Texas Instruments Goes Legal On Calculator Hackers: How Dare You Make Our Product Better!
from the seriously? dept
I have to admit that I cannot remember where (perhaps it was in the comments on Techdirt?), but I recently saw a discussion among a few people discussing how odd it is that computers and mobile phones have advanced so much... but scientific calculators still are nearly identical as to what they were decades ago. The state of the art seems to have frozen somewhere in the 1980s. Perhaps it's because Texas Instruments, one of the major calulator makers out there, goes around threatening people who hack their calculators to run additional software on them. Apparently, the company is sending DMCA takedown notices to people who have posted code for running other software on their TI calculators. This is clearly against what the DMCA was designed to do, but is a consequence of the overly broad (and, frankly, ridiculous) anti-circumvention clause found in the DMCA.This is a perfect example of how the DMCA is used by companies to prevent innovation, not to stop copying. Notice that there is no "copying" of any TI software going on here. It's just that in being able to run this software, apparently you need to bypass some protection measures that TI installed. Thus, TI claims, it's a circumvention and a violation of the DMCA. Of course, as the article (and various experts) note in the article, both the Copyright Office and the courts have often looked down on such blatant misuses of the DMCA, but for now the legal threats worked. The people contacted have removed the code.
Frankly, I can't fathom how this makes any sense at all for TI. Making its calculators more useful and interesting should only increase demand for the calculators. TI makes its money selling the physical product, not the software on the calculators. So what possible business rationale is there for stopping such hacking? It seems only sure to decrease the market, not increase it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: calculators, copyright, dmca
Companies: texas instruments
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I know why
But that's got nothing, at all, to do with copyright. That's a total abuse of copyright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I know why
I suppose I can actually see this in a sense--TI calculators are considered the gold standard and a necessity in most math-oriented classes not because the students really think spending $100 bucks on them is worth the money, but because teachers require them. If their calculators were to become much easier to jailbreak and magnify capabilities, then it would be more difficult for teachers and test administrators to immediately gauge this beyond a quick glance at the product type. That, in turn, could lead to new policies perhaps detrimental to TI's bottom line.
Of course, none of this means that the DMCA is any less bad for society and consumers in general--I'm sure TI could easily add a visual indicator or something if a calculator were modified, or any number of other innovations, but they don't have to because of copyright enforcements. Showing again why copyrights and patents hinder innovation instead of the other way around. I can understand why interested players will continue to talk up their benefits, but it's amazing that so many consumers actually believe it. Chalk it up to humans' natural proclivity for being stupid and gullible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I know why
On the other hand why on earth do they allow any calculators in tests in the first place?
On the other other hand why don't TI just make an old fashioned non-programmable calculator for that market?
It seems to me that we have managed to arrive in the worst possible situation where genuine curiosity and ingenuity (surely the pinnacle of educational value) is being stamped on in the interests of allowing the relatively stupid (ie those who need a calculator to do sums) to pass tests set by the lazy (examiners that can't be bothered to reverse engineer their questions properly) without allowing the really stupid to cheat. (Except that the really stupid couldn't manage to cheat that way anyway.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I know why
Not it it has no program memory (eg the 1970's PE Digicalc) - or uses OTP (one time programmable) devices (eg fusible links).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I know why
Prove me wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I know why
'and if they don't, they fail'
if memory serves, programmable calculators were expressly forbidden in every exam i ever took where maths was relevant. 'course, I'm in NZ... which has penguins, and is thus better, but more significantly, seems to be the home of 'weird takes on normal stuff'... sometimes good, sometimes not...
non-programmable calculators were allowed in a lot of sciences and the like, mind you.
another possible reason calculators haven't really gone anywhere, is that most of the demand for them is pretty much for something that is highly portable, easy to use, and does [semi-]basic mathematics to reduce careless errors in, say, accounting[or just personal record keeping].
and even a lot of that sort of thing is done on computers these days....
as usual, this comment does not have any particular point :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I know why
Right, because in every advanced algebra or calculus course you must be testing all of the fundamental math as well. I'm sorry, but when I'm thinking about partial differential equations to model a vibrating system I'm not overly concerned about my multiplication tables. I use my calculator to check/do the basics while relying on my intellect to do the advanced work. Plus since it'll take several minutes without a calculator to solve complicated (yet still considered basic) math with a high degree of confidence you immediately limit the number of topics you are actually testing over because you have a time limit
Of course it goes without question that once you graduate and need to do math for your job you won't ever be able to use a calculator or even excel, so you better practice doing everything with pen and paper and your brain.
Boss: Is that a CALCULATOR!!??
You: ... Yes?
Boss: You're FIRED!!
--or--
You: Here's the report boss
Boss: The bell rang 5 minutes ago and I saw you talk to Jimmy while you were working on it
You: What bell? and I asked Jimmy for some help.
Boss: WHAT!?
You: Are you ok boss?
Boss: You're FIRED!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I know why
I once had a professor that would race us at complex math problems. We had high dollar graphing calculators....he had a slide rule. He often won. He also could do 8 digit multiplication in his head as fast as you could do it in your calculator. This man is obviously an outlier and not representative of the general population of people who can do long division of high order numbers in their head in 30 seconds to a minute vs. several seconds on a calculator.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I know why
We should ban arms!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I know why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I know why
This kinda makes me want to dig mine out again and see what I can do with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I know why
You know why? Because you can easily program the stock calculator to simulate clearing the memory without actually doing so, in a way that is very difficult to detect. So, the situation TI is claiming to be trying to prevent already exists, and has existed for as long as the calculators have been around.
TI's actual problem is one of image -- they benefit from an undeserved reputation of being cheat-proof among educators, and are terribly afraid that the misperception will be corrected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here, I mentioned it here
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090916/0406396211.shtml
and here
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090916/0211316207.shtml
Not to mention here
http://controversialskepticism.blogspot.com/2008/03/are-graphing-calculators-too-expensive.h tml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not removed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Value
Well I would have thought that labour would have been quite a significant cost, also packaging, distribution and retailers cut.
The again the "intellectual property" includes the design of the chips, circuit boards, displays etc not just the firmware. Plus that firmware has probably been around for 25 years now - so it's paid for itself many times over.
The pricing of these things is basically all "marketing" now anyway. Back in the early 80's Casio used to sell different grades of calculator at different prices - but they were the same really - the only difference was the printing on the keys and the instruction manual. If you had access to the instruction book for one of the expensive ones you could make the cheap one do all the same stuff!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We need to change the law so that TI has as much to lose by stopping innovation as those they suppress.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti Democratic
Maybe but I think there could still be some set of rules to making laws like asking for a minimal set of standards that require at least that any law that do not achieve some threshold should be automatically strike down or laws should be evaluated on the basis of functionality and not only aesthetics, there's got to be some kind of process that would make those people in congress look less stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hacking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ever since these calculators have been able to do things like compute integrals or factor or solve equations symbolically, there has been a trend away from allowing students to use them on exams (even aside from the issue of using them to "cheat" by storing notes for closed book exams).
Thus, from the students' point of view, there's no real reason to want a more powerful graphic calculator when they couldn't use it on many exams (and for more demanding computations, their university probably licenses mathematica/maple/matlab/etc. anyway).
Of course, none of this explains why the prices are still so high...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's a pro calculator innovation argument
It's cheating because it's having written notes in an exam isn't it? Oh, but that's not what the ruling was at all. The ruling allowed it because they defined an exam as a random generic scenario a student might encounter in real life that may for some reason require similar skills. And they concluded that in this random event, there are only two things that are certain at any given time to help them succeed. The first is obviously their brain, and the second is their tattoos. The reasoning was something like "well you're not going to show up for work one day and forget your arms."
So using that precedent, I move that TI make a flexible OLED calculator and partner up with the world's best tattoo artists in order to tattoo this bad boy into your skin! They could make it charge with one of those charging tables once those become more effective. Or by some bio-mechanical conversion of energy. Whichever innovation becomes most successful first because tattooing a touch screen computer in your arm will probably be the last piece of the puzzle that's ready to go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
Look, I won't insult you by coming out and saying that you should know better, but...
Look at the success Apple has had with the iPhone. A BIG part of that success has to do with ENABLING our customers to ENHANCE their experience through MODIFICATION of the device that we sell to them.
Want to have the "iPhone" of the calculator world? Do what we do. Or you may find that someone just gets tired of your shit and writes an iPhone App to replace you.
Think about it.
Steve
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
I will take your point and remind you that however "Closed" the device is, it still has THOUSANDS of third-party Apps, created by a legion of clever programmers and there is no denying that the device and it's software base has REVOLUTIONIZED the market that it plays in.
This is the point that the New Fake Steve Jobs is making. TI could do well to learn from it. It's a good point. Don't mess with the NFSJ.
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
It is ironic though that you chastise TI and praise Apple for being open (which are not even analogus), yet Apple is the most notorious company for not allowing their customers to modify products they bought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
...and ignoring the fact that you claimed the New Fake Steve Jobs was "praising" Apple for being open, when he did no such thing...
Let us focus on this: Apple is not sending DMCA takedown notices to anyone for hacking their iPhone. They don't like it, but they aren't abusing the DMCA to get their way.
Bottom line? TI should create an App Store and provide the ability for folks to have the functionality they want. If users want to subvert their device, TI can go ahead and not like it, and/or take steps to make it more difficult, but abusing the DMCA to achieve what they want is just plain wrong.
This is the point that the New Fake Steve Jobs was making. It was a good point. You missed it, and instead put words in the New Fake Steve Jobs' mouth to create a straw-man that you could attack with your childish TI FanBoy arguments.
The New Fake Steve Jobs does not approve.
My condolences,
Steve
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
Apple, you have been warned. From within no less.
Ignore the New Fake Steve Jobs at your peril.
Steve.
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Calculators are useless, they can only give you answers.
Blackadder: Try to have a thought of your own, Baldrick, thinking is so important. What do you think?
Baldrick: I think thinking is so important my lord.
Current education in a nutshell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is Your Property to do with as you Please
We can pull out the usual analogy to the automobile, when you buy the car, you have the ability to make modifications to it. Including the ability to modify the engine.
It's unfortunate that too many people unthinkingly accept the premise that the manufactures somehow retain an undeserved ownership privilege.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It is Your Property to do with as you Please
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.core77.com/competitions/GreenerGadgets/projects/4673/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People can use math with out understanding the major issues at play under (x-1)(x+1) and what kind of graph it will make.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to Open Letter to TI from The New Fake Steve Jobs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welcome To Mrtincarol.net Buy Steroids Branded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]