Couple Claims That Merely Talking About A Photo Is Copyright Infringement
from the good-luck-with-that-theory dept
Bert Reyntjens writes "Some time ago, the (nude) photograph of the wife of Helmut Lotti, a Belgian singer, was used in a famous Flemish quiz 'de slimste mens ter wereld' (or in English 'the smartest man in the world'). Several newspapers and magazines reported on this, some displayed the photograph, others didn't. Now Lotti and his wife are suing several of these publishers for copyright infringement because they didn't have the permission to show this picture.Everything so far seems more-or-less normal, except that one magazine (Story) was also sued even though it didn't publish the photograph (that link is in Dutch -- here is the Google translation), it only mentioned it. According to the lawyer for Lotti -- 'a mere reference to an image should be considered a reproduction of the image'!"
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, discussing, photos
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Power solution:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
American Sports
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
1000 words
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So a picture isn't worth a thousand words.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
didnt you mention it mike
i think i will blog about it,they are Belgium we have to pity them for that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Some help here
It is nude though.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: didnt you mention it mike
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Exactly what I was worried about
We used to tell each other stories - the bardic or minstrel tradition was all about mix and match, roll your own, mashup etc. It's not as though Homer actually wrote the Odyssey. And we need the story to know what's going on around us in the world, or over in the next village.
So where does modern copyright get off on telling us that we can't trade descriptions of things. Which, on the internet, is all we're doing. When you divorce a work from some physical media in which it's been instatiated, it's just a number. And *nobody* owns numbers. Yet. (Counterfeit is an entirely different matter IMHO)
Information wants to be free. /rant
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooong.
Historians will out of a job soon I guess.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Exactly what I was worried about
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Soooo,..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Soooo,..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"According to the lawyer for Lotti -- 'a mere reference to an image should be considered a reproduction of the image'!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1000 words
That guy has no trouble painting a picture is your head with a 1000 words, that breaks that rule. ^^
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anti-Mike
[ link to this | view in thread ]
#36521
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Interesting Theory, Bad Example
But -- suppose one described it with symbols for 0 and 1, going line-by-line, or pixel by pixel, until the entire content is reduced in writing to a series of 0s and 1s? That could be seen as a "written" "derivative work"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1000 words
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Exactly what I was worried about
It wants to be expensive because selfish evil people, the top one percent who are too lazy to compete in the free market and thus must rely on government intervention, want to charge for it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This guy said the word 'Image' therefore he's just reproduced every single image ever created (copyrighted or not) and since movies are just a series of images this means he just pirated every movie ever made...go get him MPAA!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Crazy
[ link to this | view in thread ]