As Newspaper Execs Discuss Putting Up Online Paywalls, London Evening Standard Paper Edition Goes Free
from the which-way-do-you-go? dept
We keep hearing newspaper industry execs claim that the news can't be free, and they absolutely have to put up paywalls to start charging for content online. And yet... not everyone appears to agree. Lots of folks are sending in the news today that the London Evening Standard has decided to go from a fee-based newspaper to a freesheet. Starting in a week or so, Londoners will be able to pick up a free copy of the newspaper, rather than paying for it. They're preparing to more than double the printed circulation, assuming that many more people will be interested in the free paper (and, thus, greatly boosting their ad inventory). Alexander Lebedev, who only recently bought a controlling stake in the paper has the right idea:"I am confident that more than doubling the London Evening Standard's circulation and maintaining its quality journalism is what is best for London. An essential fabric of a free and democratic society is high quality journalism. It acts as a deterrent against corruption and is a way to highlight what is beneficial and worth celebrating. I want to invest in newspapers in general for this purpose and in the London Evening Standard in particular. The Standard has been producing exceptional journalism since 1827 and that is not going to change under my ownership. The London Evening Standard is the first leading quality newspaper to go free and I am sure others will follow."Again, this highlights the silliness of trying to set up a paywall. All that does is open up an opportunity for someone else to go free, and to soak up all of the readership.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free newspapers
Companies: london evening standard
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The website looks good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free Business Model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
over time, the ads to news ratio has gone up, the city paper got merged with several regional papers, and then the regional elements got largely jettisoned... all that good stuff.
on the other hand, what they Do cover and give space to, is still usually very informative and well done, they still do community news bits, and so on.
i remember when the thing came three times a week and was about half as thick as the one you pay for, [even the weekend editions], had a local section they switched depending on where you were, and had a lot less full page ads and such. the main one now seems to be at least half advertising, most of the reporting isn't actually news exactly, and their choice of what to headline can be outright bizarre sometimes, only come out twice a week, much smaller.
seems less prone to noticeable bias, too.
it's really hard to figure out what i think of the free papers... so many different ways to measure, and some produce 'it's awesome!' and others 'it sucks!'
and i've completely forgotten my point.
also, i don't live in London :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Murdoch dropped The London Paper a couple of weeks ago, but The Evening Standard going free should be quite a jump in journalistic standards from the other freesheets available in London. I would rarely pay for it, but I'll certainly pick it up over London Lite now it's gone free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The paper I currently work at is in one of two test areas that is going behind a paywall as a trial run for Media News Group. (Nobody who works at the paper got a say in this and we all think it's a stupid idea.) We compete with another paper in the city, but thankfully they're owned by the same people.
I'd think that the best idea would be to have one paper go behind a paywall and the other stick to the free model and see which one works better. But no, we're both going behind the paywall, so at least we're screwed together.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The best part
That's very refreshing. All too often you just hear "newspapers are essential to society"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Except the ES is horrible
My blog post: http://notnews.today.com/2009/10/02/evening-standard-to-pay-readers-to-take-it/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Village Voice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ES competition
For me, I would read the ES but it's a hassle having to stop and get my wallet out for 50p. I'll most certainly be picking up a copy now it's free.
Another aspect of a free paper is it seems people are more likely to leave it behind on the tube. If you buy a paper and take it home, then it'll get 1 or 2 sets of eyeballs before being binned. Leaving it on the tube gives it the potential for many more sets of eyeballs for one paper. Of course this does mean more cleaning on the tube, but (generally) the papers are left on the seat or behind next to the window so aren't (too) untidy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metro
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
adult store
[ link to this | view in chronology ]