Fair Isaac Doesn't Get To Trademark Its Credit Score Scale
from the you-get-a-653-in-creative-trademark-abuse dept
Eric Goldman has the details on a case involving Fair Isaac and its (failed) attempt to claim a trademark on the infamous credit scores it offers. Obviously, you can't just trademark numbers, but Fair Isaac tried to make the case that the scale it uses for your credit rating scores, 300-850, is protectable. The jury tossed that out, and the judge summarized:"the jury returned a verdict finding that the alleged '300-850' mark was not a valid, protectable trademark because the term '300-850”'has not acquired secondary meaning."Separately, in the meat of the case, the court rejected claims by Fair Isaac that Experian and Trans Union infringed on its trademarks with their Google AdWords advertising, noting that (beyond the fact that 300-850 isn't trademarkable), there was no confusion on the part of consumers who saw the ads. Fair Isaac had offered up an "expert" witness to claim otherwise, but the court simply said that the expert "lacks credibility."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: credit scores, trademark
Companies: fair isaac
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Guess he ought to pick himself up a pirate hat and a guitar, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"... the term '300-850”'has not acquired secondary meaning."
Does this imply that had it acquired secondary meaning a TM would be valid ??? Many years ago Intel was told that 486 was not something they could TM and it had acquired secondary meaning. Go figure. TM, patent, whatever should not be allowed on any number.
btw, That Anders Celsius guy is really bugging me with his different numbering scheme, I think I'll sue his ass.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Muhammad will TM "786."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FICO destroys lives, and blights the American Dream
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It will be after its court performance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]