Companies Realizing That Content Is Advertising Via Web Series

from the well,-it's-a-start dept

Tue, Nov 24th 2009 9:21pm — Mike Masnick

The NY Times has an article about the rise of online "web series" shows that are suddenly popular, noting that many brands are creating such things as a way to produce interesting content online while getting some attention for their brand. It's yet another realization that advertising is content and content is advertising. The key point, that many say they realize (and hopefully they live up to it) is that none of this works if the content itself sucks. So they're working on these shows with a focus on making them good and enjoyable to watch first, and including the sponsorship as a secondary part of the effort. I'm sure there may be some backlash over this idea, but it actually makes quite a lot of sense. It gets more good content out there, and helps brands get themselves noticed and remembered not for intrusive and annoying advertising, but for sponsoring something cool.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: advertising, brands, content, webisodes

13 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Alias (profile), 24 Nov 2009 @ 9:37pm

A great example of this
is the Milkdonkulous and the Battle for Milkquarious content on the web right now (http://milkquarious.com/#/rock-opera), which is not only hilarious, but has the whole 'milk' message which is done in an entertaining way with an over-the-top, 70's-styled theme throughout the video. It's worth a watch if you haven't seen it before. This hits squarely on what Mike is trying to say here, 'Content is advertising, etc'. -Alias
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
p0ps, 25 Nov 2009 @ 3:15am

Web - TV
As a model, this seems to be the same as early TV or radio before it. The advertisers create a show and sponsor it. To gain audience, the advertisers necessarily needed to focusing on the content, the industry grew into a split between content creators and advertising. Some creative teams creating the show content, some creating the advertising content. When it was successful, the audience grew to love the show, tolerated the advertising. Is there anyway for this to be different?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pjhenry1216 (profile), 25 Nov 2009 @ 3:28am

I always enjoyed 30 Rock's over the top, in your face product placement. They always did it in such a way that it was actually part of a joke. While they didn't try to hide it in any way, quite the opposite in fact, it also wasn't intrusive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Nov 2009 @ 5:05am

Yes, content is advertising - even the news.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Nov 2009 @ 5:55am

It doesn't work if you have nothing to sell up to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Nov 2009 @ 12:20pm
  
  Re:
  Uh...so?
  
  Why would be you spamming sites with banner ads and filling inboxes with spam mail if you didn't have anything to sell?
  
  The point is that the market has become overly saturated with "ignorable" ads, and to stand out you need to create something that people want to talk about, and want to go looking for.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pete Austin, 25 Nov 2009 @ 7:07am

Advertising CAN work if the content itself sucks
For example, half the marketing in a typical national election is dreadful attack adverts. I mean production quality, not morals. These do nothing to boost the client who paid for them, more the opposite, but they are worthwhile because they damage the opponent more. Here's a classic of the genre.
http://www.viswiki.com/en/Revolving_Door_%28television_advertisement%29.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Social Networking Software (profile), 25 Nov 2009 @ 7:10am

With more and more people getting their "media" fix from mobile devices and social networking websites, these Webisodes are the logical next step in entertainment/advertising. They are also being used to create "hype and buzz" for new product launches.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vinnie, 25 Nov 2009 @ 8:34am

Back to the roots
Great point by p0ps. I listen to a lot of old time radio, so that was the first thing I thought of too. Though the sponsor usually just got a few plugs and their name on the title, even some those old radio programs that overtly doubled as ads for the product proved successful, especially done in a short serial format.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gene Cavanaugh, 25 Nov 2009 @ 8:39am

Advertising is content, etc.
Wow! To me, if I find there is something I want, and it is a good cost-benefit tradeoff, I will eventually find it - in fact, that is how my IP business works; I don't advertise, never have, probably never will. However, while I don't get in, "fleece a sucker", and get out again (the apparent purpose of much advertising), my business continues to grow and grow.
Took years to kick it off, but my client base is REALLY solid; they know they are getting the "best for less", and it just gets better and better (for them and for me!).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Nov 2009 @ 2:44pm

BMW called, and wants their idea back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Nov 2009 @ 6:28pm
  
  Re:
  Shame they didn't patent it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
San Francisco web content writing company, 20 Feb 2010 @ 4:56am

Content is part of the real scope in the online world. we must offer and provide and they will buy for us. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]