Is The Internet Creating An Age Of Consumer Power?
from the there's-an-app-for-that dept
I have to admit that I can't quite tell if Baltimore Sun columnist Dan Rodricks is being somewhat facetious in noting that for every "ephemeral" consumer wrong (ridiculous fees, interest rates, closing costs, lines at the motor vehicle bureau) groups of people are suddenly able to gather a constituency online and create a social movement. While some may mock the idea that a bunch of consumers might gather online to fight the good fight over lines at their local motor vehicle bureau (department, administration, whatever your local gov't calls it), it actually does seem indicative of how consumers are gaining more of a voice online -- and with that comes power. Yes, there are some ridiculous and overly broad complaints. But we're getting closer and closer to an age where companies that repeatedly screw consumers over will have a harder and harder time getting away with it. Too many businesses have been built on the belief that even if they treat consumers badly, not enough people will know (or care) to stop bringing them business. But we've already seen some signs of that changing, and that's only going to increase over time.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: consumer power, internet
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Little Guy/Girl
I for one welcome that age with open arms. With increasing amounts of information available out there, we can make more informed decisions on just about anything.
We may already be in this age actually. I remember when I was still in elementary school and doctors wanted to damn near cut me in half to correct some kidney problems. Luckily for me, my mother took it upon herself to research different surgeries online(and with Dial-up to boot... ouch). Found out about a laser surgery that only makes very small(and now nearly invisible) scars. Back when she asked the "doctors" about it they got all high&mighty on her and told her she shouldn't be doing research, just follow them blindly. I thank God she didn't!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In the past, most businesses would be a name behind a product. Nowadays that name has a face, a voice, and a reputation, whether they're wanted or not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Absolutely, yes
Depending on what you mean, absolutely it is. I don't believe it actually does much to lower prices on non-digital goods (at least not to much of an extent), but the ability to stop abusive behavior and scare the hell out of those that are abusive or even borderline abusive is certainly there.
A case in point was when I did a trial membership for Bally's and then got bombarded with phone calls and SPAM from the GM of the local club trying to pitch memberships to me. I asked a few times not to be contacted, but she still did.
Then I fired off an email noting the number of times I'd complained and my willingness to pursue further action against them if they continued. I threw a few links to the various local/federal laws prohibiting what she was doing. THEN, for added fun, I informed her that she shouldn't be doing this stuff in the internet age because look what I can find: First was consumer rants and complaints against Bally's nationwide, then a few links complaining about that SPECIFIC Bally's, then several the complained about the GM contacting me BY NAME.
Needless to say, the apologetic email I got that same day was the digital communication equivalent of her shitting all over herself and then rubbing the dookie in her hair in dismay.
They haven't contacted me since...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Consumerist
Dot
Com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I think you are somewhat right
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seems to be a necessity
One of the points raised in the comments was that it no longer seems sufficient to declare "I'll take my business elsewhere" and then do so, never to be heard from again. The business just quietly finds another sucker and keeps doing the same thing. Lawsuits are too costly for the individual, so that's not a valid threat either. The internet creates a more level playing field again for the reasons mentioned in the article. Rather than simply taking one's business elsewhere, a more effective technique is to use the facts of ones own experience to help others avoid the problematic product. That seems to magnify the pain enough to warrant attention.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Seems to be a necessity
We must stop being brainwashed into whom the mainstream media tells us are acceptable candidates to vote for or who they advertise the most and vote on candidates based on the merits of their position and not the funding of their candidacy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Power to the People!
Now should every company be punished to the n-th degree for every sin? No, you have to seperate the average disgruntled customer from a pattern of abuse by the company. But I think the internet finally gives people the power to spot the trends.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Absolutely, yes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ClueTrain
http://cluetrain.com/#manifesto
(scroll through the jump)
i particularly like this one:
"7. Hyperlinks subvert hierarchy."
seems appropriate here, as does a large portion of the manifesto.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Seems to be a necessity
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Power to the People!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138996/Eolas_files_patent_lawsuit_against_22_compan ies
Someone needs to take those pricks out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Power to the People!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nice feel-good story...
Credit cards, too -- why is my savings account only earning half a percent, but my credit cards are raising their rates to nearly 25%?! Aren't interest rates supposed to be the lowest ever??
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The BPA example
After the FDA's confirmation of BPA's supposed safety, there was a huge backlash online. Articles showed up regularly on Google News. People blogged about it. E-mail chains started about it. And a few months later, lo and behold, just about every baby bottle on the shelf now proclaims "BPA Free." Last week, I noticed one brand of canned vegetables at the grocery store with the same label. This did not happen because of government regulation, but because of the informative power of the Internet, and the consumer demand that resulted from it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The BPA example
And that's a perfect example of redundancy. I think I meant, "...a perfect example of consumer empowerment by the Internet..." Oh, well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nice feel-good story...
How about we get government-regulated monopolies, duopolies, and local monopolies OUT of the way, and thus allow real competition?
That said, I understand there are some markets where collusion and unethical practices are far too common (for example, the current financial industry). It could well be because the financial industry has a bit more of a captive hold on their customers than other types of companies. In any case, I recognize that regulation is occasionally necessary, so don't assume I am an extreme, right-wing, pure-capitalist guy. I do, however, believe that a competitive market should always be the first attempt to attack a problem, as it is the most efficient by far, and it usually works.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The BPA example
What if BPA were the safest material available, and it was only the spread of bad information that caused companies to remove it, in favor of a compound that, it turned out, was more dangerous?
I sure hope that wasn't the case in this example (it's also outside of my expertise). While it may be comforting to believe the truth will rise above the noise, I'm too skeptical to believe that will always be the case.
In this example, I have to wonder: why did the FDA approve BPA? Did it just bow to corporate interests, or did it truly find it safe? Either answer is more than a little disturbing...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The BPA example
The public would always prefer believing a simple lie (BPA is safe) versus a slightly complicated truth: Respected, scientific studies indicate BPA is dangerous.
This wasn't mindless mob rule. This was the viral spread of the plain, HIDDEN (by the FDA) truth.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]