some legs. In fact, some politicians are even pushing for government mandates to require such cars to be noisier. In an effort to live up to any such requirements, while still making its all electric vehicle still feel futuristic, apparently Nissan is looking to add those Blade Runner-style vehicle noises to the upcoming Nissan Leaf. There's no functional reason for it, other than that they want to make the car noisier, and fake engine noises didn't seem as fun (or, one would imagine, marketable).

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cars, nissan leaf, sounds
Companies: nissan

95 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:03am

deaf law makers
I've seen plenty of cars that had engines so quiet I heard the tires on the pavement before I heard the engine. I also hear my grandfathers Prius just fine.

And if you're in a situation where you won't hear the tires on the road, you probably won't hear the fake engine noise anyways. Best to look before you step out onto a street.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- zaven (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:38am
  
  Re: deaf law makers
  Um, the legislation is for the consideration of blind people. I don't think they can look before they cross the street.
  
  On another note, can we get tasers to make noise too when shot. I want to bring back the "pew" "pew" sounds effects from my childhood.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:14am
    
    Re: Re: deaf law makers
    That doesn't take into account the silent electric engines that are already out there, the quieter internal combustion engines that are out there, or the adaptations that the blind develop to compensate.
    
    It's one thing for Nissan to do this by themselves (it's their car, they can make it as unappealing as they choose), it would be another to create a law forcing this down everyone's throats. It would require a minimum decibel level and would have to take into account the current cars that fall under that level or the people who modify their cars to not emit that noise. And imagine the fun people will have trying to adjust their noise to find the brown note or mosquito noise.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Jim O (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:37am
      
      Re: Re: Re: deaf law makers
      My neighbors are blind and I find their mobility skills to be fascinating. They do prefer to cross streets at lighted intersections, but even at lighted intersections they mainly use car sounds to determine what direction traffic is flowing.
      
      If they come to a signal (or intersection) with light or no traffic they will wait and listen to determine which direction traffic is flowing to decide when to cross. If they hear nothing for a while they have no choice but to cross the street with no idea whether a car is coming. They do their best to stay out of cars' paths.
      
      I'm not saying that I think artificial car noises are a good idea, but I can understand how the thought of a majority of cars being noiseless is a scary thought for the blind.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - iNtrigued (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:18am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: deaf law makers
        I think the sound of the tires at a certain speed would make enough noise to still allow them to make that determination. Although like someone pointed out, at a low enough speed the noise would be significantly less. Maybe their could be a switch, similar to how you turn your lights or turn signal on, that could enable a sound while going through intersections.
        
        Its important to note that we won't be seeing a significant enough drop in noise producing cars to worry about this anytime soon, but it is worth looking into for the future. The gov't should definitely stay out of it though, I mean, when was the last time the gov't made something better? It starts off well enough, but it always ends with, "Well we didn't know it was going to do THAT."
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael Talpas (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:38am
    
    Re: deaf law makers
    If they are making these laws for the consideration of blind people, doesn't it seem strange to you that blind people are 'walking across streets without a guide?'
    
    At stop lights, they have been putting in those loud beeps that let the blind person know that it is safe to go across. Beyond that, blind people should not be walking across streets without a guide who will look both ways for them. Like, a seeing eye dog.
    
    The idea of mandating car noises for silent cars so that blind people walking across the street don't get hit is similar to the idea of putting braille on drive through atms so that blind people can use them while driving.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - RB, 22 Sep 2009 @ 1:04pm
      
      Re: Re: deaf law makers
      Braille is on drive-thru ATMs because the same models of ATMs are used in non-drive-thru locations as well.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 1:49pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: deaf law makers
        Braille is on drive-thru ATMs because the same models of ATMs are used in non-drive-thru locations as well.
        
        I've seen braille stickers added onto drive-through ATMs that did not originally have it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        John Duncan Yoyo (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 2:40pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: deaf law makers
        >>Braille is on drive-thru ATMs because the same
        >>models of ATMs are used in non-drive-thru locations as >>well.
        
        >I've seen braille stickers added onto
        >drive-through ATMs that did not originally have it.
        
        Don't any of you have a back seat? The braille is for a backseat passenger to be driven to the cash machine.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 3:08pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: deaf law makers
        The braille is for a backseat passenger to be driven to the cash machine.
        
        By the dog.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Headbhang (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:24am
  
  Re: deaf law makers
  If you read the actual article, you'll see that there is a sound rationale behind the system, which switches off automatically after the car reaches 12 mph, when the sound of the tires is deemed loud enough to serve as warning. While I regard this sound to be pretty useful, I'm of the opinion that engine noise is more of an annoyance than it is worth at high speeds.
  
  However, I dread the idea of an advent customizable "car-tones" for people to broadcast their "individuality" to unsuspecting bystanders. I'd rather have a lorry roaring at my side than some moron pumping some Jay-Z at me because he finds it cool. People need to keep their fucking music inside their cars, not outside.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:24am

Proprietary Noises
Can't wait for car maker A to sue car maker B for copying their trademarked fake engine noise. Or, even better, a musician suing a car maker for infringement for using their music as a fake engine noise (imagine getting paid a royalty for that use!).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Comboman (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:02am
  
  Re: Proprietary Noises
  Sounds like a new business model. For only $10 you can download a new EngineTone(TM) for your electric car.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Comboman (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:05am
    
    Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
    By the way, you can't make your Prius sound like a Harley Davidson. That sound is already trademarked.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:26am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
      Well, actually, no. They did file for a trademark, but the application has been withdrawn...
      
      http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4006:lfgng7.5.1
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dark Helmet (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:11am
    
    Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
    "Sounds like a new business model. For only $10 you can download a new EngineTone(TM) for your electric car."
    
    Oh yeah, that's wonderful. It's not bad enough that I have to listen to a blaring version of "Sexy Back" everytime the mindless teenage girl in front of me on the El gets a text message from some pimply reject trying to strip her of her sacred flower, NOW I have to listen to all manner of cars spew noises at me as they go hurtling past on Clark Street on my way to work?
    
    How long before those propietary noises get volume blasted and start violating noise ordinances?
    
    Oooooh, THEN we can have celebrities doing voiceovers for the cars and getting paid for it. That'd be even BETTER!
    
    Instead of a turn signal, you could just have a loop of Samuel L. Jackson screaming, "Turnin' left, motha fucka!" until you complete the turn....
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Headbhang (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:27am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
      Damn, you have just described my idea of a dystopian future.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - iNtrigued (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:37am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
      Hell, I'd pay money for that turn signal!
      
      Only I would add, "Make me say it one more time...*sound of gun being cocked* I dare you.. I triple dog dare you motha fucka!" For those drivers who like to cruise down the interstate for 45 min with their friggin blinker on.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Sean T Henry (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 10:04am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
        I would love to have that turn signal. After my homework is finished I think I might try to figure out how to do that with pizzo speakers.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        another mike (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 4:05pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
        It's piezo, but I think a standard hobby 8 Ohm project speaker would work better and probably cost less. You'll need a memory chip to hold the recording and a processor chip to control the playback, trigger playback off the indicator's blink. Mount that with an amp (if the speaker kit doesn't have its own) and a projection cone near the headlights so you've got power and ground nearby.
        So a PIC, an EEPROM, a speaker, a little project board to solder it all on to, plus all the resistors, capacitors, and bits to make it an engineered solution. Maybe $20, 25 shipped.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Michael Talpas (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:45am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
      I just want you to know, the idea of a car screaming on an endless loop, "Turnin' left, motha fucka!" is now my sole reason for liking the idea of silent cars being given noises.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Dark Helmet (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:57am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
        "I just want you to know, the idea of a car screaming on an endless loop, "Turnin' left, motha fucka!" is now my sole reason for liking the idea of silent cars being given noises."
        
        Yeah, I kind of have to admit that a soon as I wrote that and hit submit, I went back and read it over and suddenly decided that I like the idea after all. See? My ideas are so persuasive that they even change my own mind.
        
        I think I'd fill my car's noise hard drive up with quote drops from Sam and Max, Monkey Island, and DAy of the Tentacle.
        
        "This don't look like the Lincoln Tunnel, Sam!"
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Raybone (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 2:15pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
      Samuel L. Jackson screaming, "Turnin' left, motha fucka!"
      
      Classic!!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Duncan Yoyo (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 2:43pm
    
    Re: Re: Proprietary Noises
    I want my car to sound like a Stage Coach with two horses.
    
    Actually I want to be able to change the sound on a whim. Enterprise whooshes one day, wild horses the next, a bike with baseball cards in the spokes the next....
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dark Helmet (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:25am

Question answered
"Ever wonder why futuristic vehicles in science fiction movies have loud whirring/buzzing noises?"

Pshh! Not to mention those screeching tie fighters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:21am
  
  Re: Question answered
  Pointing out the obvious -> In a vacuum, along with the explosions and visible lasers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
noTHINGface, 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:28am

Prius is the silent killer..
Well, I've almost been hit by a Prius in my company car park, this was is enclosed too. They're really damn quiet. I should have looked both ways when I got out of my parked car but our instincts are still to use our ears.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- James (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:48am
  
  Re: Prius is the silent killer..
  Excellant. Darwin at work. those who cannot overcome their base instincts and use common sense will be selected for extinction.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael Long, 22 Sep 2009 @ 1:51pm
  
  Re: Prius is the silent killer..
  ".... but our instincts are still to use our ears."
  
  Our instincts used to be tuned towards listening for an approaching horse's hoves as we alighted from the carriage, but we seem to have adapted.
  
  Or does anyone think that today's gasoline-powered vehicles should have been required to make clippity-clop noises???
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:30am

Do they want someone walking with a red flag in front of the car too? I thought silent car = good car, and suicidal pedestrians = dead pedestrians.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcel de Jong (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:39am
  
  Re:
  and what about blind pedestrians? Or don't they have to cross streets anymore?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Marcel de Jong (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:39am

scifi? cool!
I want my future car to sound like a light sabre :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- J. Lemus, 22 Sep 2009 @ 9:32am
  
  Re: scifi? cool!
  I want mine to sound like the Jetson's car!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spacemanbob (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:50am

Drivers Need to be more aware
Since when has there been a rash of more blind people being hit by electric cars.... oh wait.... The Driver has to pass a drivers test to look out for pedestrians crossing streets. There is even a section on what to do when you see a person with a walking stick...SLOW DOWN...and then see what they are going to do.

Enough of the madness. There are enough driver laws about being aware of your surroundings. Driving is not a right as some think it is. It is a Privilege and if you don't follow the rules (Speeding..etc.) that will be taken away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:57am

They should just come up with a Nightrider version where the car uses radar and then yells "Hey, get out of the way."

I can understand the concern though. Go to London and on the streets they have painted on the street in front of the crosswalk "Look Left" or something like that for dumb Americans. Thankfully, The Brits know that Americans will walk right out in front of them looking the other way. Me, I was looking at the painted sign.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Doe, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:24am
  
  Re:
  Huh? So Brits have a stupid sign up and it is America's fault? It must be tough to carry such a chip on your shoulder.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Duncan Yoyo (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 2:48pm
    
    Re: Re:
    >Huh? So Brits have a stupid sign up and it is America's >fault? It must be tough to carry such a chip on your >shoulder.
    
    No, the Brits have the sign so that they don't have to treat American's run over by Brits in the National health system. Keeping expenses down with preventative signage. Besides slightly flattened visitors are bad for tourism.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:33am
  
  Re:
  Since people in Europe drive on the opposite side of the road than the US, wouldn't it be better to have a sign saying "Look Right"? You know, since when you step off the sidewalk the traffic is coming at you from the right. Maybe that's why the Americans are looking the wrong way when they start to cross the street, they're just following your signs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - RB, 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:34am
    
    Re: Re:
    All European countries drive on the same side as the US, EXCEPT for the UK. Hence the sign - it's not just for Yanks...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael Talpas (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:52am
    
    Re: Re:
    Chronno S. Trigger: "Since people in Europe drive on the opposite side of the road than the US, wouldn't it be better to have a sign saying "Look Right"? You know, since when you step off the sidewalk the traffic is coming at you from the right. Maybe that's why the Americans are looking the wrong way when they start to cross the street, they're just following your signs."
    
    That's a good point! They're trying to kill us, those sneaky europeans!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Matthew Krum (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:42am
  
  Re: Knight Rider
  If it sounded like KITT, it would more likely say, "Michael, I'm detecting a careless pedestrian 10 metres to the North West." or something similar. But, in London, wouldn't the 'sign' read "Look Right?" Here in The States I always look left as that's where the traffic is coming from. Plus, a Brit would be equally 'dumb' if they were here and stood on the side of the road all day looking for said 'painted sign.'
  PS. I want my Nissan to sound like a skateboard so security guards will harrass me. :-)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - eclecticdave (profile), 23 Sep 2009 @ 6:01am
    
    Re: Re: Knight Rider
    Even though I'm sure most people have probably figured it out by now ...
    
    The signs say "Look Left" only on roads such as one way streets where the traffic might be coming from an unexpected direction. We don't usually have signs saying "Look Right" on normal roads!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- JD, 15 Oct 2009 @ 11:20am
  
  Re:
  Well, being that 90% of the world drives on the right side, it's not just for the "dumb" Americans.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChrisB (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:01am

Hey, lets dart into traffic!
Since when do blind people just start running into the road if they don't hear any cars nearby? Wouldn't they cross at marked/lighted crosswalks, like everyone else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bradley Stewart, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:11am

How About
when approaching and intersection the sound of an air horn followed by a million candle power flashlight trained at eye level. That should do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mechwarrior, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:14am

Of course, since your car will now sound like a spinner from Blade Runner, one wouldnt mind that its producing fake noise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Doe, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:19am

What about electric motocycles?
Can we make electric motorcycles sound like Harley Davidsons? Of course we want the sound to be throttle position dependent so when we really lay into it the bike gets really loud. I can see it now; it will be the Bose HD Sound System for electric bikes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DARWIN, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:19am

"because the electric engines are "too quiet" and unsuspecting pedestrians who fail to look both ways are getting hit."

well excuse me, but if you are too stupid to look both ways (something taught to 1st graders) then maybe you deserve to be runover. its called natural selection.

the need for the government to pass laws to regulate stupidity makes me weep.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:23am
  
  Re:
  "the need for the government to pass laws to regulate stupidity makes me weep."
  
  Hey, everybody gets their fair share of stupidity and not one ounce more than that!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ron (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:20am

F*cking Stupid Idea
Pedesrians should look both ways and PAY F*CKING ATTENTION. Drivers should watch for hazards like people stepping off curbs without looking (this part includes blind pedestrians since they can't look) which means the drivers shoud PAY F*CKING ATTENTION.
People get struck by vehicles that make noise as well. Since we adjust to our environment, as the noise level increases, we just tune out the noise so noisier vehicles will not fix the problem; only make for more noise.
By the way, all vehicles make noise. My Prius may not have a huge revving engine but the tires make noise as it moves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fogbugz, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:23am

The next big thing for politicians
I can already see the next big hot button issue for politicians: We need laws to prohibit fake sounds from vehicles. It will happen the first time a politician hears an unusual sound from a vehicle, and it annoys him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David Leonhardt, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:26am

Maybe Nissan could help me add futuristic sounds to my own movements. Like "bpoing" when I bounce on the trampoline. And whoosh, when I sprint to the mailbox.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sneeje (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:26am

Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
Well, as a parent of small children on a street that has lots of children and moderate traffic, I can see a benefit in this. All of the parents on the street are on their children about looking both ways, but young children just don't have the discipline yet to do it consistently (it only takes forgetting once).

In addition, the teenagers on the street don't yet have the discipline to make others' safety their highest priority.

So while teaching and monitoring these groups is the most important approach to safety, having an extra cue (noise) is helpful.

There is a driver of a Prius that lives at one end of the street that I can say has snuck up on me at least once.

The best safety systems rely on no single failure point and instead include many cues that help the people involved avoid disaster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Doe, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:47am
  
  Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
  Think of the children man! We should outlaw everything because almost everything is dangerous to children.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Sneeje (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 9:34am
    
    Re: Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
    Right, that's exactly what I said... oh wait... except for the part about it not being black or white. And noise being helpful, and the part about having no single failure point. and never saying the word "outlaw".
    
    Other than that, you summarized my point beautifully.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:00am
  
  Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
  As a parent of small children, my reaction is: if you cannot trust your children to look both ways, then you cannot trust them to cross the street unsupervised*. If you cannot trust them to not cross the street when they've been told not to, then you cannot trust them to be outside unsupervised. Kids earn privileges by earning parents' trust, right?
  
  Don't force cars to be noisier, just know your children and set appropriate limits to ensure their safety.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Sneeje (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 9:30am
    
    Re: Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
    I'm not advocating outlawing anything. I'm just saying that noise would be a fantastic additional safety measure.
    
    I guess you didn't really read my post where I said that teaching them this is important. We and the other parents *never* leave the children unsupervised. But anyone that has kids knows that even constant supervision is not 100% effective. It is ignorant and disingenuous to say otherwise.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - nasch (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 4:14pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
      True, you did not advocate mandating it, and just said there is a benefit. Possibly, but the Nissan's system turns off at 12mph apparently. If your street is like mine (a residential street that doesn't lead anywhere else), all the traffic except people pulling in and out of driveways is well above 12 anyway, so no effect.
      
      Nothing is 100% effective, so I'm not sure what your point is there.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Sneeje (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 6:15pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
        My point is that safety should never be based on one line of defense, and the best systems have multiple layers because while each one is never 100% effective, total failure requires the failure of every layer and its likelihood goes down.
        
        I.e., silence + pedestrian vigilance + driver vigilance
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:16pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well, it doesn't have to be black or white...
        I.e., silence + pedestrian vigilance + driver vigilance
        
        + big fluffy bumpers
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jesse, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:26am

Make is sound like a jetson's car. I'd buy it then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bios, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:26am

http://www.vroombox.com/vroombox/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Elohssa (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:30am

Why so negative?
This is great news for aftermarket mod retailers.

Your hybrid could sound like a Tie fighter!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chris Tromley, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:32am

New = reason for fear
When the first automobiles hit the road there were laws requiring a man to walk in front of it carrying a lantern or flag or some such nonsense. This is so idiotic as to make me ashamed of my species.

The only time you can hear the engine of many cars is when they are accelerating. Under cruise or coast all you can hear is the tires. Stand on any street corner and pay attention to prove it to yourself.

If there was any sanity in government, any sound laws would require a minimum sound level for *all* cars. You want some serious bitching? Wait until buyers of Lexus, BMW, etc. have to have "vroom-vroom" noises on their cars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:32am

Cards in Bicycle Spokes
I remember when I was a kid we used to attach playing cards to our bicycles so that they would make "motor" sounds as the spokes of the wheel hit them. I guess we were just ahead of our time. Maybe they should make it a law that everyone has to do that now, for the benefit of all the blind people, you know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AC, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:37am

i love the sound of an engine
Chevy should make a deal with Flowmaster to make the Volt sound like a big block Chevy 350 with Flowmaster headers and pipes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
james, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:46am

Darwin effect
Just let the low IQs who get run over die and with in a few generations there will be no idiots who don't look before crossing... Simple evolution

The stupid, absent minded, non observant - all will be killed by my silence...

You have been warned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Greek Polanski, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:46am

Wasted oppurtunity.
Should have had a marketing gimmick with the general public submitting noises on youtube in exchange for cash prizes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
known coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:50am

i wish to copywrite all
looney tunes noises as applied to the car. a porky pig g-g-g-g-eett out of the way. An after accident daffy duck "your dispicable". how bout a buggs bunny carrot chomping noise while waiting at a light??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cseiter (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:55am

Downloaded sounds
I'd pull down a Dalek voice. "Ex-ter-mi-nate the humans!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CiderWoman, 22 Sep 2009 @ 7:59am

A Necessity For Some
Sure, the addition of a futuristic sound to Nissan's vehicles might seem frivolous - until you consider that there are hundreds of thousands of pedestrians who cannot see. It's not that we simply "fail to look both ways" - we can't. So hearing the approach of a vehicle as we're traveling independently on foot is a necessity for our own safety. Even for those who travel with the assistance of a service dog, it's crucial that the person be aware of traffic in order to make decisions about when to step out into the street: the service dog is a sort of backup, there to lead the individual around obstacles, or refuse to move forward into the street if it sees a vehicle in the path. Speaking for those of us traveling with nothing more than our white canes and our wits at the ready, I applaud Nissan for a decision that's a necessity for the safety of many, blind or sighted. And who says futuristic sounds aren't fun? A change of scenery for the ears s always interesting!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:09am
  
  Re: A Necessity For Some
  Well, if a blind person can't hear the sounds of the tires above 12mph, they're screwed because the sound turns off above 12. And if someone can't stop, or can't pay attention at below 12mph, they need their license revoked permanently.
  
  This isn't completely frivolous, they're doing this to enhance their public image and as a gimmick. Why else would they pick Blade Runner sounds?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chris Tromley, 22 Sep 2009 @ 9:29am
  
  Re: A Necessity For Some
  I'm one of those people who's in favor of handicapped ramps in buildings and intersections, disabled-friendly bathrooms, etc. - even though the cost is high and there are relatively few handicapped people. It's the right thing to do and the cost per able-bodied person is almost nil.
  
  When all cars are silent I think it makes perfect sense to require all vehicles to make some reasonable minimum level of noise, even if the only people it helps is blind people.
  
  It is utterly boneheaded to direct such legislation at electric vehicles only. There are millions of cars on the road *today* that are too quiet for blind pedestrians. Take the electric vehicle distinction out of the requirement.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 12:58pm
  
  Re: A Necessity For Some
  Sure, the addition of a futuristic sound to Nissan's vehicles might seem frivolous - until you consider that there are hundreds of thousands of pedestrians who cannot see.
  
  Consider yourself lucky and quit thinking just of yourself: there are those that can neither see NOR hear. That's why we need a federal law limiting all vehicles to a maximum speed of 5 MPH and requiring big fluffy pillows for bumpers so that the blind AND deaf won't be so severely injured when they step out in front of moving vehicles. It's just the right thing to do.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:00am

Fake Car Noises
With all of the noise we have to put up with in today's modern life,(not to mention falsly increasing the exhaust noise on a vehicle, so when it is travelling down the outside lane on a 4 lane motorway, the booming noise in your car, in the nearside lane, nearly blows your eardrums out), having vehicles that are very quiet is a blessing.

Keep the new cars silent and get people to look after themselves, by looking before crossing etc.

We should also be looking at noise cancellation on the motoways to further get rid of the tyre noise of vehicles traveling along them.

The silent cars are a good step towards a better quieter life for all occupy this earth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sergio, 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:02am

No Need
OK, electric vehicles are not 100% silent, as long as they are moving, they are making noise. Also, most cars have day running lights, so they stand out better, so as long as we're all doing what our parents told us to do when we were 3 and look both ways before stepping out into the street, we'll all be fine. Bikes make as much noise as an electric car (maybe less) and they even travel on the sidewalk with no lights and people don't get hit by them.

As for blind people, we all know they have superhero level hearing and smell, so they'll be fine. The ones with dogs will also be fine since dogs rely on both sight and sound.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cesar, 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:17am

Need evidence for silent vehicles hitting pedestrians?
Well, if you need to be convinced that silent vehicles hit more pedestrians, just come to Amsterdam and rent a bicycle for a day. I've surprised quite a few unaware pedestrians. And that is with a dedicated, red bicycle lane...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:29am
  
  Re: Need evidence for silent vehicles hitting pedestrians?
  That sounds like incompetence on the part of the Amsterdam pedestrians. If that's a properly labeled bicycle lane then they're walking where they shouldn't be. Think about it, in the US if you're walking down the middle of the road (or one of the properly labeled bike lanes) and a cop pulls up behind you, what would he say?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dark Helmet (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:34am
    
    Re: Re: Need evidence for silent vehicles hitting pedestrians?
    "Think about it, in the US if you're walking down the middle of the road (or one of the properly labeled bike lanes) and a cop pulls up behind you, what would he say?"
    
    In Chicago? Depends what color you are. It varies from a simple "What the fuck do you think you're doing?" to a double-tap to the chest with a little crack sprinkled on you for good measure....
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Falindraun (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:43am

If I had a choice on what my car sounded like id either go with a weed-eater or a tie fighter from star wars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cliff De Witt, 22 Sep 2009 @ 8:50am

Too Quiet Cars
As a commuting cyclist I do think that this would be an OK idea not necessarliy a good one.

Too many riders are hit and killed by drivers too drunk or too distracted to pay attnetion to the others on the road a noise maker on electric cars would be a big help. I do hear the tire noise but in trafic there can be a lot of tire noise and where exactly is it coming from? While I am looking to locate all the cars around me will one of them decide to pull orver and take the space I'm using?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 12:46pm
  
  Re: Too Quiet Cars
  ...a noise maker on electric cars would be a big help. I do hear the tire noise but in trafic there can be a lot of tire noise and where exactly is it coming from?
  
  Umm, wouldn't you have that same problem with the "noise makers"?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 9:02am

HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Just like when people worried about car startling horses. How in the world did people ever adapt from the relatively quite horse to a noisy car?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Robert, 22 Sep 2009 @ 10:10am

1 vote for some kind of noise/sound
My wife and I were in Florence a few years ago when they had and expo of different types of electric vehicles (cars, mopeds, etc). They had a number of these vehicles on hand and it was possible to rent or otherwise test drive these vehicles around the area. Well, anyone who's been to Europe knows that most vehicles (especially mopeds) are quite noisy and you get into the habit of listening for their approach from behind. That's how you know they're there. While wandering around town that day we had several near misses when, not hearing any significant sound, we decided to cross the street only to hear a moped/car horn warn us out of the way just in time. The only real sound these vehicles made was from the pop, pop, pop, of the tires over the cobblestone roads. It's not so much an excuse as it is just to point out that that's the way our minds are conditioned to expect things and until that paradigm changes it's an accident waiting to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 12:39pm
  
  Re: 1 vote for some kind of noise/sound
  While wandering around town that day we had several near misses when, not hearing any significant sound, we decided to cross the street only to hear a moped/car horn warn us out of the way just in time.
  
  Are you both blind?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Griff (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 11:33am

RR used to have this problem too.
I had a job interview at the Rolls Royce car factory as a teenager and they had to warn us that half built cars creeping round the factory roads were a silent hazard.
This Prius problsm ain't new !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dbrusiee (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 11:51am

the problem is in the parking lots
Folks, I have witnessed a number of near accidents in parking lots. Most drivers park so that they have to back up to get out of their spot thus creating a high risk situation. And of course a silent car makes matters even worse. And people will walk right behind a car that is about to back out ignoring the back up lights etc. I don't see much of a problem when crossing a street especially at a light. Of course people walking or driving while on the cell phone is just an accident waiting to happen. Cheers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Danny, 22 Sep 2009 @ 12:07pm

Danger Will Robinson!!!
If that is the case can I request that my car shout "Danger Will Robinson!" instead just some random noise.

Or maybe the red alert sound from Star Trek: The Next Generation...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PrometheeFeu (profile), 22 Sep 2009 @ 12:11pm

That sounds fun. I think you should be able to set all sorts of different noises. I want my car to sound like an X-wing or possibly a lightsaber... I'm sure you can tell what Sci-Fi universe I'm fond of...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2009 @ 5:39pm

Put a radar on the car :)

As for the sound pollution that this could cause there are to ways to deal with it. Buy a wax ear plug or wait for the "Frog mask" to become reality. It will be powered by NVidia probably LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sergio, 23 Sep 2009 @ 6:19am

Woof
I want mine to sound like angry barking dogs. I can see blind people crapping their pants already!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Connor, 23 Sep 2009 @ 6:52am

Nissan Making Noises (Ecar)
Why not the sound of horses hooves? They could clop along merrily at around 25mph, then speed up the rhythm as the vehicle accelerates. Just before the Leaf skitters into an apparently drugged out and oblivious pedestrian, it could have reached the crescendo of a stampeding herd. How exciting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2009 @ 2:25pm

Cartones = Ringtones
Oh boy, I can just see the market now. A whole new market selling various custom "cartones".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous1, 3 Aug 2010 @ 3:56am

Nissan SUCKS
Useless & stupid vehicle company
Nissan are scum, morons & assholes
All their vehicles are shit, rubbish & garbage
Their companies must be removed from this face of this planet
Nissan SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS & SUCKS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 May 2012 @ 10:18pm

defeats the purpose of the quiet electric car to reduce noise pollution, now the fuckheads what to add more noise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]