Microsoft Cracks Down On Windows Piracy In China... So Pirating Group Offers Up Ubuntu That Looks Like XP
from the happy-microsoft dept
It's been pointed out before how much Microsoft has benefited from having its operating system and office suites "pirated," in that it helped make Microsoft a de facto standard, that created lock-in and network effects, that helped make Microsoft into the massively successful company it is today. Even Bill Gates has famously said:"And as long as they're going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade."Except... of course, Microsoft has been pushing hard to "stop" that kind of "piracy" in China, and it may be having an unintended effect. Slashdot points us to the news that a group that had been offering pirated copies of Windows is now offering a copy of Ubuntu Linux, designed to look just like Windows XP. So, congrats, Microsoft, in "stopping" some piracy in China, you may just be driving users to Linux instead.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, linux, piracy, ubuntu, windows, windows xp
Companies: microsoft
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Interesting Trends...
Sadly, I think initially that locking down software provides a quick revenue boost to companies that use this method and have a popular product. This in turn leads most companies to think that if they just lock it down further than can squeeze the market and get the maximum revenue from it. While this may be true in the short run and good for this quarter type of thing it would seem short sighted at best.
I think there are some extremely bright folks at Microsoft and they probably believe that it was time for adjustment in IP enforcement in China. In the end, after all it is a balancing act.
Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Interesting Trends...
Funny thing, I was thinking the same thing about the way the record labels, movie studios, and certain nations are handling things. People either find cheaper products, feel threatened, want nothing to do with you, complain, or revolt, and it never ends up like the companies or nations plan.
Its all about a loop of fear, rationalizing, and denial. They fear and say if we do "this thing", what ever this thing is, things will work out. They rationalize even the slightest good news. Then they deny that what they planned didnt work, just long enough to come up with the next "this thing" ... and rinse, lather, repeat ... each time frustration sets in and the planned "this thing" is more extreme.
Its a feedback loop all information middlemen and IP types are currently going through.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Interesting Trends...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
The rest of what you said you probably just restated after reading it somewhere else, and there's little real point in addressing it - suffice to say, it gets adressed pretty satisfactorily many times a day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
You don't have to do ANYTHING on the command line any more.
In fact, Ubuntu is so good at this point the only thing keeping me from switching to it completely is that World of Warcraft won't run on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
http://www.wowwiki.com/World_of_Warcraft_functionality_on_Wine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
And yes, it is an emulator. Even the developers admit it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
http://www.winehq.org/myths#slow
If you want to add to it or customise it, there is the easy to find and obviously labelled Software Centre. Changing theme is a matter of right clicking he desktop > change background, or System > Preferences > Appearance.
Unless your idea of customisation involves more fundamental problems and tasks like severe driver issues or a completely broken system, then please tell me where you'd need to use the command line to customise and add to Ubuntu, assuming a reasonable range if things covered in "customise and add"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
What is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
...I USED TO primarily use Windows...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
Yes, there are a number of items that can be done through the command line on Linux. But that is the same for all of the other OS's. Even the new Win7 has gone back to most of the maintenance items being done through the new powershell command line because, the overhead of writing everything inside a Gui based program is too slow. Microsoft is pushing for all of the software developers to do the same thing. I know that because I just came back from a convention where they were stressing to use the powershell as much as possible for the back end of gui apps.
But, just like Windows, Linux has a GUI to do almost any task that needs to be done. Yes, a number of drivers do require editing a file or running a command. But that is only due to the developers for that device don't want to take the time and resources to try to package thier driver for the large variety of linux distro's out there.
That is not an issue caused by the Linux OS, it is caused by the hardware companies that are developing the drivers. With Linux becoming more popular for the standard user, it will be just a matter of time till someone develops a better packaging tool to use that will make it easier for the hardware vendors to pass on drivers to the users.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
Things have moved on since the 1992 version of Red Hat. The last machine I installed Linux on didn't require the command line for anything. Do keep up, dear boy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
I tried Ubuntu over a year ago, and I was able to install dozens of drivers for hardware not designed to work with Linux (video cards & wifi cards) without having to build or compile anything. And the only reason I sometimes went to through the command line is because it's quicker than a GUI (and I could copy & paste instructions instead of following menu trees & image-based directions).
If you had to build and compile anything, then you were doing it wrong. You should only need to compile anything if you are customizing Linux. I've used 4 different distros and have never had to compile a thing unless I was installing a very obscure program.
Installing programs & drivers is actually significantly easier in Ubuntu than Windows, because you can install almost any application or driver directly from within Linux without having to go outside and do it manually. All installation, builds, compiles, downloads dependencies, and customization and initialization is handled by the OS itself. It actually does more of the work for you than Windows does.
I've installed a robust OS environment that handles all audio/video files, internet surfing, office productivity, and a dozen games ... without ever having to download a file directly. It's all handled within Ubuntu's software repository. And without me having to manually build or compile a single thing.
And WINE ... is not an emulator. WINE is an implementation of the Windows API calls, but it doesn't emulate Windows. It's an application layer that redirects or translates API calls. Not to mention, traditionally you emulate HARDWARE. So, you wouldn't have a Windows emulator, but you'd have an x86 emulator that you would install Windows in to. Since WINE is not an emulator, a copy of Windows is not necessary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
heck most of them that i know don't use the gui at all, as soon as the os opens they shortcut to the terminal.
android seams to be getting it right though, but i'm not holding my breath
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
Linux & Ubuntu can be completely administered and used without ever touching the command line. Just that GUIs are easier to use, not faster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
WINE:
Requires no copy of Windows, installs applications directly into Linux so that they can be run as native Linux applications.
VMWare:
An x86 emulator that requires the user to install a copy of Windows (or another OS) onto its virtual machine where all applications must be run within the OS installed within VMWare.
Maybe demonstrating the differences there would clear it up? WINE allows Windows applications to run as native Linux applications ... VMWare and emulators do not, requiring they be launched first and then the applications are run through them separately.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
It is not cumbersome, and it is not only for tech savvy folks. My grandma uses it (!) and even says she prefers it to Windows 7. You don't need the command line -- everything can be done through the GUI these days (including installing drivers).
Did you just call my grandma an elitist snob??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
I read a complain earlier that with their vm they had to have windows. Well, YEAH. You need a copy of windows (?).
I use virtual box and I don't have these wine-specific tweak issues. I rarely use windows, but when I do, its there when I need it. No hassles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
The fact is, it's 90% there. It can only get better with time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not Going to Reduce Piracy of Real Windows
With the current Product Activation lockdown, DRM lockdown, UEFI lockdown, monthly subscription lockdown, Metro advertisement garbage lockdown, Cortana lockdown, forced updates lockdown...
They are very, very close to being un-usable.
Making Linux the clear champion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This article is not researched at all by anyone anywhere
As you can see, it does not look at all like windows XP out of the box(it looks like Gnome). I've seen this article posted on like 20 websites and not a single one bothered even checking the single most important fact that the thing looks a damn bit like XP by default. Their website claims "Windows XP operating habits, allowing you to quickly start with Linux" (loose translation), the screenshot on their site is a screenshot of the real Windows XP.
You could theme this OS to look more like Windows XP just like you can with pretty much any modern Linux Distro. This is not news.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This article is not researched at all by anyone anywhere
That looks more like XP to me than Gnome.
Windows XP
Gnome
YLMF OS (new Chinese thingy)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ubuntu linux
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ubuntu linux
Yeah? That's interesting. How so?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ubuntu linux
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
psh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, 98% correct - I did have some issues getting my Radeon to work under Ubuntu properly - but keep in mind, it's because of the crap drivers from AMD/ATI - NOT Ubuntu. The Nvidia drivers work well, from what I hear.
Windows is not isolated from driver issues either - and you also have to consider, Windows is running about 20 more services than it really needs to.
I, in fact, use the command line to shut down all that crap before playing games, and system performance jumps way up - extra 10-25% Frame rate, depending on the game.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm going to do this VERY soon.
Load up Windows XP - as stripped as you can get it to play games - OS, Drivers, DirectX - nothing more. Except one thing.
VMWare.
Now load up a client Ubuntu or whatever Linux OS - use it for EVERYTHING but gaming.
Copy VM's to flash drives and run from there, core 'storage' can be shared out by the host OS and multiple Linux installs can go to the same spot - this helps prevent the 'oddities' that can happen on RARE occasion with Linux directly accessing Windows file systems.
Cool, aye?
Windows, the host OS, is stripped - I'm even going to block internet access as much as possible from the host OS. Linux does all the rest - viruses - be gone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirated Windows and Virus Issues
When Microsoft went to the genuine advantage program, they created a gap. I suspect that part of their plan was to leave pirated copies at a level where they became less and less stable and unusable because of virus attacks. Instead, all they have done is create their own worst ememy, a widespread network of easily infected machines.
The conficker virus's infection rate was signficantly higher in Asia than any other part of the world, mostly due to widespread unpatched pirated version of windows being used. The infection rate in the US was signficantly lower.
I think Microsoft's moves are in part of stem the tide of infections from unpatched machines. On that basis, people moving to Ubuntu or other OSes isn't exactly bad.
Ubuntu is really not ready for prime time. Overcast, your idea is nice, but entirely unworkable for the masses. This isn't 1989 here, people want a computer they turn on and it works, not something they have to spend half their life hacking on to try to get it to run something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirated Software
but your psychology is so adaptive that moms coma added to the matrix conditioning has you wasting your life.
You have been pirated. There is a reference, a real heading to be found, but most people are either afraid, heavily rationalizing, or just too lazy to gain profound clarity (and) all new friends and "family".
Just make the leap! Eagles that have never flown leave the nest every spring.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ummm This Is The Next Decade
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lmao
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
command line
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good 'ole Gramps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Linux BFF!
Now please stop the WINE is not an emulator.
It is an emulator!, and app level emulator, it does translate windows API calls to linux API calls so it is definitely a emulator. It is not however an full machine emulator like Qemu, VirtualBox, VMware, XEN and others. Other synonymous word is simulator they all mean the same thing.
LINUX!
I love the penguin.
Since I switched(when Vista came out) I didn't have much trouble, granted for many I would be called an expert.
I no longer have to keep worrying about the windows registry the mother of all evils, I no longer use the hex-editor that much.
I can use the fedora kickstart to make a personalized installation that will come with everything, that is not easy on windows.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kickstart_%28Linux%29
I can make a liveUSB in minutes anywhere with a laptop custom build.
Repositories comes with thousands of free software. I was just playing ultimastunts :)
Seriously I was a bit affraid of making the switch but when I saw what windows Vista was I just had to try something and I'm glad I did.
Wow, I can make any image to be an icon in windows you need to get some third party program to make an ICO file and to be truthfully I do spend a lot less time in forums searching for answers then I did with windows.
I really don't understand that fear.
Want to change the configurations of the inner working of the network in linux that is easy in windows you would have to disassemble the DLL and patch it with God knows what others have put out there.
Linux seems cumbersome but is a lot more transparent then windows the one thing I do miss is the MSN help forum, that is an incredible piece of work.
I never saw a problem not listed there even if it was to say there was no solution.
Now for the thing in China.
Microsoft already knows this, they have enforced copyright before and crack down on it and they saw something magic happening.
Others tools saw a decline in sales, with people not being able to use a pirated copy they also switched apps, so Microsoft in its infinite windows started to sell XP for $2 dollars and that is at a loss(or is it?).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Linux BFF!
It is an emulator!, and app level emulator, it does translate windows API calls to linux API calls so it is definitely a emulator. It is not however an full machine emulator like Qemu, VirtualBox, VMware, XEN and others. Other synonymous word is simulator they all mean the same thing."
Meh. Semantics.
It's a compatibility layer. The overhead is so small as to be negligible (literally a few indirections; a procedure call for every trap, and traps are as infrequent as possible in real programs because they are slow by nature), as opposed to a "full machine" emulator as you call it. The machine code being executed is the same, so execution speed is more or less the same as on Windows.
Qemu is the only full machine emulator there. The rest are virtualisation layers -- emulating just a few I/O components and such. Again, the overhead is mostly negligible, as the real work is done by native code.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Linux BFF!
Source:
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-c9e6502ad636315e905d07f7e44594757a6738e3
You got me there, you are right they emulate just part of the hardware still a compatibility layer is still an emulation layer. Well at least for me that.
The FreeBSD refer to "compatibility layers"(emulation layers) as emulation.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/linux-emulation/freebsd-emulation.html
I think they(the guys from Wine) used the "Wine Is Not an Emulator" because they didn't wont to be confused with CPU emulation but technically Wine is a emulation layer and thus a emulator.
http://wiki.winehq.org/Debunking_Wine_Myths#head-a97295d7364a2a87f5769eeff9b5105b61b85761
But I think they are deluding themselves. In the end Wine emulates the windows DLLs to function and is an emulator
Quote source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulator
Quote source:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/emulator?jss=0
Still think that Wine is not an emulator?
Fine I will not argue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Linux BFF!
Microsoft wouldn't dream of doing this.
That is why to create a live windows CD you have to go to a extensive marathon of steps to accomplish this simple task.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why WINE is not an "emulator" or why Win7 is
There was a time before the amateurs took over that words used in computing had precise meanings as they do in other sciences. Unfortunately that no longer applies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]