Oh Look: Hollywood Doesn't Need To Break Your TV To Release PPV Movies Early
from the who-would-have-thunk-it? dept
For a while now, the MPAA and the major movie studios have been asking the FCC for permission to break your TV and DVR by enabling "selectable output control," which would block the recording of certain movies. The MPAA's claim for why they needed this is to add another "window" for releasing movies as video on demand prior to them being released on DVD. But that makes no sense. As we pointed out, when they first made this claim, there is absolutely nothing stopping them from releasing these movies earlier for VOD. There's nothing to stop them from doing so -- and it's not like SOC would actually block the movies from being online. Every movie ends up online around the same time (usually before) it gets into the theaters, so these movies would all be available for file sharing prior to the VOD release anyway. The MPAA keeps saying that it simply can't release the movies earlier without this form of DRM, but it appears that the studios own actions prove that we were right, and the MPAA was lying. Public Knowledge is pointing out that Warner Bros. has released two recent movies for VOD prior to DVD, even as the MPAA is still insisting that it's simply impossible. Oops.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, hollywood, selectable output control, soc, tv
Companies: warner bros.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh No!
No, wait... the other thing: Completely expected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will the FCC Care
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I haven't ranted in a while...
And now that I'm older, I find that adult life just isn't that different. I don't expect all people to be all honest all the time....but hey, how about not just taking a ginormous steaming dump on my shoes? Examples abound...
1. MPAA says they can't release movies VOD prior to DVD release because of piracy. Turns out pirated copies appear BEFORE DVDs and then, just to put another corn in that shit they took on my shoes, Warner Bros. does what they say they couldn't do. Awesome.
2. Bush tells me there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Every other country save Britain tells him he's nuts. We go in...no WMDs. Bush says he was wrong, but that it doesn't matter....[FACEPALM!]. Well, yeah it fucking does matter asshole, because all the other bullshit reasons to invade those fuckers existed for the past thirty years or so. You know, back when we were dealing arms to them to fight the Iranians, who have to have been laughing their collective shrouded asses off at us.
3. Ah, don't worry! We've got hope and change. Wait, what? No change? What about hope then? Mr. Obama you said you'd make government transparent. Oh? Not so much? Well surely you'll repeal that idiotic head in the sand "Don't ask, don't tell" law, like you promised. Oh? Not going to do that either...got it. Well, hey, at least I can rest my hat on the fact that you didn't allow any lobbyists...into...your....DAMMIT! Son of a bitch, can I at least get a Cuban cigar you presidential fuck!!??
Lesson: don't listen to authority...ever, because they suck at life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I haven't ranted in a while...
Yeah? How old are you? Like 17 now?
"Son of a bitch, can I at least get a Cuban cigar you presidential fuck."
No, but you can go to the Olympics in Vancouver and get them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I haven't ranted in a while...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I haven't ranted in a while...
That'll be $199 for the use of my soapbox.
And I know it's mine, because I disabled the SOC, painted works created by someone else, and it's pink.
Send payment, via money order, to...
I did chuckle. The "rest my hat" line did it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's funny
On a somewhat unrelated note; When is the new Star Trek movie coming out on Blu-Ray? The window between pulling it from the theater and putting it out to buy is so large I've lost track.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's funny
I wasn't able to get to the theater while it was there, but if the blu-ray had been for sale they would have gotten my money much earlier.
I also got that tweet and did send a letter in, but I didn't use any of their text.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Citizen, Dark Helmet whines about everybody, in case you haven't noticed. The point was rage at authority mouthpieces that say one thing and do another.
You'll notice I mentioned another prez in there too...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This seeming preoccupation with "I WANT IT NOW!" does appear to be a bit silly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sure, I'm the only person who sells food for hundreds of miles but I mean, a business is a business.
My rules. Rotten food is better than no food at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah? How old are you? Like 17 now?
Funny guy. Funny. Age=intelligence now? NO. Let's try again, age contradicts true statements now? NO.
In short, silence please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Plus he's off by something close to a decade. Eh, I probably shouldn't have strayed that far from the topic anyway.
This no coffee thing is killing me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
1. Wes Anderson movies: artistic but painful to watch (Royal Tannenbaums made me feel bad throughout the entire movie, even the funny parts)
2. Michael Gondry movies: I've actually seen more of his commercials than his movies. Be Kind Rewind had to be the only Jack Black movie I've seen that was truly, truly awful...
3. Sushi: Are you kidding me? It's AWESOME. The best part of the sushi experience, especially if you live in a metropolitan area with a great deal of ethnic diversity, is tasting all of the authentic variances. Dragon rolls are by far my favorite.
4. Natural Medicine: Also known as naturopathy, is simply too large a step in the right direction from pharmacological medicine. Allowing the body to do it's job, good. Pumping it full of sugar pills that often have the kind of side effects that make me shit my pants when I read about them. Refusing surgery because it isn't natural? Just plain stupid...
5. Film Festivals: Never been to one, but after reading about some of Kevin Smith's escapades in the book I won right here on TechDirt, I'm looking into attending one of these days.
I'll await your results output with a quiverng parineum....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So is 80% of the country's. What's your point?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't particularly hate Obama any more than our other recent presidents, but I see you haven't seen the polls recently...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@wnyght: I didn't think so either, and still don't.
I just think he likes to correctly put his accusers in their place..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's good that he's of age.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I just think he likes to correctly put his accusers in their place.."
It's actually much more simple than that: I enjoy talking.
And the folks here, even the ones that disagree with me and/or poke fun (particularly when they're funny) both educate and entertain me.
Hopefully somewhere in all my crap I do the same for somebody else occassionally.
Enough of the love fest, and enough of the me...I've derailed this thread far to much already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shill Reeducation Program
This seeming preoccupation with "I WANT IT NOW!" does appear to be a bit silly."
You are obviously not a business person selling a product to consumers. Lets do a quick outline that might help illuminate the point:
- You can offer any product to the consumer you want
- The consumer can purchase your product if they want
- You can make (most) any rules you want regarding the sale of your product to consumers (that arent against consumer laws that is)
- Consumer can ignore your product if you make it too difficult/onerous/unfair/expensive to obtain it
See, its not about entitlement (tho there is a HUGE problem with that in the world today) its about when you have a product for sale, you have to offer what the consumer WANTS, or the consumer will a) do without or b) get it somewhere else. Just because you CAN do something (release windows, DRM, suing downloaders) doesnt mean its makes GOOD BUSINESS to do so.
It is vitally important to understand this difference. If you dont give people a GOOD REASON TO BUY, they wont. Period. Ignore what the consumer demands at your peril, and die accordingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shill Reeducation Program
"If you do not like the idea of what studios would like to implement, why not simply avoid the use of VOD? Go see a movie in a theater and enjoy the social experience, wait till the DVD comes out, wait till is appears on HBO, or wait until in is shown on a network broadcast."
It would appear as if they are not really interested in selling movies. Lets go through those statements one by one:
1) Avoid the use of VOD.
What? Are you serious? Here you have an excellent, low cost distribution method and you are telling people to avoid it? I thought businesses were usually pretty happy when something comes along that reduces their distribution costs.
2) Go see a movie in the theater and enjoy the social experience.
Have you been to the theater lately? I can have a much more enjoyable social experience at home with some friends (the movie isn't even necessary).
3) Wait till it comes out on DVD, HBO, or network TV.
Hollywood spends a lot of money advertising (approximately 1/3-1/2 of the budget for any movie is advertising). Most of this money is spent building hype prior to it's release in theaters. It is often successful in getting people interested in the film, but many people who become interested in the film either don't want to or can't see it in the theaters. By the time it is available on DVD, HBO or Network TV, interest in it has completely worn off. So people who would have happily paid to purchase a DVD or pay for a download when it was first released are no longer interested in doing so by the time it is finally available. That seems like quite a waste of advertising dollars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you don't like it, start your own movie company, and release you own movies.
Have fun.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]