Michael Dell Recognizes Blocking What Customers Want To Protect Your Own Biz Model Is Dumb
from the smart-man dept
There have been lots of different writeups on Michael Dell's recent Churchill Club talk, with most focusing on his trashing of netbooks or talking up Windows 7. But at the end of that article there was something even more interesting, which Derek pointed out to us:Clark asked Dell about the fact that, through virtualization, many companies end up buying fewer servers, and less hardware in general. "The first thing you have to remember is that any time a new technology comes along that's good for customers, you get in the way of it at your own peril," Dell said.Indeed. This is a point that so few companies seem to recognize. Instead of focusing on what the customers actually want, they freak out about how it may cause them to sell less of what they currently offer. This is the key in avoiding the innovator's dilemma and marketing myopia. You have to focus on what benefits the customer actually gets -- and if you try and get in the way of that, they'll just go somewhere else instead. But it's so rare to hear execs actually recognize that point -- so, kudos to Michael Dell for acknowledging it.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: consumers, michael dell
Companies: dell
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Perhaps he has a point about screen size (I haven't really used a netbook to know) but regarding the slower performance, so long as intellectual property doesn't hinder innovation, netbooks will invariably become faster with more disk space. But he can trash the netbook all he wants, that's his opinion, so long as he doesn't try to in any way prevent others from producing and buying them or restrict the open market. I may not like laptops, I may not like a particular brand of car, I may not like to drive trucks or maybe I don't like to drive small cars. That's just my preference, and I can announce it to the world or not. Nothing wrong with that.
Though I did find this interesting.
"Microsoft doesn’t allow companies to sell netbooks with the Windows XP home edition with more than 1 GB memory"
http://gigaom.com/2009/10/12/notebooks-vs-netbooks-can-you-tell-the-difference/
and since when does Microsoft have such authority?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Microsoft doesn’t allow companies to sell netbooks with the Windows XP home edition with more than 1 GB memory"
http://gigaom.com/2009/10/12/notebooks-vs-netbooks-can-you-tell-the-difference/
and since when does Microsoft have such authority?
microsoft can do whatever they damn well please. they are microsoft, after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
so you have: one smart guy in a sea of idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
now,,,,
(oh and stop hiring crappy support techs.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: now....
Typing FAIL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: now,,,,
That's coming from someone who loves to tinker, loves open source, loves alternative software, and loves to operate outside of the norm. Think about the general public's reaction. When Linux is as accessible as Windows, you can expect the big companies to start offering it on equal footing, but not until.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: now,,,,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Netbooks
Netbooks are a money-loser for Microsoft. The reason they stipulated that netbooks had to have less than 1gb RAM was to save money. They were practically giving away XP for free to compete on price against the early models which all ran Linux; so they made a bunch of rules as to what sort of machine could get the discounted operating systems to save some cash. Naturally, manufacturers didn't even bother building machines with higher specifications: customers would complain if they couldn't get Windows XP on them. Netbooks have a reputation for being slow and crappy. This reputation is an entirely arbitrary consequences of Microsoft's attempt to rig the game.
Even Windows 7 is sluggish on today's netbooks. And Microsoft can't keep giving away XP forever. Linux operating systems run perfectly well on netbooks if they have been built and configured properly. The early netbooks that came with Linux were not built properly, however. Their early success is quite remarkable, if you think about it, considering how awful some of the early models were. This is beginning to change. Dell have an Ubuntu netbook line that's actually pretty good, for instance. But it doesn't make them as much money to sell them as it does for them to sell Windows machines. Linux on netbooks is a legitimate threat to the profits of many people. Microsoft knows it; Michael Dell knows it. That's one of the reasons both of them would much rather netbooks just went away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Netbooks
It's also, based on my own experience, totally unjustified. I wouldn't try using Photoshop, editing 3D graphics or playing Crysis on one, but they were never really designed for that. For getting your email and typing up some sales report or homework assignment on a train or in a cafe, however, they're perfect; 1GB of RAM is actually overkill for that sort of role, and they're also cheap enough that having one go missing or get trashed isn't a bank-breaking disaster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Value for the Customer
Q: "If your car is too durable, there go your replacement sales."
A: "I got a little tired of cars wearing out every three years, didn't you? The idea is to give solid value, not plant a suction pump in the customer's wallet."
Q: "You'll cut your bottom line, won't you?"
A: "We haven't forgotten the bottom line. But there's another line you don't want to forget, either."
Q: "What's that?"
A: "The bottom line is the gain you get. The top line is the gain you deliver in return. If you provide the customer with a buy well worth having, you've taken care of the top line. That doesn't guarantee a profit, but Ford, Edison, Bell, Land, and a host of others have done right by the top line, and everyone was better off because of it. Naturally, the bottom line is important. But there needs to be something on the top line first!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Servers
Once company I worked with did exactly that. However, they ended up buying several high-end dual quad-core high-availabilty servers with a boatload of RAM on which to run the virtual images, as opposed to buying a dozen or more low-end commodity pizza boxes.
I suspect that margins on the high-end severs were perhaps just "slightly" better...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Servers
And if you have ever spec'd out a fully loaded blade system (just one chassis, mind you) then you will see that virtualization isn't hurting the big 'D'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Smart Thinking
has professed to have said in this article. Not just because of my good fortune with this company but also I have seen him interviewed several times on television and he seems like a pretty decent guy to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Smart on virtualization, not so smart on netbooks
Yes, netbooks have small screens and the performance is far from amazing, but so what?? Nobody said they are supposed to be good replacements for desktop PCs! Or even 14" or 15.4" laptops. They are different products, and good for different things.
In fact Dell could say the same things about average laptops compared with a desktop PC. Does that mean laptops are useless? Laptops have mobility, desktops don't. Netbooks take that further by being smaller, cheaper, and having longer battery life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hypocrite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hypocrite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Very awkward title
Michael Dell Recognizes Blocking What Customers Want To Protect Your Own Biz Model Is Dumb
"""
Mike, sorry to be pedantic, but it took me about three re-reads of that title to finally comprehend what you were trying to say. Might I suggest adding three words:
Michael Dell Recognizes That Blocking What Customers Want In Order To Protect Your Own Biz Model Is Dumb
On topic, good to see someone as high up as Michael Dell recognizing this simple truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]