Congressional Study Says $42 Billion Could Be Raised By Legalizing Internet Gambling
from the that-might-be-useful-right-about-now dept
Ragaboo writes " A congressional report was recently released estimating that the regulation of Internet gambling could amount to around $42 billion in revenue for the U.S. government. Considering both the current financial climate and the fact (given the nature of the Internet) Americans are gambling online anyway, whether the government likes it or not, it seems like an incredible waste not to simply regulate the industry. Regulation provides much-needed funds, allows standards to be imposed and oversight to ensure safety, and also allows safety nets and safeguards to be forced to be put in place against underage and problem gamblers. As it currently stands, millions are playing online poker alone from within the United States (whether or not the government approves of it, which in an of itself isn't explicitly clear) and countless others are gambling, and yet every cent being made in that industry is going overseas."Indeed. Online gambling seems like one area where a regulated market would make a lot more sense than outright prohibition. Many other countries already do this, and it's really odd that the US continues to resist it. Many claim that it's really just an effort by the existing casinos to block out competition, but it would seem that those casinos would benefit greatly themselves by being able to offer their own online offerings. And, even with this new evidence, it looks like Congress is actually going in the opposite direction.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: online gambling
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well, yeah, the revenue on sales tax from congressmen alone would fund national healthcare!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, from a logistical, financial, and safety perspective, your argument makes sense. From the perspective of preserving culture, encouraging self-control and self-discipline, and supporting the essential human family unit, your argument breaks down. The question is, which is more important and in line with governmental duties? I'm not sure.
As far as illegal drugs, I don't think you can put them all in one group. Some drugs need to remain illegal. These would be the highly addictive, harmful, easily-overdosed, hard drugs: meth, cocaine, heroine, etc. Marijuana, however, falls more in line with alcohol and tobacco, and it should probably be legalized and regulated. I can see no real argument against that. I have little to no knowledge of available drugs, but if other drugs fall into the same category as marijuana, then they should probably be legalized and regulated, too.
As far as the original post, gambling is voluntary and not inherently harmful. With proper regulation, players would be much better off and better protected in a legal, regulated industry. Personally, I despise gambling, but that does not mean I have the right to control others' behavior. Just because it's legal does not mean I have to participate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"Citation Needed"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Citations, per Your Request
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NNR/is_2_35/ai _100736161/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/family-with-two-parents-better-for-all -study-claims-607339.html
I could go on and on, but my point was mainly to remind you that hegemon13's comment isn't pulled out of the ether.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Only in an age and a society where everything has become so thoroughly focused on self would anyone question whether family units are more stable and productive that a person alone, and whether a collection of stable family units is better for society than a chaotic mass of self-serving, undisciplined individuals.
It does not need a source or citation. It is in our DNA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"Prostitution can really impinge upon that family structure"
I don't think you can blame prostitution for the inability of some to control their sexual urges. The family unit is a great thing, but this sounds like the ever popular "save the children" argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Does that mean that those governments that allow state executions are perceived to approve of murder or manslaughter?
"Prostitution can really impinge upon that family structure."
No, spousal infidelity impinges upon that family structure. If you believe that prostitution impinges, then you can't support divorce. Yet, no one is suggesting that divorce be illegal to 'protect the family unit'.
"From the perspective of preserving culture, encouraging self-control and self-discipline, and supporting the essential human family unit, your argument breaks down."
How so? How does not legalizing prostitution encourage self-control and self discipline? I keep hearing how prostitution is 'one of the oldest professions on the earth'. Yet, thousands of years later, people still get married, have kids and live happy and fulfilling lives.
"These would be the highly addictive, harmful, easily-overdosed, hard drugs: meth, cocaine, heroine, etc"
Why would these drugs have to be illegal? There are many drugs that are just as harmful as the three you stated, yet, they are available with a prescription? If it is okay to legalize and regulate these drugs, why can't meth, cocaine and heroine be legalized and regulated?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The last response, however, is just not true. Sure. there are many drugs that can be as harmful, which is why they are only available by prescription, and only for SPECIFIC purposes. If risks of a drug outweigh its medical benefit, it is not made available at all. To equate legalizing dangerous recreational drugs, even with some regulation, with providing a controlled medical drug market is ridiculous. Even prescription drugs are only legal when used as directed for a specific purpose. There is no legal recreational prescription drug market. Because there is no substantial medical benefit to the drugs I mentioned above, there is no way that a risk vs. benefit analysis by the FDA would allow any of them to be sold. And even if a huge benefit were found, the drug would be available only in limited, medical circumstances.
So, you have still provided no reason why we should legalize those types of "hard" drugs. A tax profit is not reason enough, by any means.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Frankly, it doesn't matter if the US gov decided tomorrow to allow online gaming. The casinos are so far behind sites like Pokerstars, they have no chance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Holy carP!
Never thought we'd hear that level of competent thought come out of our Congress. Huh...
Now, let's try repeating the same sentence but inserting some words other than "gambling." Words like: marijuana, absinthe, prostitution...
Why, this could be a whole era of the gov doing a collective faceslap followed by statements like "Why are wasting money trying to stop it?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Holy carP!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Incumbent innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I swear it's the prostitutes themselves who are sponsoring anti-prostitution laws and public opinions. Helps keep the entry barrier into the profession high, thus reducing the availability of competition and, correspondingly, propping up the prices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Puritan Ethic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting.
The odds are 10:1 on black, 5:1 on red, and 2:1 on yellow.
This is the one time the House isn't in favor to win.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legalize it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's legalized...
Let's face it, if people want to gamble, they're going to do it.
How much healthcare can $42 billion buy?
As far as drugs and prostitution, that's a slippery slope. I believe it would definately curb illegal drug use - one, by offering a legal alternative without the fear associated with getting caught doing illegal drugs. Second, the abundance of legal drug cafes will drive the price of illegal drugs down to a point where the profits may not be worth the efforts for many drug dealers - after all, if they have less demand (since there are legal alternatives) and lower prices, the profits will be MUCH lower - plus, some of the money from the regulation of the drugs can go into illegal drug enforcement.
Prostitution is an interesting prospect. Despite the moral/religous ramifications, legalization would be VERY beneficial to both the working girls and their John's.
The girls benefit because they will likely get regular check-ups, possible benefits and other perks of being part of a REAL business. Not to mention, their safety factor improves a hundred-fold. Not only that, but now they are paying taxes (on some of it at least) so that's more income - taxing both the business and the individual.
There will still be a stigma with being a prostitute and being one will now be a matter of public record if you have to be licensed, so that may actually discourage some girls.
Licensing would also cut back on underage prostitution and the forcing of foreign women into prostitution.
It would also cut back on illegal prostitution since the legalized prostitution businesses will be advertising in legitimate corners, the illegal business will be easier to pickout on things like craigslist, etc.
Billions and billions of income - we'd have our debt "worked off" in no time... pun intended.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's legalized...
Wrong. Here in California, where we have legal medical marijuana, the legal dispeseries charge the same price that street vendors do for say 1/8 ounce. At the dispensery there is no volume discount, no matter how much you buy. At the street vendor the price gets better as the volume of the buy goes up. The 'legal' stuff is more expensive at any amount over 1/8 ounce.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's legalized...
with a more open marketplace, there is always going to be forces driving prices down.
And remember that medical marijuana is, in theory if not always fact, meant to treat all those disorders and troubles, not really a market of cost-conscious shoppers and bargain hunters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Give with one hand, take with the other
As an example, we know that smoking doesn't hurt just the smokers themselves, but also those around them. Secondhand smoke can also cause illness. In Canada, there are heavy tobacco taxes, which (we think) offset the healthcare and social care (what happens when a parent dies of cancer?). So, there's a clear revenue source through the tobacco taxation, but there are other costs attached to allowing it to continue.
Surely there has to be a 'cost' to this gain in revenue. Cost to administer and license these business? Legal and taxation enforcement? Bankruptcies and debt support?
I would hope that report considers it's not all rainbows and lollipops, with only a fiscal upside.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Give with one hand, take with the other
None. Those consequences already exist in the 'illegal' realm of online gambling.
Legalizing online gambling allows the government to place controls that currently do not exist. I'm not saying that legalizing will solve all problems or eliminate all consequences. But it will help in mitigating many of the problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
legalize internet gambling?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I mean, really, the money comes from the same place, no good or service is exchanged for it, and it is exactly the same sort of drain on the economy. Except that the collection service is really inefficient, probably tied to the mob, and tends to tax the poor and uneducated disproportionately.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not true. $42 billion is about 1.5% of the budget you quoted, which is a pretty massive chunk, considering that it comes from only one industry.
"I mean, really, the money comes from the same place, no good or service is exchanged for it, and it is exactly the same sort of drain on the economy."
Except that people are already doing it, and that money is draining into unregulated foreign companies instead. Plus, it is voluntary, where a tax is not. It does not "tax" the poor. They choose to take part. If the government can keep taxes on individuals lower by taxing an industry that people willingly give money to, I am all for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Woodstock supports Legalization
Woodstock Universe supports legalization of Marijuana.
Add vote in our poll about legalization at http://www.woodstockuniverse.com.
Current poll results…97% for legalization, 3% against.
Listen to RADIO WOODSTOCK 69 which features only music from the original Woodstock era (1967-1971) and RADIO WOODSTOCK with music from the original Woodstock era to today’s artists who reflect the spirit of Woodstock. Watch Woodstock TV.
Peace, love, music, one world,
RFWoodstock
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's Turn the table on US Congress
God help the internet gambling industry through this time of suffering due to US Congress's stupid new law making some offshore gaming banking transactions criminal.
It's time to turn the table on US congresspeople who create laws designed to make people suffer. Let's throw them in jail, for the first time in history. Are there any judges or attorneys who can help to make this happen? We are already backed by the World Trade Organization, for those who are aware of this. Seems like Barack Obama would also be on our side.
Let's finally laugh at our stupid authority figures who lack the love required in order to communicate patiently with others. These figures are the ones who fight and get away with it because they can track down and rough-up those who fight them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Online Gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]