Rupert Murdoch: Feds Should Stay Out Of News Business, Except, Of Course To Smack Down Google For Sending Me Traffic
from the really? dept
Rupert Murdoch stopped by at an FTC workshop on the future of journalism to say that the federal government should "stay out" of regulating the journalism business. Except, in the same speech he said exactly the opposite. What he meant was that he didn't want the government to get in the business of funding journalism. Yet, in the very same speech he did say that the government shouldn't allow Google to link to his news stories, calling it "theft" yet again. Again, he didn't explain why he hasn't blocked Google if it's actually "theft." Not surprisingly, compounding these contradictions, he failed to mention (or perhaps recognize?) that the sites he owns do plenty of aggregating themselves. I've been told, however, that Arianna Huffington is making that point, though I wonder if Rupert stuck around to hear it. Update: Huffington has published her speech, which does a very nice job making the point.Other points made by Murdoch include the bizarre claim that "advertising is dead" as a model to support journalism. You would think that someone who has lived through a bunch of ad market cycles wouldn't extrapolate from just a short period, but that appears to be what Murdoch is doing. About the only other explanation for all of this is that he's simply trying to confuse and throw off both the competition and the federal government -- but at some point someone should directly call him on his various contradictions and confusion.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aggregators, copyright, fair use, journalism, rupert murdoch, search engines
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Come on
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Come on
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Come on
Murdoch and his news empire literally mean nothing to Google. The only reason they even appear on Google is because they exist on the internet. That's it. Otherwise, those websites are just a spec of storage space that happen to be relevant to a small percentage of search terms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We should also listen to Rupert Murdoch. We are raising a generation of thieves. Society should pay for everything.
"Even the free things?"
Yes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
>>"Even the free things?"
>>Yes.
I am currently working on a price structure for the air you breath.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What Rupert Murdoch *really* wants
The democracies of the world are plunging more and more into what has been called "reverse socialism," where the means of production own the people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rupert's Struggle
It was interesting because it seemed to allude to information and even reporter sharing between different mastheads. Rupert's struggle is that people somewhat know, and it's recently been proven that that his stories are somewhat altered to sell a preconceived narrative.
Fox News, and potentially other NewsCorp outfits unfortunately won't be able to partake in such an information-sharing, virtual newsroom because it would more than likely break the preconceived narrative.
Peer review and peer collaboration is the mortal enemy of the preconceived narrative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I get it!
He doesn't want to take risk for long term gains, he doesn't understand that other search engines will take Google's place even if he did kill it, and he doesn't see that every newspaper removed from the conversation is just another opportunity for someone else (newspaper or otherwise) to step in and fill the gap. In his world, there is only Google and him and these one way viewer eyeballs and no one else currently exists or ever will exist.
I think I finally follow his misguided logic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does anyone know if his papers have RSS feeds?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
proving time and time again why it is so vitally important to not be hittin the sauce while posting on the interwebs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Truth is, I write jokes for a living. This current joke is 25 pages long has a title page labeled "Deployment Document", but it's really a warped version of "The Aristocrats". It's real great stuff, and makes me laugh uncontrollably.
I need an "out" for the daily fiction I am paid to come up with. I've often thought the people I work with take their brains out of their heads and play with them, as if that's all they're good for.
Sorry if I got any on ya.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huffington FTW
"So it's a false metaphor. And if you start from a false premise, you will inevitably be led to a false conclusion. Or, to put it another way, if you chug-a-lug too many of old media's metaphoric beers, you will end up staggering down the street of illogical thinking and banging into the lamp post of wrong revenue models."
and
"The information superhighway is a busy thoroughfare and there's going to be some road kill along the way. But only among those who insist on merging into traffic riding a horse and buggy."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obviously
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"advertising is dead"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "advertising is dead"
It occurred to me all these authority figures above the age of 40 just get more and more out of touch with reality everyday.
Ironic considering how many "reality shows" are actually broadcast from his network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not a psychiatrist, but...
I hate to make ad hominem attacks, and I'm not a psychiatrist, but the more I hear/read of what Mr. Murdoch says, the more convinced I become that the poor man is losing his grip.
Doesn't he have boards of directors or advisors or somebody to sorta guide him along? If nothing else, get him out of the spotlight. Regardless of what people may think of the various media organizations he owns/controls, he's making them lose credibility by association.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wants free money
Before internet, they were charging huge amounts to place ad in their papers.
Nobody dared to say, it was stealing.
Internet changed how many/all businesses are doing their business online and offline (brickAndMortar).
BUT not print media, they refused to embrace it.
Now they are paying the price for it.
What will be the best model?
I think it will be trial and error, like dot com boom.
"The bravest and smartest will succeed."
The problem is 'they' are putting too much importance on 'creating news'.
Nowadays everybody:
- can listen to police scanner,
- have camera and you tube account,
- tweeter for ever,
- post blogs,
- and everyone is 'so called' reporter now days.
spelling errors are everywhere.......
Greedy bastard......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rupert Murdoch's War On Journalism
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
house
[ link to this | view in chronology ]