If Data Centers Are Understaffed, What Does That Mean For Security?
from the seems-like-a-problem dept
While I'm always a little skeptical of the numbers found in vendor surveys, it wouldn't be too surprising to learn that the recent findings that half of all data centers find themselves understaffed are at least close to accurate. About 16% of the total surveyed claimed that their data centers were "extremely understaffed," with another 34% saying they were just somewhat understaffed. Reasons for the understaffing included both the difficulty of finding qualified people for more technologically complex datacenters and general economic cutbacks -- neither of which are particularly surprising.The bigger question is what impact this will have. Chronic understaffing in a data center could lead to serious security issues, increased downtime (decreased reliability) and certainly decreased responsiveness to problems. With many of the survey respondents also claiming they're hoping to decrease headcount even further, this could become a bigger issue going forward.
The report also claims that the survey's creators were "surprised" to find out that mid-market companies were more likely to experiment with new technologies, as compared to the big companies, but I don't find that surprising at all. Big companies are pretty resistant to change (especially if they have some big IT project that is "working.") Still, if those companies are finding their data centers regularly understaffed, it could create more difficulty in getting getting new projects successfully off the ground. So I'm curious how companies are dealing with these issues and trying to avoid problems with understaffed data centers, while still being able to try out new technologies and services.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: data centers, it, security
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Um....
What percentage of managers, do you think, will report being understaffed? Or not having a big enough budget?
I'm shocked that only 50% reported being understaffed. Clearly, data centers are being managed by relatively inexperienced people. That's probably more of a concern than the self-reported "understaffed" numbers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Um....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not a problem
Your design should be such that you *can* run a datacenter with very little staff.
And you should be able to switch datacenters in and out of operation as easily as you can nodes in a cluster.
I know of one company that does this. And much of the world probably uses their datacenters every day, without thinking much about it.
The way to do this is to hire smart network and systems engineers, a better grade of developer, great ops people, and management that supports them while staying the hell out of their way.
If you're unable or unwilling to do that, take your datacenter and company down the drain quickly, so you can free up the resources for someone not as stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not a problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
#1 reason is the people - they spend lots of time together and if they do not like their co-workers they look else where.
#2 reason is Burn out - when short staffed they need to supply 24 hr coverage so they pull stupid shifts and crazy hours.
It is not about money for most. They get paid well enough and due to over time and on-call hours they can make some really good money. If they get another job else where it is typically for about the same money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
transformation by elimination
Now the 200-odd engineers and contractors that used to be in the room sitting at consoles configuring their projects just hand off a network diagram to the lab monkeys. They sit at their desks and instantiate the network then tell the engineer to point their browser at the lab proxy, which picks up the engy's smart card and hands over their virtual environment.
The old system run by 200 people was woefully understaffed. Even this new system run by three people is understaffed but not by nearly as much as before.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]