Gartner Finally Realizes That Social Networking At Work Isn't Evil
from the could-have-found-that-elsewwhere-earlier... dept
It wasn't that long ago that Gartner was spreading FUD about the use of social networking tools at work, saying it didn't think the technology would be beneficial within corporations. It seems that Gartner has a new tune. Just a week or so after we pointed out how silly it was to block social networks at work, Gartner has come out and said the same thing, pointing out that such blocks don't really work, and most people now use such tools for important forms of communication, which would be harmed by IT decisions to cut them off. Of course, some of us have been saying that for years. Good thing companies are paying billions to Gartner for its advice, right?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: social networking
Companies: gartner
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Talk until you a blue in the face...
It is only now that businesses are using Facebook and such that the social networking value is seen to both the business mgt/owners and IT departments.
Until you have major companies invested in a meaningful way, you weren't going to get any traction on the argument of not blocking what appears to be the new water cooler to management. Now that it is seen as the new Golf Course or pick your analogy, it is A-OK with management but they need a study to justify it :)!
Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gartner?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gartner?
http://www.gartner.com/technology/about.jsp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gartner?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Gartner?
You realize he copy/pasted the summary from Gartner's "About" page (which he linked to) to be helpful, whereas you're just an anonymous jackass, Right?
/sigh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone's a little jealous...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Heh. Not at all. I'm never jealous of success. But I can point out how dumb it is that people pay them so much money for such bad advice.
What's wrong with that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some companies embrace these sites
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Best Practice" != Best Solution
If it were easier to fire people for under-performing, I would say sure, open up the services wherever there isn't a security policy in place that would dictate otherwise. For mid to large size corporations, they probably need to decide whether or not to open to social networking based on their employees' use patterns and experiences.
Social networking is good, but its also a form of crack for some people, who create burden for their teammates. Work ethic should always come before being socially connected, and for many in the workforce this is unfortunately not the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The fine line....
I would argue that this is definitely one of those situations where there is a fine line between wasting time at work, and helping the company by contributing the the common good. Not many people understand that when they pass through the corporate proxy gateway, they are logged to the teeth. These logs in the hands of a good admin can be broken down in seconds to find out what employees are actually doing online.
I once held the Sysadmin gig along with a management job (multitasking) for a small business before venturing out on my own. I was actually quite lenient in that I allowed people to do what they generally wanted, provided that their work was done in a timely manner. But there were those who simply couldn't help themselves. What cracked me up most, was watching the light above "offender's" cubicle change with a couple of mouse clicks as someone walked in that direction, only to change back after the person walked on by.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyone who believes they can stop everyone from doing something is sorely misinformed.
examples:
1. The U.S. War on Drugs (That worked out well eh)
2. Newspapers putting up pay walls (Still waiting to see if that will work out, my bets on people flocking to the free alternatives)
3. Movies/music concerning file sharing (**AA still haven't stopped that one from happening, and doesn't appear to be dropping anytime soon)
This blocking social networks on company networks is just another dead end. How to get around it? People are just using there smart phones now, to browse, and do whatever they like. So it really hasn't stopped anything.
Hell I even don't even use ITunes for my ipod, cause I refuse to be locked down to it, and want to be able to transfer my files, back and forth to any computer I choose.
What is it they say in Hackers: "You may stop me, but you can't stop us all!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
On another note, it's no surprise businesses are seeing the advantages to using social networking technology. In the end, one of the purposes of social networking is to provide a platform for people with common interests to interact and exchange information.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Social CRM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-
[ link to this | view in chronology ]