Dear RIAA: It's Not 'Working Together As A Team' When It's Under Threat Of Regulation
from the do-these-guys-ever-make-sense dept
I've been trying not to respond to every RIAA blog post these days, but it's hard to let certain things go when they so rarely make any sense. For example, RIAA President Cary Sherman recently talked up the new regulations that force colleges and universities to "take proactive steps" to stop file sharing. He goes on to make it sound like universities decided to do this in the spirit of "teamwork" with the RIAA, rather than because they risked serious financial consequences under the law for not complying. He also leaves out the fact that tons of colleges and universities are pissed off and complaining about how much time, effort and money they're wasting on this just because Sherman and his friends still don't seem able to embrace modern music business models. Colleges and universities have enough to worry about without the government forcing them to act as the RIAA's police force. If it were truly about teamwork, Cary, you wouldn't have had to spend so much time getting Congress to pass a law to force them to do this.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cary sherman, filtering, lobbying, riaa, universities
Companies: riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Anyone else unsurprised?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If ever there were a sign they desire no feedback on their horrid ideas or atrocious actions...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whats funny is ....
"This growth has diverted a full-time staff position at Information Security Office just to process all of the complaints. Creation of a new full-time position for turning on and off connections may not be far in the future."
RIAA has just taken in excess of 100,000 USD from the university budget .... why isnt RIAA thinking of the children!!
Did a little reasearch through Stanford, UC Berkeley, Bowling Green State University, InfoSec (Information Security Office) web sites and network policy sites. Heres what I found VPN software is either allowed specifically or not disallowed, the bandwidth utilization on these networks is continuing to grow. Students at these university are blogging about using web sites like http://www.freemooviesonline.com/ for movies and similar sites for mp3's. VPN is also a topic of discussion .....
... and so the evolution continues ... where oh where will it end ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA Website
1. When you go online and download songs without permission, you are stealing; 2. One credible analysis by the Institute for Policy Innovation concludes that global music piracy causes $12.5 billion of economic losses every year, 71,060 U.S. jobs lost, a loss of $2.7 billion in workers' earnings, and a loss of $422 million in tax revenues, $291 million in personal income tax and $131 million in lost corporate income and production taxes; 3. the record industry was able to discontinue its broad-based end user litigation program. ; 4. Q: What would the RIAA like people to know about the lawsuit program now that it has ended? A:The program was designed to educate fans about the law, the consequences of breaking the law, and raise awareness about all the great legal sites in the music marketplace.; 5. Q: Is it still illegal to download music on P2P sites like LimeWire, BitTorrent and Ares? A:Absolutely; 6. Q: How is downloading music different from copying a personal CD? A:Record companies have never objected to someone making a copy of a CD for their own personal use.; 7. Q: Should devices such as CD burners be outlawed since they are an easy way of making illegal copies of others creative efforts? A: Devices and technology are not the problem. It’s when people use technology to break the law that we take issue. Again and again, we have embraced the technological advances that have allowed millions upon millions of people around the world to enjoy the music we create.
1. It's not theft, it's infringement, not the same thing
2. Bogus numbers as has been debunked on techdirt many times
3. no, it hasn't stopped, as debunked on techdirt
4. Was not designed for "education" it was designed as a scare tactic (which I guess in a twisted way you could call education, so OK I'll give them that one back)
5. No there are plenty of free and legal music downloads available via P2P, so just because some music is illegal to download, not all of it is as implied in the statement
6. Yes, they have. both the RIAA and the MPAA have fought for years to hamstring / break recording technology
7. I agree with the first sentence, however the second statement is an outright lie. If they could figure out a way to stay back in the cassete deck (non-recordable) or better yet vinyl album days and make money they would. They have vehemently opposed every new technology that came along until overwhelming consumer demand forced them to adapt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright infringement is never cool, or badass, or rock and roll. Don't break the law kids, even if your idols do.
Stay in school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
that is if your college can still afford it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I just noticed that it has been replaced by a still slightly silly, but overall much less absurd, version. I wonder if they just got fed up by being an industry's mouthpiece.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It seems to me that this is an improvement to the current system, and not a step backward.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There's nothing wrong with rightly pointing out that it's agencies like RIAA that forced through the egregious abomination that is the DMCA in the first place. The solution is not to to make the schools into RIAA's police force, the solution is to get rid of the DMCA or, barring that, at least fix the worst aspects of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
en
int eth 45
shut
wr me
What a fun thing to do all day!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slippery Slope
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What I personally have a problem with is that I can get in trouble for file sharing at my uni even if the files I share are perfectly legal and non-copyrighted. The policy tends to be "shoot first, ask questions later" so while it would get cleared up eventually, I'd rather not have to bother with it in the first place. Why do they have this sort of policy? Why, laws like this of course. Best play it safe, after all (which coincidentally is what I was told when I asked "but isn't sharing files legally ok?").
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
True!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]